Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:47:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[116] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[50] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[46] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[45] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Service 1A09  (Read 5576 times)
Phantom
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 484



View Profile
« on: January 05, 2018, 12:58:26 »

Have to share two (not so) great experiences on the new IET (Intercity Express Train) from Weston to Temple Meads this morning

The service was advertised as being 10 carriages on the departure boards at Weston
Just as the service was pulling into the station this morning a frantic announcement came over the tannoy saying that in fact only the front 5 carriages were in use.
Mad panic of people rushing to the far end of the platform to get to an open door!

On the train it was soon full, a passenger enquired why the rear 5 carriages had been out of service for the past two days, the guard told them that it was because there were insufficient numbers of staff available to operate what essentially is two separate trains.

This got me wondering, there was a train Manager and this other lady selling tickets, how many staff do they need within each section to "open" it to the public? Surely only the train Manager is controlling the doors and the other lady is selling the tickets?

I was then curious on this service why GWR (Great Western Railway) staff were so active in selling tickets to ticketless passengers when they are constantly announcing about penalty fares and the requirement to buy a ticket before boarding

On another service it is just as likely to see the revenue inspectors on a service, so was wondering why it is deemed acceptable to buy a ticket on some services but can be given a penalty fair on others?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2018, 13:08:26 »

On another service it is just as likely to see the revenue inspectors on a service, so was wondering why it is deemed acceptable to buy a ticket on some services but can be given a penalty fair on others?

Often depends on how commission hungry the staff are!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2018, 13:25:40 »

Are we beginning to see the folly of the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) dictating that 5 car units were ordered rather than 9 car units.

Aren't these trains DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) Huh? perhaps with the train manager giving the driver the signal to close the doors as is done on Cross Country, who also incidentally seem to operate units in multiple without a connecting gangway between the units.
Logged
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2018, 13:30:25 »

Still bemused why the Government|DfT» (Department for Transport - about)|NR» (Network Rail - home page) should decide to replace 8-carriage HST (High Speed Train) with 2x5-carriage IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.).

It was always going to need more staff, and if the powers that be thought the flexibility of of separating 2x5-carraige IEPS into 2 separate trains, great but limited or no use over most of the routes.

Much better approach would be to have continuous 12-carriage trains.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2018, 13:48:26 »

On another service it is just as likely to see the revenue inspectors on a service, so was wondering why it is deemed acceptable to buy a ticket on some services but can be given a penalty fair on others?

Often depends on how commission hungry the staff are!

I’ve been on services where the train manager has raced ahead of the RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector (or Retail Price Index, depending on the context)) asking only for people who need to purchase tickets. I guess it also gives a stronger case then for the RPI if the TM(resolve) has done this
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2018, 14:18:39 »

Are we beginning to see the folly of the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) dictating that 5 car units were ordered rather than 9 car units.

Aren't these trains DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) Huh? perhaps with the train manager giving the driver the signal to close the doors as is done on Cross Country, who also incidentally seem to operate units in multiple without a connecting gangway between the units.


I am also perplexed by this as GWR (Great Western Railway) already operate multiple units without a connecting gangway (165/166) with a single set of staff and sometimes just a driver, so cannot understand why they need so many staff for operating 2x5 IET (Intercity Express Train)'s.
Is this because the 165/166 are operating in DOO land (aka the Thames Valley) and the IET's aren't?
What would happen if 2x5 IET worked London - Oxford would it need 3 staff members?
Are 3 members of staff required for multiple operated 165/166 in the Bristol area?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2018, 14:41:14 »

Still bemused why the Government|DfT» (Department for Transport - about)|NR» (Network Rail - home page) should decide to replace 8-carriage HST (High Speed Train) with 2x5-carriage IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.).

It was always going to need more staff, and if the powers that be thought the flexibility of of separating 2x5-carraige IEPS into 2 separate trains, great but limited or no use over most of the routes.

Much better approach would be to have continuous 12-carriage trains.

Agree, I can see the merit of a few half length trains for portion working and for lightly used services, but I feel that the order should have been mainly full length trains with a limited number of half length units. Rather than what was actually specified of mainly 5 car.

Considering the present degree of overcrowding, it wont be long until there are calls to extend the new trains. I would hope that this would consist of lengthening some 5 car units to 9 or 10 car, rather than adding just one vehicle to a 9 car unit.

Increasing some units from 5 car to 9 car has the merit of keeping a uniform fleet of only 2 types of train, whilst increasing the proportion of that fleet that is full length.

