Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
* How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 10:18:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Nippy Bus (Somerset) folds?  (Read 16301 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2017, 12:38:08 »

In principle, if you specify what you need exactly, and reject any bids that don't comply, you could reasonably take the lowest price bid and ignore any extras that were offered in it. Life isn't often like that, but it can come close, and of course comparing two numbers is relatively easy. However, I would hope that local authorities, who do a lot of contracting, can cope with assessing a range of other factors.

What is genuinely difficult is judging the credibility of a bidder, and justifying not believing their offer. I suppose that in theory it's their own loss if they get it wrong, and that should hold for big bidders. However, the existence of limited liability means it's not just their loss in the case of a small company'. And it's not unheard of for the boss of a small company to take a desperate lunge at landing a job as the last chance of avoiding failure.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2017, 16:26:21 »

For the financial repute element of holding an o licence for buses the operator is supposed to have an amount per vehicle in reserve funds. £4000 or £5000 I believe it is per vehicle. A council should be able to assume this is the case.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 31, 2017, 17:28:52 »

The requirement of a bond from the operator could be written into the tender contract.

Won't prevent insolvency on the part of the operator, but could shield the LA from having to dip into their emergency contingency funding to organise short notice cover. 
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #33 on: October 31, 2017, 18:11:26 »

Presumably in that case, operators go bust sooner, if they can't fall back on their bond?

By the time the council use this bond for relief buses, you're presumably at the same date as if the operator had spent their bond before going bust?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: October 31, 2017, 19:06:43 »

Huh? I'm suggesting the contractor has to give the LA a bond. It won't be the contractors to use to stave off insolvency. These could be bonds similar to those required by the ATOL scheme.

The bond is there to protect the public purse from further unreclaimable expense.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #35 on: October 31, 2017, 19:47:29 »

the NippyBus N9 between Martock and Yeovil replaced First S&A (as then was) Service 52 over that route so it seems that things will go back to how they were but will incorporate the route of Service N8.

SWC had the 667 previously before loosing it to NippyBus on tender.

As for the 669 Frome Minibuses had it previously but haven't operated it since 12th June 2016 after which NippyBus took it over under tender from SCC(resolve).
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2017, 08:56:15 »

Huh? I'm suggesting the contractor has to give the LA a bond. It won't be the contractors to use to stave off insolvency. These could be bonds similar to those required by the ATOL scheme.

And I'm not querying that either.
Where do they get the funding from gfor this bond? Yup, their cash reserves, which are then depleted by the amount of the bond, and thus they have less cash to run their buses. Thus they go bust sooner.

The bond then covers replacement buses, and would probably expire (used p) by the time the company would have gone bust if there was no bond & they spent the same cash keeping their operation going that much longer. Swings & roundabouts.




Edit note: Quote marks fixed, purely in the interests of clarity. CfN.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2017, 23:48:09 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2017, 09:27:21 »

And if the operators were making a profit it wouldn't matter. That they don't is a symptom of wider problems in transport, public and private.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2017, 09:29:53 »

yup - we should pay more council tax so that these companies can make a profit.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2017, 09:31:30 »

Huh? I'm suggesting the contractor has to give the LA a bond. It won't be the contractors to use to stave off insolvency. These could be bonds similar to those required by the ATOL scheme.

And I'm not querying that either.
Where do they get the funding from gfor this bond? Yup, their cash reserves, which are then depleted by the amount of the bond, and thus they have less cash to run their buses. Thus they go bust sooner.

The bond then covers replacement buses, and would probably expire (used p) by the time the company would have gone bust if there was no bond & they spent the same cash keeping their operation going that much longer. Swings & roundabouts.

The company might not need to put down the capital. Bonds can be bought a bit like an insurance policy. That would mean some companies would have to pay higher premiums than others - and some companies would be considered uninsurable. That would obviously then be factored into the tender, but then the tenders would all be on the basis of equal risk to the local authority and to the travelling public.  

I hope I corrected the quotes in my quote correctly




Edit note: Yes, you did. I've now corrected the quote marks in the previous post, too, in the interests of clarity. CfN.  Wink
« Last Edit: November 02, 2017, 23:52:18 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2017, 09:33:46 »

yup - we should pay more council tax so that these companies can make a profit.

The problem seems to be that they do not make a profit at all - that is why so many of them are going bust!  And leaving the local authority to pick up the bill. 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #41 on: November 01, 2017, 10:19:55 »

hence my suggestion. the taxpayer shoulders the council's expenditure, whether through the initial contract or after they go bust.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40688



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #42 on: November 01, 2017, 10:44:00 »

From the Daily Mail - their angle:

Quote
Drivers hit out at 'disgusting' bus company boss 'who spent all his time in Thailand' after he sacked entire staff by telling them: 'I can't work with you a moment longer'
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: November 01, 2017, 11:08:52 »

Remarkably restrained and un-Daily Mail like comments section on that article so far!  Huh
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: November 01, 2017, 15:27:26 »

yup - we should pay more council tax so that these companies can make a profit.
That might help Nippy Bus and other local bus operators, but what about ToCs? And although airlines don't get subsidies (at least in the conventional sense), the overall airline industry rarely if ever makes a profit.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page