Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:55 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:30 Liskeard to Looe
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:08:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 145 146 [147] 148 149 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 543733 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #2190 on: December 15, 2019, 17:27:49 »

Tiger is much more accurate, only really likely to be wrong when a problem has occurred en-route.  JourneyCheck is, at best, a very rough guide.

Not an IET (Intercity Express Train) but a good example of the hopelessness of JourneyCheck..

Quote
Facilities on the 17:51 Oxford to London Paddington due 18:56. This is due to a fault on this train. Will be formed of 3 coaches instead of 2

Which is actually running as booked as a 6-car Turbo along with the other trains on that diagram!   Roll Eyes
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #2191 on: December 19, 2019, 14:05:57 »

Interesting comment on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum concerning IET (Intercity Express Train) Introduction, from Tony Miles of Modern Railways:

Quote
The general view is that Hitachi focused heavily on building the new trains and not enough on the day to day delivery of sets in fully working state (and the right sets on the right diagrams). Odd as this is the lucrative part of the various contracts.. 30+ years of income... so much so that there is a significant change of senior management at Hitachi UK (United Kingdom) and a big push.to get things reorganised... both GWR (Great Western Railway) and LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) are politely saying they have confidence in Hitachi (openly) but behind the scenes the three TOCs (Train Operating Company) currently using 80x sets are understood to have reminded Hitachi they want operational trains as promised and not compensation... compensation doesn't carry passengers...

Good to hear, if true, that the TOCs are not simply going to lied down and accept some shortforms and instead rake in lots of compensation.  I'd seem to recollect some cynics predicting that?

It seems to me that GWR HAVE simply lied down, accepted some short forms, and raked in the compensation, for the first two years at least. Sod the passengers, 5 cars is fine, and much better than no train.
This might be changing, but don't count on it.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #2192 on: December 19, 2019, 15:17:33 »

Interesting comment on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum concerning IET (Intercity Express Train) Introduction, from Tony Miles of Modern Railways:

Quote
The general view is that Hitachi focused heavily on building the new trains and not enough on the day to day delivery of sets in fully working state (and the right sets on the right diagrams). Odd as this is the lucrative part of the various contracts.. 30+ years of income... so much so that there is a significant change of senior management at Hitachi UK (United Kingdom) and a big push.to get things reorganised... both GWR (Great Western Railway) and LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) are politely saying they have confidence in Hitachi (openly) but behind the scenes the three TOCs (Train Operating Company) currently using 80x sets are understood to have reminded Hitachi they want operational trains as promised and not compensation... compensation doesn't carry passengers...

Good to hear, if true, that the TOCs are not simply going to lied down and accept some shortforms and instead rake in lots of compensation.  I'd seem to recollect some cynics predicting that?

It seems to me that GWR HAVE simply lied down, accepted some short forms, and raked in the compensation, for the first two years at least. Sod the passengers, 5 cars is fine, and much better than no train.
This might be changing, but don't count on it.
That's pure speculation on your part. You've absolutely no idea what sort of conversations have been going on behind the scenes between GWR and Hitachi, which would be very unlikely to be aired in public. But your theory conveniently fits your anti-GWR and anti-IET campaign of course.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #2193 on: December 19, 2019, 20:17:05 »

My remarks are indeed speculation, but reasonable speculation based on observation of the ongoing short formations, for over two years now.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #2194 on: December 19, 2019, 21:35:06 »

My remarks are indeed speculation, but reasonable speculation based on observation of the ongoing short formations, for over two years now.
LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) passengers are now also experiencing short formation IETs (Intercity Express Train).

Personally I’m getting fed up with the comment I keep seeing on forums and Twitter that a five coach train is better than no train. Not when you can’t get on it because it’s full and standing it isn’t and for those on board seated or standing an uncomfortable journey.

Up until the arrival of the IETs we were used to seeing local and Thames Valley services short formed but never Intercity services. Faulty power car or carriage you just swapped them out. That was the flexibility that the HST (High Speed Train) model gave.