Increasing from 5 car to 10 car provides even more capacity, but means that the fleet now contains 3 types of train. A 10 car electric unit also needs TWO "get you home" diesel engines, whilst a 9 car needs only one.
That objection is probably more theoretical than actual however since full electrification is receding into the distance.
And if electrification DOES happen quicker, then there will be plenty of coaches with engines.

5 car bi mode has three engines. If lengthened to 10 car, two engines can be used with one being removed.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2018, 15:07:33 »

There are 35 9-car sets (800 and 802s) that are on order and have yet to be introduced into service.  Those 35 sets (comprising 315 carriages) will no doubt form a very healthy percentage of the final timetabled services, rather than 0% currently, so the number of 2x5car trains operating daily probably won't be that much more extensive than they are now.  The 58 5-car sets (comprising 290 carriages) will give the flexibility to form both the quieter services off-peak and at the extremes of the network, and form 10-car services in the peak to help supplement the 9-car trains.

I would like to think the 9-car trains will be extended to 10-car first as that would have the greatest impact on seating capacity at the minimal cost (that extra carriage would need to have an engine though).  If you extend the 5-car trains to anything other than 9 or 10-cars then you lose the flexibility of portion working, but perhaps extending a few 5-car trains to 9 or 10-cars would be the next step to take after extending 9-car trains to 10-car ones.  Options are available, providing the money can be found.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2018, 15:20:48 »

Fair points here - the suspension of electrification into Bristol and Bath is the root of this issue, leading to the 2x5 car trains coming into service first. But why drag an empty 5 car unit around, rather than detaching it and leaving it in a siding? Unless of course it will be given additional staff when it gets back to Temple Meads en route to Paddington, but that seems to defeat the original ideas behind having the bi-mode units.

Curious. In fact, bi-curious.
Logged

Now, please!
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2018, 15:54:20 »

Fair points here - the suspension of electrification into Bristol and Bath is the root of this issue, leading to the 2x5 car trains coming into service first. But why drag an empty 5 car unit around, rather than detaching it and leaving it in a siding? Unless of course it will be given additional staff when it gets back to Temple Meads en route to Paddington, but that seems to defeat the original ideas behind having the bi-mode units.

Curious. In fact, bi-curious.

very good.  Your suggestion of leaving the dead train in the siding assumes that there is a siding and the path to go and collect the train again. 

Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2018, 15:59:12 »

Running a 5+5 car train, with 5 locked out of use may have been insisted upon by Hitachi.
Running a single 5 car unit, though more logical might have resulted in a public perception that the costly new trains were not available in sufficient numbers to run the advertised services. Cynics like me might even have been tempted to say "Voyager"

Running two units with one locked out of use makes it clear that this is a GWR (Great Western Railway) staffing issue and not a "new train broken" problem.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2018, 16:01:32 »

There may be a few issues going on here. Coupling and decoupling units doesn't seem to be happening routinely yet in stations as should eventually be the case, so they are going around in pairs all the time (except if one develops a fault).

I think that when that is sorted out, much of the time the service from Weston would be one 5-car unit, coupled to another when this reaches Bristol, and sometimes a 9-car all the way through.

Coupling and uncoupling of carriages etc to match demand or serve branches used to be a almost a signature feature of the original GWR (Great Western Railway) and carried on through BR (British Rail(ways)) (W) but I think it will take some time for this to become slick and it is not apparent enough attention has been given to this (at least as yet). This can also be seen in relation to the 387 units (4/8/12).
Logged
Chris125
Full Member
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2018, 17:04:11 »

IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) there's a union agreement about who can staff both units which obviously reduces flexibility, as more staff are trained up on them this should become less of an issue.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2018, 17:50:18 »

Running two units with one locked out of use makes it clear that this is a GWR (Great Western Railway) staffing issue and not a "new train broken" problem.
Much to the annoyance of all those passengers crammed into a five car set knowing full well that behind them is 5 carriages carrying fresh air. Still, I suppose better than no service at all but was predicted would happen.

GWR need to nip this in the bud pretty quick as this is not good PR (Public Relations) for their new trains. If the media get a hold that this is happening on a regular basis they will have a field day. You can see the headline “Brand new trains running around carrying fresh air not passengers”.

As II points out, once the 9 car sets are in service, they will replace some of the 10 car diagrams that only really require 9 cars.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 05, 2018, 17:54:27 »

IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) there's a union agreement about who can staff both units which obviously reduces flexibility, as more staff are trained up on them this should become less of an issue.

You mean there is an agreement between GWR (Great Western Railway) and the Union about....

It takes two to tango
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page