Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:55 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:20 Reading to Shalford
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:40 Redhill to Reading
19:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 20:10:12 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[118] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[116] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[89] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[28] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Current and future traffic from Thingley to Bradford junctions  (Read 3053 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 14, 2017, 07:01:42 »

In order to inform future planning, where I may now find myself suggesting / commenting rather than just observing from afar, I have dug out my crystal ball and listed current and potential traffics on the single line section of the TransWilts.   Westbury resignalling in 2026 suggested an intermediate signal to allow trains to follow at closer intervals, but that was way back in the days when 2026 was so far ahead it was hidden in the mists called the "far future"

Can members take a look at the following / comment if they can on the various elements - especially if their crystal balls are better informed than mine, and add in any other serious or indeed aspirational dreams they may be aware of.

Current services - order based on approx number of movements at pressnt
Passenger trains - local journeys between Swindon and Westbury
Stone train - Somerset quarries to Royal Wootton Bassett and east thereof
Passenger trains between Cheltenham Spa and Southampton and vv
Freight - Southampton area to Midlands and North
Track and engineering trains between Westbury and Swindon
Diverted trains - when Bath Spa closed
Diverted trains - when Berks and Hants closes
Diverted trains - when Swindon to Didcot closed
Passenger Charters including heritage services
Network Rail Test Train
MOD to Warminster

Potential traffics in the near and perhaps further future in no particular order
Increase in some of the above (passenger destinations may vary beyond line)
Open Access passenger services
Additional freight from the Southampton area
HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) construction trains from Westbury Tarmac
Passenger trains to Bath and Bristol
Regular heritage services
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2017, 09:08:02 »

2026 is still a long way away, especially when you consider the average delay of current resignalling schemes.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2017, 09:40:33 »

2026 is still a long way away, especially when you consider the average delay of current resignalling schemes.

Totally agreed.  The question's raised "is an extra signal halfway along in 2026 or at some date around or after then enough to meet requirements for the next 30 years".  And there are two parts to that question - what would the extra signal (and various alternative options) give in terms of shaped capacity, and what are those requirements likely to be?

The 2026 date was set / suggested at the time there were about 20,000 local passenger journeys per annum being made on the single track section - that's now well over 200,000; some predicted that such a change might happen but others described it as "fanciful" and I don't know which view was taken by the people making the suggestion.  Looking forward, there's more of a tendency to be bull rather than bear when making suggestions of the possible - the question "could it continue to grow" tends to get more answers of "yes" than it used to.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2017, 11:10:36 »

I don't have any special knowledge here other than having travelled over the lien a few times, but my "ignorant thoughts" are ...

How much would an intermediate signal on a single track section help?  Presumably it is only be significantly useful if traffic patterns have many trains a day were the proceeding train is in the same direction.  Are we able to predict such a pattern from future likely usage?  You might say in reply that although the passenger timetable is likely to alternate up-down-up-down-up-down etc, freight can be slotted in to follow the passenger trains as up(passenger), up(freight), down (passenger, down (freight).  That may be correct, but that only works if there is somewhere (sidings) for the freight to wait for its path without interfering with traffic elsewhere.  It would be a shame to invest in a new signal section if the advantages it provided were not fully realisable because of constraints elsewhere.

Need to make sure that the location of this signal did not interfere with any future ambition to add a passing loop 
Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2017, 16:12:10 »

When the Salisbury -Exeter line was recontrolled section signals were installed at Crewkerne, both up and down directions. This has allowed Trains to be fleeted if running late, the routing of GWR (Great Western Railway) services without too much interference on SWT (South West Trains) and the occasional stem service.
Thus while nothing is regularly timetabled as such it has proven it's worth.