Now I like the IETs and think they are good trains but there are way too many five car sets, there should have been more nine car sets built. Too late now.
Logged
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #2195 on: December 19, 2019, 21:37:58 »


LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) passengers are now also experiencing short formation IETs (Intercity Express Train).

Maybe they could hold on to that nice blue and grey train which is currently doing a tour of LNER routes for a bit longer.  It looks ever so smart - I think even broadgage might like it.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #2196 on: December 20, 2019, 09:50:09 »

Broadgage would certainly support the retention of a few HSTs (High Speed Train) on LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) or GWR (Great Western Railway) or elsewhere, not as a long term measure but for a few years until the IETs (Intercity Express Train) are working properly, with no significant short formations.

So doing has been ruled out on GWR and seems unlikely elsewhere. The general view within the rail industry seems to be that IETs are the future and that short formations are acceptable.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #2197 on: December 20, 2019, 14:29:46 »

Maybe they could hold on to that nice blue and grey train which is currently doing a tour of LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) routes for a bit longer.  It looks ever so smart - I think even broadgage might like it.
It does look really great. I wonder if it’s one of the sets going over to EMR» (East Midlands Railway, also known as EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) (East Midlands Trains) - about)?
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #2198 on: December 20, 2019, 18:03:34 »

18.04 Paddington to Penzance showing as five coaches on Tiger. Any one able to confirm? Not listed on JC but that doesn’t mean anything.
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 633


View Profile
« Reply #2199 on: December 20, 2019, 19:31:22 »

18.04 Paddington to Penzance showing as five coaches on Tiger. Any one able to confirm? Not listed on JC but that doesn’t mean anything.

It was cancelled "due to train crew being delayed by service disruption" according to JC.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #2200 on: December 20, 2019, 20:06:58 »

It was cancelled "due to train crew being delayed by service disruption" according to JC.
RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) reports it was cancelled ‘due to a problem with the doors’.

JC reporting the service will now start at Exeter St Davids and was ‘due to a fault on the train in front of this one’.
Logged
Chris125
Full Member
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« Reply #2201 on: December 23, 2019, 01:20:45 »

Personally I’m getting fed up with the comment I keep seeing on forums and Twitter that a five coach train is better than no train. Not when you can’t get on it because it’s full and standing it isn’t and for those on board seated or standing an uncomfortable journey.

A 5-car train *is* better than no train, because the alternative is trying to squeeze everyone onto the following service - that sure as hell won't be a comfortable journey either, if they all fit, and now everyone's delayed too.

It's basic logic?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #2202 on: December 23, 2019, 04:15:01 »

Personally I’m getting fed up with the comment I keep seeing on forums and Twitter that a five coach train is better than no train. Not when you can’t get on it because it’s full and standing it isn’t and for those on board seated or standing an uncomfortable journey.

A 5-car train *is* better than no train, because the alternative is trying to squeeze everyone onto the following service - that sure as hell won't be a comfortable journey either, if they all fit, and now everyone's delayed too.

It's basic logic?

We seem to have moved on from "all services that need to be full length, will be" and towards "half length trains are not that bad, really" Progress I know but still regrettable.
All very voyager like.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #2203 on: December 23, 2019, 06:40:32 »

It's basic logic?
Basic logic would have been to have built enough full length trains to replace the full length trains they were replacing in the first place. But then basic logic does not apply to the railways.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2204 on: December 23, 2019, 07:08:51 »

It's basic logic?
Basic logic would have been to have built enough full length trains to replace the full length trains they were replacing in the first place. But then basic logic does not apply to the railways.

Stepping back - I think that perhaps basic logic does apply - and that on a good day when everything and everyone is working, the trains, line capacity and staff are all there.   It's called "making full use of your resources".  Sadly, when you get the wrong type of pollen, an operating incident such as a freight train sitting down, or a retirement party everyone wants to attend, there isn't the slack in the system to cope.  And where I've listed just three potential and rare incidents, there are 300 things that each very occasionally go wrong, adding up to something going wrong on most days.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 145 146 [147] 148 149 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page