Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- What contributed to the Baltimore Bridge collapse?
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
07:38 Exeter St Davids to Okehampton
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
07:54 Looe to Liskeard
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:18 Yeovil Pen Mill to Filton Abbey Wood
06:48 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
07:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:35 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 08:27:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[155] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[124] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[85] Return of the BRUTE?
[67] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[29] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: GWRF2020-02 Splitting the current franchise area into two franchises  (Read 7464 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 30, 2017, 08:11:41 »

Consultation Question 2

a) Do you agree or disagree with the proposals outlined above for splitting the Great Western franchise into smaller franchises?
– Agree
– Disagree
– No opinion
b) Why?



Explanatory text

The following map illustrates one possible option for a two-way split, comprising:
●● One franchise, coloured blue on the map below, concentrating on the intercity markets between London and Bristol, South Wales and the Cotswolds, outer suburban and branch line services in the Thames Valley, airport services and potentially future services using the proposed western rail link to Heathrow;
●● Another franchise, coloured red on the map below, providing long-distance services between London, Wiltshire, Somerset, Devon and Cornwall (including the Sleeper), together with regional and local services across the central and south-western parts of the franchise area, including potential future services to Portishead and other elements of the ‘MetroWest’ scheme. This could include the services between Paddington, Newbury and Bedwyn, as although they may be a good fit with other Thames Valley services, there could be potential for the Newbury and Bedwyn services to be integrated within the longer-distance intercity services that operate along the same route.



See http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19037 for the background to this topic
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2017, 23:46:07 »

So is no West of England Services via Bristol a proposal of this consultation or has the decision already been made?
Also the same for no Direct trains from WSM to Paddington?

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2017, 05:49:00 »

So is no West of England Services via Bristol a proposal of this consultation or has the decision already been made?
Also the same for no Direct trains from WSM to Paddington?

There is some reference in question 8 - see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19045

Noting also on the map a whole load of other elements - some of which I suspect are due to a simplified diagram. But still potential for comment.

- No Carmarthen or Pembroke Dock
- No through London to Worcester via Ashchurch service
- No local services between Newton Abbott and Plymouth
- No TransWilts services continuing south of Westbury (indeed only SWR» (South Western Railway - about) and CDF» (Cardiff - next trains)-PMH services to Warminster)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2017, 05:49:19 »

What GWR (Great Western Railway) thinks of the proposal to split the franchise. Unsurprisingly not too keen in the idea:

http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/news/bath-news/gwr-dismisses-proposed-break-up-849624

For what it’s worth I don’t see it happening. Maybe a bit of tinkering around the edges of the GWR network  with some lines going to other franchises.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2017, 06:20:38 »

What GWR (Great Western Railway) thinks of the proposal to split the franchise. Unsurprisingly not too keen in the idea:

http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/news/bath-news/gwr-dismisses-proposed-break-up-849624

For what it’s worth I don’t see it happening. Maybe a bit of tinkering around the edges of the GWR network  with some lines going to other franchises.

Here's the GWR comment:

Quote
A spokesman for GWR said it understood the Government's desire to reshape the franchise but that the proposal was "simply an option" that would not happen for at least five years if it went ahead at all.

Note though that an option requires an alternative.   Is the alternative "no change" as I don't see anything else laid down in the document explicitly as what could happen if the option is not taken.   Searching the document, the only place I find "Carmarthen" or "Pembroke" is on the current franchise map ... no other questions / alternatives there ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2017, 09:27:08 »

The consultation document itself reads to me as finding more faults with the idea on balance than arguments in favour.
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2017, 15:05:39 »

a; Disagree

b; I don't have much thought process on this one, and won't bother outlining the pros v cons as this has already been done in the consultation document, but I am against the idea. Possibly as discussed in question 3 some 'fat' could be trimmed off the current area, Greenford, Brighton etc, but personally I would like to see the core of the franchise remain as it is.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2017, 21:57:53 »

I am thoroughly opposed to this. This is just another politicians' fad.

There's a reason this was nearly all one company even before 1923.  It works best as a network.  I cannot see better services from swindon to the South West resulting from this - quite the opposite.  It will reduce flexibility when things go wrong and will constrain innovation when things go right. 

Splitting it up before 2006 did not work - that's why they put it all together - so why should splitting it up again work any better now?

They have removed much of the LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) trains to TfL» (Transport for London - about).  What more do they need to tinker with now!
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2017, 09:14:08 »

Another potential reason is the problem when there need to be diversions.  If the franchises are split will there be less opportunities to maintain route knowledge for diversions.  I suppose it is linked to shared traction knowledge - depending on whether the 800/801 and 802s need separate training for traction knowledge.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2018, 22:22:50 »

If the franchises are split and there are no West of England Services via Bristol, how will the 'Red' Drivers maintain the route knowledge for diversions? 

Ditto How will 'Blue' drivers maintain the route knowledge for diversions the other way?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2018, 06:16:36 »

If the franchises are split and there are no West of England Services via Bristol, how will the 'Red' Drivers maintain the route knowledge for diversions? 

Ditto How will 'Blue' drivers maintain the route knowledge for diversions the other way?

Resilience drops within a smaller franchise ... but then resilience is traded off against cost in the planning. 

At the time the railway was expected to be running with all-electric class 801 units from London to Bristol and to Swansea, they would have been scuppered with a closure just about anywhere along their main line leaving only the extended services (Carmarthen, Weston-super-mare able to take an alternative line.  And with the sea wall breach at Dawlish fading from the memory (are there any DfT» (Department for Transport - about) ministers who were there at the time still at the DfT??) and not so high on the agenda, we see that resilience beyond running (say) 98% of the time perhaps isn't an investment priority.

It would be possible to send one train a day via a different route - as done at Foxhall curve, Ogmore Valley, and a few others.  At one time in the not too distant past,a regular relief train from London to the West Country used to run via Chippenham and Westbury, and I'm sure there are other examples ... and it would be possible to divert a train with a second driver from another company who know the road, but perhaps not the traction.  At short notice that would be impractical, but then at a cost of £££££ does the franchise specifier need to have such backup resources and systems in place to save just ££ of hassle on the occasional unplanned day?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2018, 16:10:37 »

According to Philip Haigh of rail on twitter, the franchise is not going to be split.
Apparently there was no support for the proposal in the consultation.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2018, 21:09:34 »

According to Philip Haigh of rail on twitter, the franchise is not going to be split.
Apparently there was no support for the proposal in the consultation.

Good news - excellent when confirmed [personal view, but clearly the majority one]

Also suggests the power of consultation inputs, and an example of how they can be a significant element in decisions.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2018, 00:42:05 »

According to Philip Haigh of rail on twitter, the franchise is not going to be split.
Apparently there was no support for the proposal in the consultation.

Good news - excellent when confirmed [personal view, but clearly the majority one]

Also suggests the power of consultation inputs, and an example of how they can be a significant element in decisions.


Whilst its great news, it also goes to show just how out of touch the government and Department for Transport are with issues related to the railway...
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9809



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 25, 2018, 04:17:42 »

Confirmed by Chris Grayling at the end of his session with the Transport Select Committee.

https://goo.gl/2FTNnx

Fast forward to 15:42:45 - also contains brief discussion on Cross Country franchise.
(Reference is Time of Day rather than 15 minutes into the video)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page