The NR» (Network Rail - home page) Wessex RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy) suggests that additional section signals be added between Castle Cary and Yeovil, to allow additional services. This was before the SWT, now SWR» (South Western Railway - about), services were added and which might increase further in 2018.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2017, 16:53:55 »

Grahame,  I thought we had already discussed some ideas here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18449.msg216539#msg216539
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2017, 22:28:39 »

Freight - Southampton area to Midlands and North

Not sure this is viable, whilst you free Reading they still have to  use Thingley to Didcot and on to Oxford on heavily used 2 track railways. Are there any paths for slow freight with 125 IETs (Intercity Express Train).
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2017, 01:53:18 »

Grahame,  I thought we had already discussed some ideas here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18449.msg216539#msg216539

Fair point - should the topics be merged?  Undecided

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2017, 04:58:22 »

Grahame,  I thought we had already discussed some ideas here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18449.msg216539#msg216539
Fair point - should the topics be merged?  Undecided

There are two sides to this coin and my thought / intent was to raise each of the two sides in a thread.

This topic asks "what traffic demands do we see for the future?" and the other topics asks "how do we meet the fuire demand?".   So it was my thought that topics like "could we find significant amounts of Westbury to Claydon, then Westbury to Stafford, traffic to be run in the future" could be addresses here, and that topics like "can the existing line cope, or does it need more signalling / track work" could be (and indeed have been) addressed in the other thread.

I'll let you be the judge of whether they should be merged, Chris.   Happy either way; I'm a bit close to this - defendant and judge on the case if I make the decision.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2017, 05:16:14 »

Freight - Southampton area to Midlands and North

Not sure this is viable, whilst you free Reading they still have to  use Thingley to Didcot and on to Oxford on heavily used 2 track railways. Are there any paths for slow freight with 125 IETs (Intercity Express Train).

Whichever way (via Bramley or via Melksham) you send the freight, you have the issue from just north of Didcot to the centre of Oxford - perhaps to the point north thereof where the lines to Worcester, Banbury and Cambridge diverge.

Royal Wootton Basett (or Swindon) to just west of Didcot / capacity is an interesting question.  Is the extra capacity there released by a loss of coal traffic (below - see DfT» (Department for Transport - about) Rail fact sheet for background) used up again by extra passenger trains?  I would be surprised if it were, simply because the coal traffic drop might not have been a certainly at the time electrification was planned.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2017, 12:06:38 »

Whichever way (via Bramley or via Melksham) you send the freight, you have the issue from just north of Didcot to the centre of Oxford - perhaps to the point north thereof where the lines to Worcester, Banbury and Cambridge diverge.

Of course the third way is via Bradford, Bath and Cheltenham. This avoids Oxford, but may hit other capacity points such as Bath to Bristol (though after four tracking presumably not Filton Bank).

Royal Wootton Basett (or Swindon) to just west of Didcot / capacity is an interesting question.  Is the extra capacity there released by a loss of coal traffic (below - see DfT» (Department for Transport - about) Rail fact sheet for background) used up again by extra passenger trains?  I would be surprised if it were, simply because the coal traffic drop might not have been a certainly at the time electrification was planned.

If Didcot was the only destination for coal trains then the coal fired plant there closed some time ago and would have been a certainty at the time electrification was planned. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2017, 23:10:16 »

Grahame,  I thought we had already discussed some ideas here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18449.msg216539#msg216539
Fair point - should the topics be merged?  Undecided

There are two sides to this coin and my thought / intent was to raise each of the two sides in a thread.

This topic asks "what traffic demands do we see for the future?" and the other topics asks "how do we meet the future demand?".  So it was my thought that topics like "could we find significant amounts of Westbury to Claydon, then Westbury to Stafford, traffic to be run in the future" could be addressed here, and that topics like "can the existing line cope, or does it need more signalling / track work" could be (and indeed have been) addressed in the other thread.

I'll let you be the judge of whether they should be merged, Chris.  Happy either way; I'm a bit close to this - defendant and judge on the case if I make the decision.

Thanks for those comments, grahame: I'm happy to leave the two topics as they are.  Wink

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page