Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:55 16 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
16th Apr (1987)
~ Tulyar arrives at Swanley New Barn Railway (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
15:23 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
Delayed
15/04/24 21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
06:28 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 16, 2024, 06:07:22 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] Okehampton
[119] The One-Way Wizzo
[59] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[53] From Melksham to Tallinn by train
[44] A two carriage train running back and forth - Swedish differen...
[30] 2024 Delays and Cancellations - North Cotswold Line
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: TfL consultation for new Overground stations  (Read 3256 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10113


View Profile
« on: October 21, 2017, 12:42:43 »

Open for the next month at:

https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/news-articles/old-oak-stations---your-views-needed

Two new potential stations on the Overground to connect with the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) and GWML (Great Western Main Line) new station at Old Oak Common.  One at Hythe Road on the Clapham Juntion line and the other at Old Oak Common Lane on the Richmond Line.  It's clear that Old Oak Common could quickly become the west London version of Stratford transport wise.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12355


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2017, 12:59:03 »

Eventually moving more pax than Paddington - I foresee all PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) trains calling there once fully built & operational.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2017, 16:41:02 »

Old Oak Common Lane would be quite handy for one of my journeys.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2017, 17:47:19 »

It's clear that Old Oak Common could quickly become the west London version of Stratford transport wise.

I think OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) potentially will be better connected than Stratford. 
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 515


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2017, 10:28:18 »

Always wondered whether it would not be a better idea to forget terminating HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) at Euston and just build a tunnel between OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) and Stratford, with possibly a through station buried under Euston/StP/KX if you were feeling lavish. Terminate everything at Ebbsfleet where there's bags of room for stabling/immigration for Continental services. Extend the Elizabeth line to Ebbsfleet and job's a good-un.
Logged
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 591


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2017, 11:36:45 »

Terminating HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) at any current London Terminus will be an expensive mistake.

Much better and cheaper to ensure OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) is built properly first, with great links. 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2017, 12:00:54 »

Always wondered whether it would not be a better idea to forget terminating HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) at Euston and just build a tunnel between OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) and Stratford, with possibly a through station buried under Euston/StP/KX if you were feeling lavish. Terminate everything at Ebbsfleet where there's bags of room for stabling/immigration for Continental services. Extend the Elizabeth line to Ebbsfleet and job's a good-un.
There was a proposal to do exactly this at least in Central London and to join HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) at Stratford - "Euston Cross" was the usual name of it - with a report somewhere within the vast array of information on the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and HS2 websites somewhere.   

The basic point in the rebuttal of the proposal was that the central through underground station would have needed long dwell times, hence at least four 400m HS (High Speed (short for HSS (High Speed Services) High Speed Services)) platforms, (like OOC) and building it and all the junctions would be unaffordable in any suitable location, given all the existing underground features.

Paul
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2017, 19:15:56 »

Always wondered whether it would not be a better idea to forget terminating HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) at Euston and just build a tunnel between OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) and Stratford, with possibly a through station buried under Euston/StP/KX if you were feeling lavish. Terminate everything at Ebbsfleet where there's bags of room for stabling/immigration for Continental services. Extend the Elizabeth line to Ebbsfleet and job's a good-un.

Ah you see you are missing the point, HS2 at Euston is not about a the "railway" its about how much money can be earned redeveloping the area; remember the Government in the guise of HS2 Ltd has is about to make compulsory purchases, NR» (Network Rail - home page) will loose the ownership of Euston station.   The return is based on 40 to 50 years and goes someway to pay for HS2
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2017, 23:25:35 »

Always wondered whether it would not be a better idea to forget terminating HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) at Euston and just build a tunnel between OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) and Stratford, with possibly a through station buried under Euston/StP/KX if you were feeling lavish. Terminate everything at Ebbsfleet where there's bags of room for stabling/immigration for Continental services. Extend the Elizabeth line to Ebbsfleet and job's a good-un.

Since Crossrail cost about £15bn I suspect you would be looking at more than that for the Euston Cross proposal with tunnels between OOC and Stratford. Even if you knocked off the cost of Euston that would be adding 30% to the cost of HS2.  I cannot see £15bn of benefit from the project. 

Also as Paul has hinted there is already an awful lot of London underground and fitting yet another line through would be very difficult. An underground walkway with a moving belt connecting Euston to Kings Cross/St Pancras (its not very far after all) would be an awful lot cheaper and only marginally less benefit. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page