Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:55 20 Apr 2024
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningShort Run
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
22:00 Hereford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 00:55:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[276] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[265] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[45] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[40] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[19] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[18] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 [54] 55 56
  Print  
Author Topic: Cotswold Line - 2018 cancellation and amendments log  (Read 178171 times)
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #795 on: December 20, 2018, 13:58:32 »

This one, 14:41 To Westbury, This train has no toilet facilities.
Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #796 on: December 20, 2018, 14:12:12 »

I am surprised that someone who regularly travels this line / season ticket holder doesn't take action against GWR (Great Western Railway) by doing a 'charge back' with their credit cards providers or a small claims court action for constantly failing to provide the advertised service.

I recall earlier this year a guy got money back on his season ticket over and above that which the rail company would have given to him for the constant cancellations he was experiencing.

I am still waiting for a refund when a GWR train I was intending to travel on was cancelled on June 16th this year. With the festive break coming up it will give me a chance to catch up on this one with a letter before action to GWR, copy to Hopwood and if that doesn't produce my refund then it'll be a claim through the small claims court with the associated small claims court fee added together with my time in preping the case at £15 / hour.



Why are so many having problems getting refunds. I once got tickets for the 15:37 to Great Malvern, Only after entering the platform,that the screen changed to Worcester shrub hill, Anyway spoke to the person dispatching, and told to take to ticket office, I did and tickets were cancelled and then repaid, I then decided to go to Cheltenham instead on the same train. Which by that time arrived on platform 1.
Logged
charles_uk
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 712

thewalkingpage
View Profile
« Reply #797 on: December 20, 2018, 14:30:45 »

Yesterday, the 13:22 Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street was six minutes late onto the single track at Wolvercote Junction....

And the inevitable consequence was the termination of the 15:50 Paddington to Moreton-in-Marsh at Oxford.

And today the 13:22 has arrived at Oxford 12 minutes late...
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2018



View Profile
« Reply #798 on: December 20, 2018, 17:01:22 »

Why are so many having problems getting refunds. I once got tickets for the 15:37 to Great Malvern, Only after entering the platform,that the screen changed to Worcester shrub hill, Anyway spoke to the person dispatching, and told to take to ticket office, I did and tickets were cancelled and then repaid, I then decided to go to Cheltenham instead on the same train. Which by that time arrived on platform 1.

Getting a refund on the day having decided not to travel is an entirely different kettle of fish to obtaining a refund/compensation for delays as the ticket office has the authority to cancel your ticket if not used within a couple of hours of issue.
Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #799 on: December 20, 2018, 19:29:00 »

Yesterday, the 13:22 Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street was six minutes late onto the single track at Wolvercote Junction....

And the inevitable consequence was the termination of the 15:50 Paddington to Moreton-in-Marsh at Oxford.

And today the 13:22 has arrived at Oxford 12 minutes late...

I Bet the people of oxford are getting, or have got fed up with the constant shortened journey,s by now, have,nt they?. As my other post said about great malverns getting constantly terminated at Worcester, Although since the 4 track of the Filton bank, they are now rerely doing this.
Logged
charles_uk
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 712

thewalkingpage
View Profile
« Reply #800 on: December 20, 2018, 19:47:48 »

Yesterday, the 13:22 Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street was six minutes late onto the single track at Wolvercote Junction....

And the inevitable consequence was the termination of the 15:50 Paddington to Moreton-in-Marsh at Oxford.

And today the 13:22 has arrived at Oxford 12 minutes late...

I Bet the people of oxford are getting, or have got fed up with the constant shortened journey,s by now, have,nt they?. As my other post said about great malverns getting constantly terminated at Worcester, Although since the 4 track of the Filton bank, they are now rerely doing this.

The 13:22 was held at Evesham and terminated at Worcester Shrub Hill to let the 15:22 WOS» (Worcester Shrub Hill - next trains):PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) through first easing later delays. But the 16:22 Paddington to Great Malvern was terminated at Worcester Foregate Street with the return running similarly affected:

Quote
19:42 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 22:31 will be started from Worcester Foregate Street.
It will no longer call at Great Malvern and Malvern Link.
This is due to an operational incident.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #801 on: December 20, 2018, 21:34:13 »

The operational incident being a wrong side door release at Hanborough.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #802 on: December 20, 2018, 21:58:50 »

The operational incident being a wrong side door release at Hanborough.

Crikey! What doughnuts, How did they manage that.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #803 on: December 21, 2018, 00:11:10 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #804 on: December 23, 2018, 14:00:28 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.

I Thought trains had sensors on the side beneath the doors that detect that the platform wall is in front of it.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #805 on: December 23, 2018, 14:07:09 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.

I Thought trains had sensors on the side beneath the doors that detect that the platform wall is in front of it.

What happens when there is no platform wall to be against as in the case of my station, Yate.
Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #806 on: December 23, 2018, 14:11:35 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.

I Thought trains had sensors on the side beneath the doors that detect that the platform wall is in front of it.

What happens when there is no platform wall to be against as in the case of my station, Yate.

Is there not a platform wall in front by the track that supports the platform edge at yate?.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #807 on: December 23, 2018, 15:03:16 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.

I Thought trains had sensors on the side beneath the doors that detect that the platform wall is in front of it.

What happens when there is no platform wall to be against as in the case of my station, Yate.

Is there not a platform wall in front by the track that supports the platform edge at yate?.

Nope, there are concrete block pillars between which precast slabs were placed, a membrane was placed on the slabs followed by sand which was compressed onto which was placed a 'brick' like final surface. Normal concrete platform edging forming the edge. If I were that way inclined I could gain access to the rear of the platform and crawl under the platform to the track sleepers. Construction of  the re-opened Yate station was a really cheap project and when I read of the millions that are being quoted for reopening / new stations nowadays I do wonder if a new build of Yate in todays world would comply with todays NR» (Network Rail - home page) minimum standards for new stations / new platforms.
Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #808 on: December 23, 2018, 15:18:13 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.

I Thought trains had sensors on the side beneath the doors that detect that the platform wall is in front of it.

What happens when there is no platform wall to be against as in the case of my station, Yate.

Is there not a platform wall in front by the track that supports the platform edge at yate?.

Nope, there are concrete block pillars between which precast slabs were placed, a membrane was placed on the slabs followed by sand which was compressed onto which was placed a 'brick' like final surface. Normal concrete platform edging forming the edge. If I were that way inclined I could gain access to the rear of the platform and crawl under the platform to the track sleepers. Construction of  the re-opened Yate station was a really cheap project and when I read of the millions that are being quoted for reopening / new stations nowadays I do wonder if a new build of Yate in todays world would comply with todays NR» (Network Rail - home page) minimum standards for new stations / new platforms.

So its not like the new one at Filton Abbey Wood, which was grey bricks and the same at Reading. When they extended the platforms at Stonehouse they had large premade concrete sections with slots in the top to run lighting cables.

I will have to take a look next time I leave Gloucester to go to temple meads, Sounds rubbish, obviously they would have to fill it in.
Logged
JontyMort
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #809 on: December 23, 2018, 15:55:06 »

They would have pressed the door release buttons on the left hand side (as is usual for 90+% of the station stops they do), instead of the right hand side as they should have for Hanborough.  Drivers make mistakes sometimes.

I believe software to stop a driver from doing it will eventually be installed on IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and some other trains such as 387s, as in certain situations in can be quite dangerous.  No harm done on this particular occasion though.

And in any event, why would such a mistake delay a train by more than about the ten seconds or so required to realise the mistake? As a reason terminating a service short it seems odd.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 [54] 55 56
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page