Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:15 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 16:32:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Hydrogen Trains  (Read 21841 times)
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2018, 17:06:12 »

I think I may have précised the piece too severely. It went on to say it would only be viable to produced hydrogen from electric from renewables.

I thought the bit about the hydrogen tanks being on the roof would be more controversial.

It did also say you would need an armoured floor if they were on the underframe.
Logged
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2018, 08:42:15 »

Paul Baltrop reports...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-bristol-42782942/hydrogen-trains-could-bridge-gaps-in-electrification
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1336



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2018, 09:35:13 »

In promoting this Grayling seems to be ignoring the high cost of producing hydrogen as well as the possible safety issues relating to a high pressure container of highly flammable gas.  Is he clutching at straws to justify his stance on electification?
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2018, 11:45:47 »

In promoting this Grayling seems to be ignoring the high cost of producing hydrogen as well as the possible safety issues relating to a high pressure container of highly flammable gas.  Is he clutching at straws to justify his stance on electification?

It has to be a smokescreen. Surely even Grayling doesn't really think this makes sense? Or is he pandering to the traditional fuel distribution lobby who, as I understand it, like the idea of hydrogen as it would give them something to distribute. 

Interesting that he mentioned battery-electric trains, sort of under his breath and in passing...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2018, 20:16:22 »

In promoting this Grayling seems to be ignoring the high cost of producing hydrogen as well as the possible safety issues relating to a high pressure container of highly flammable gas.  Is he clutching at straws to justify his stance on electification?

Is he promoting anything? I don't think so, and I suspect he'd deny it too.

Most of the media comments are down to Minsterologists with hyperactive tea leaves and a politician spinning a decision made to save money. I've said before that only electrification with benefit many times its estimated cost is going to get a tick from him, as he does not trust NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s estimates. So, for example, a four-minute time saving to Swansea isn't enough, given that the same money could be spent on a bit of line speed improvement instead. In those statements he's announcing a departmental decision, and speaking for the likes of NR as well.

But as to promoting hydrogen - or any other solution for a particular line - I don't see that he is. His function is rather that his decisions are based on proposals from others (NR, but not only). He may even decide in terms of journeys made by people, not trains on specific lines. At the moment he is saying that the options considered for those proposals should not be just the familiar ones, and "I don't want to find that there is a cheaper option that no-one has even looked at" (said with as much menace as a Grayling can manage).

Hence hydrogen, as one one those options. But given that Alstom are only just starting their first operational trial (two units), with first production units due in 2021 to one brave (or or suitably compensated) German Land, when would any decision be made? Long after he's gone, even if he lasts longer than the usual two years.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 23, 2018, 22:34:27 »

Fair enough; maybe it's one of those irregular verbs:

I seek ways of justifying neoliberalism
You think you're going to get alternatively-powered trains
He/She/It hopes to gain a more fashionable ministerial post sooner rather than later
We see through the dissembling
You don't get the investment you need
They get booted out at the next election.

Or something.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2018, 11:48:50 »

I suspect that some of this ministerial talk of hydrogen is a delaying tactic to avoid actually doing anything now or in the near future.
Whenever there is a risk of actually having to do something, this may be postponed by proposing something else, preferably something not yet proven.

Electrification sounded a good idea but has degenerated into a vote loosing fiasco. So perhaps politicians could promote battery trains instead ? Well that was tried, but unfortunately battery technology has progressed to the extent that a battery train could be built right now with "off the shelf" components. Buy some battery trains ?
"oh no, we cant have that, better to move on to talk about hydrogen in years to come, rather than buying a small fleet of branch line battery trains right now".
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2018, 15:39:28 »

Didn't we go through all this hype with the magical ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.) moving block for the West Coast modernisation?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 26, 2018, 15:28:12 »

Yes, and another comparison would attempts to delay HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) by looking at newer and more innovative technologies such as maglev or monorails, rather than getting on and starting to a build a conventional high speed line as being built elsewhere.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: January 26, 2018, 15:38:14 »

Back to hydrogen trains. interesting comment in a letter to Modern railways,

German trains will be used on lines without tunnels! Suggests roof mounted tanks could be a fire hazard ir they leaked in tunnels of which we have quite a lot.

Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 26, 2018, 18:22:11 »


So I am not allowed within 3.5m of a 25kV wire but I can travel in a carriage with 94kg of hydrogen at 350-700bar (atmospheres) above my head. This gas is notorious for leaking (it can diffuse through solids), ignites over limits of 4 - 75%, exploding between 18 - 60%. Even diesels (a relatively safe fuel that can quench a lighted match) are restricted in single line tunnels.

Catch a bus instead,

OTC



Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 26, 2018, 20:17:10 »

Catch a bus instead,

One of these?



 Tongue
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1468


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: January 26, 2018, 20:22:33 »

I note many hi-viz on board.  Demo run perhaps?
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 26, 2018, 21:04:48 »


So I am not allowed within 3.5m of a 25kV wire but I can travel in a carriage with 94kg of hydrogen at 350-700bar (atmospheres) above my head. This gas is notorious for leaking (it can diffuse through solids), ignites over limits of 4 - 75%, exploding between 18 - 60%. Even diesels (a relatively safe fuel that can quench a lighted match) are restricted in single line tunnels.

Catch a bus instead,

OTC

You might have added that hydrogen leaking through small holes tends to self-ignite due to charge separation, and when burned it has a high volumetric energy content. But its gravimetric (specific) energy content is similar to other fuel gases, it's just much less dense. So when released, if not confined or ignited, it doesn't hang about but legs it for the stratosphere.

In my limited experience of hydrogen explosions (just the one, though big), it was the mechanical explosion that did the blast damage, with the initial hydrogen fire only secondary. Mind you, that tank was attached to a lot of chemical engineering, full of much more hydrogen and a wide range of hydrocarbons (also in the tank that blew up), and they did cause a BLEVE and a big fire.

But if you are worried about pressure vessels that might explode, there are not just hydrogen buses, but other gases (of various origins, some greener than others) in buses, cars, and (at least potentially) trains.  And ones that don't do transport, and could go bang without your even knowing they were there.

But doesn't a lot of that apply to steam engines too? Not just their well-attested historical habit of going pop, but the release of very hot steam in confined spaces too. I think you should at least keep clear of steam multiple units...
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2018, 10:15:56 »

Ultimately, if you are going to insist on shifting large heavy things round then you will need to store or transmit decent amounts of energy to do it, and that is inherently dangerous. A Shire horse can easily kill a person if they get on the wrong side of it!
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page