Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:34:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[211] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[66] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[36] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[28] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[26] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
Author Topic: Carillion - railway contractor / public services provider - financial concerns, 2017/18, now in liquidation  (Read 27251 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: January 14, 2018, 18:54:21 »

A further update, from the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Carillion: Banks call for government help

The troubled government contractor Carillion has held talks with its creditor banks this weekend and further meetings are planned for Monday, the BBC understands.

The construction firm owes £900m to RBS, Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and Santander.  The banks may be able to show Carillion more leniency if the government is able to do its part, according to sources.

The firm's future is also being discussed by government officials.  Carillion is involved in major public projects such as the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) high-speed rail line, as well as managing schools and prisons.

How exactly the banks want the government to intervene is unclear.  They could want the government to offer some guarantees in case Carillion cannot pay back its debts.  Or they may want the government to take some of Carillion's key projects back into the public sector.

The TUC has called on the government to "step in" to "guarantee jobs and services".  Deputy general secretary Paul Nowak said: "Tens of thousands of jobs are now at risk, along with vital public services and major infrastructure projects across the country."

New Tory party chairman Brandon Lewis told the BBC the government was keeping "a very close eye on this".  Mr Lewis told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show that the government was "making sure all plans and contingency plans are in place".  But he refused to be drawn on whether the government would bail Carillion out.  "It's a very commercially sensitive situation so I wouldn't comment further than to say I would hope to see that the working capital that they need will be there working with their partners," he said.

Labour peer Lord Adonis, who last month quit a head of the National Infrastructure Commisson, tweeted that the government has "got questions to answer about propping up Carillion with contracts long after its problems clear. Looks like another Grayling bailout!"

Last summer Transport Secretary Chris Grayling awarded Carillion part of the contract to build HS2, a week after the company had issued a profits warning and its chief executive had departed.


Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 14, 2018, 20:02:59 »

I've not heard anything so far about what the public service contracts contain as provisions for this eventuality, but it would be very odd indeed if they don't. After all, rail franchises do - including a Railway Administration Order as an option, and we've seen that happen to Railtrack.

In what is by now a standard part of the contract (Schedule 10 for GWR (Great Western Railway), SWR» (South Western Railway - about), TSGN) there is a section called "Events of Default and Termination Events", and the list includes under "Insolvency" all the subspecies of that - Administration, Insolvency, Arrangements with Creditors, Stopping Business/Winding-Up, Railway Administration Order, or Security Enforceable (e.g. sequestration). As we saw, the government has the right to requisition the operation and keep it functioning, and it would be bizarre if that was seen as essential for the railways but not for any other privatised services.

What I can't see in the franchise agreement (contract) text (but of course it might be hiding somewhere in the roughly 600 pages of Eversheds' best verbiage) is any specification of how the business has to be structured to make that effective. I think the operation  has to be a self-contained subsidiary (unless, like Railtrack, it is a free-standing company with its own shareholders). However, it also needs to be operationally independent of the parent and all other group companies to ensure it can be detached in viable form.

Of course the contract is not the right place for a description of the HMG would do, as that's not an obligation on either side. But, as I said, there do seem to be some limited requirements on the contractor for "frangibility". As to the rest of the Carillion businesses, the PFI build contracts not yet delivered are a bit less urgent, and the commercial construction contracts can be dealt with in the usual way.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: January 14, 2018, 20:16:08 »

The banks need to take their losses if there is to be taxpayer inout, IMHI
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2018, 06:59:29 »

NOW IN LIQUIDATION
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2018, 08:23:22 »

Entered liquidation this morning, reported to impact 20000 employees in the U.K.!
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2018, 09:59:27 »

From The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
[Carillion] is the second biggest supplier of maintenance services to Network Rail, and it maintains 50,000 homes for the Ministry of Defence.

Think article should have said "was" rather than "is" ??
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2018, 10:37:33 »

From The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
[Carillion] is the second biggest supplier of maintenance services to Network Rail, and it maintains 50,000 homes for the Ministry of Defence.

Think article should have said "was" rather than "is" ??


Has the liquidator stopped work, otherwise for the moment still is...
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2018, 12:14:55 »

Is the Chairman, Philip Green the same Philip green who was at the helm of BHS? If so it raises more questions.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2018, 12:25:25 »

Is the Chairman, Philip Green the same Philip green who was at the helm of BHS? If so it raises more questions.

No.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2018, 14:11:49 »

HMG at least did the right thing eventually, by doing nothing to prevent Carillion going bust.

Whether they should have continued awarding large contracts over the past year is questionable.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2018, 14:16:59 »

Although some took precautions. For example Oxfordshire CC decided to arrange an orderly wind-down and exit from contracts with Carillion in the middle of last year. There was only one left (for school meals and cleaning) which would have finished at the end of March if Carillion had lasted that long and preparations to take that in house were advanced. They have stated that there were no extra payments to do this, so I guess they used breakpoints or didn't take up options in the contracts where they weren't to come to a natural end.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2018, 18:53:26 »

Somerset County Council won't now get any recompense for the poor workmanship and delays to the Inner Relief Road in Taunton.

SCC(resolve) were suing Carillion. The road was opened 27 months late. Carillion also tapped SCC for an extra £3 million to complete the job after seemingly under-bidding for the contract. Although the road is open there is still outstanding work - drainage, surface dressing, pavements - that needs completing.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 15, 2018, 19:24:48 »

Carillion also tapped SCC(resolve) for an extra £3 million to complete the job after seemingly under-bidding for the contract. Although the road is open there is still outstanding work - drainage, surface dressing, pavements - that needs completing.

That was their style right back to when they were Tarmac Construction.  Everyone knew it in the industry. Find a loophole work out what it was  worth knock that off the tender price so they would win the work, then claim it back later!
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2018, 20:22:15 »

Drainage seems an issue with most new roads, the Dobwalls bypass my local candidate has been redone several times to no success.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 15, 2018, 20:30:19 »

Well, companies come and companies go...  My concern is for all of the employees involved.  Must be a very worrying time for them all.  Been there in the past and I would never want to be there again... Angry
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page