Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:52:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[199] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[62] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[34] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[26] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[25] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: GWRF2020-04 Relationship between Network Rail and train operator  (Read 2263 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 30, 2017, 08:16:56 »

Consultation Question 4

a) What do you think are the main challenges that might be addressed through greater co-ordination and integration between the train operator and Network Rail?
b) What do you think should be the future priorities for strengthened partnership working between the franchise operator and Network Rail?



Explanatory text

Close collaboration between Network Rail and franchise operators is critical in providing a safe and reliable service for passengers. Effective collaboration requires strong leadership to encourage and demonstrate the right behaviours, and a focus on passengers’ needs throughout each organisation, with an overall aim of achieving clear accountability, aligned objectives and collaborative working. The current franchisee and Network Rail’s Western Route have already made significant efforts in this direction, including through their Alliance Framework Agreement and setting up the Western Route Supervisory Board, comprised of Network Rail and representatives from the train operators on the route and a representative from Transport Focus.

Important aspects of collaboration between Network Rail and franchise operators include:
●● Day-to-day operations, where collaboration helps smooth operation of the railway. This is particularly important during disruptions, in order to provide clear and accurate information to passengers and to restore services as quickly as possible to minimise disruption;
●● Alignment of objectives and targets between the operator and Network Rail, e.g. on punctuality targets;
●● Maintaining and improving the network: Network Rail needs access to the network to carry out maintenance and improvement work, meaning that there are times when passenger services cannot operate or are reduced in frequency. Current industry mechanisms for agreeing this access can result in opposing incentives for Network Rail and passenger operators. Collaboration can allow better ‘whole industry’ decisions to be made in the best interests of passengers, e.g. cutting back last services on some days of the week when demand is low to allow later services to operate on other days when demand for late-evening services is higher.
●● Planning and delivery of major enhancement schemes: Many more complex rail upgrade schemes require a combination of changes to the infrastructure, usually planned and carried out by Network Rail, and changes to the train service, which are the responsibility of the franchisee. Successful delivery depends on integrating these aspects throughout the enhancement scheme. Managing these interfaces in major enhancements can be challenging, especially where multiple organisations are involved, and any changes to one aspect of the project can have significant consequences for others. Successful delivery is aided by having a single party with overall accountability for achieving the intended outcomes of such schemes.

We will expect the next Great Western franchise to build further on the existing collaboration with Network Rail, which could include a stronger joint partnership approach to developing and designing future train service and infrastructure enhancement schemes.

See http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19037 for the background to this topic
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2017, 09:06:06 »

discussion

There is certainly a need for Network Rail and Train Operators to work well together, and evidence that the current relationship fails to be perfect at times.   To a very great extent, Network Rail hide from passengers behind the train operators, who are required to take service responsibility and indeed carry the can for a broken service, even where the breakage could be traced to Network Rail.

At a somewhat deeper level (once you get involved in campaigning / as a community partner) you find the uneasy feeling that the interface between Network Rail and train operators is a convenient way of both sides reducing their activities when it comes to day to day operational incidents / issues to their contactual limits, with a convenient implicit (or unofficially explicit) suggestion that it's down to the other side.    Smoke and Mirrors!.  And it's very hard to know what the actual truth is - certainly there's a suspicion that more could be done where something's not quite right, but that it's in the TOC (Train Operating Company) and NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s interests to do little extra across their interface, which seems to have zero passenger representation on it, and at times zero interest in the plight of passengers.

I note that Network Rail used to have some people - just a handful of them - who's role it was to interface to the community.   That group has now gone.   I note that getting a meeting with Network Rail, even with official DfT» (Department for Transport - about) / ACoRP (Association of Community Rail Partnerships) designated service "authority", and / or with local authority (local PTA (Passenger Transport Authority) level) is "difficult".  I'm minded this week of a meeting that's been sought for several months - since the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) consolation on timetables was launched in September.   It did eventually take place on 21st December after numerous dates had been suggested, held, postponed.   The meeting lead was utterly frustrated, and it was well nigh impossible to make use of the outcome of the meeting in the consultation response which was due in ... by close of business on 22nd December.

I'm documenting issues here; for sure an area that needs attention, but I don't feel I know how that attention should be given.   It's so hidden from the public that I doubt (m)any passengers can come up with realistic inputs  to the GW (Great Western) franchise consultation on this one - unless you know better?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2018, 10:22:36 »

The only real way of achieving good integration between the TOCS and Network Rail is to rejoin the Wheel and Rail.

Unfortunately this  means one organisation will have day to day control of a complete geographic area., which goes against current economic dictats that Rail must compete with Rail.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2018, 11:41:31 »

The only real way of achieving good integration between the TOCS and Network Rail is to rejoin the Wheel and Rail.

Unfortunately this  means one organisation will have day to day control of a complete geographic area., which goes against current economic dictats that Rail must compete with Rail.

Simple solution............... It used to be called British Rail (now where is that tin hat?)  Grin
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2018, 21:48:18 »

Near in mind that SWTs (South West Trains) tie-in with NR» (Network Rail - home page) failed owing to them losing any & all delay compensation from NR. A lot of money that no one was willing to compensate them for losing. So that needs solving in other TOC (Train Operating Company)/NR tie-ups
Logged
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2018, 15:03:07 »

Simple give the TOC (Train Operating Company) full control of the network it operates, with control of the budget and allow companies to bid for each contract, or use network rail as a service provider.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2018, 15:13:40 »

Simple give the TOC (Train Operating Company) full control of the network it operates, with control of the budget and allow companies to bid for each contract, or use network rail as a service provider.

You have - err - one day to write in with that / include it in your response.  I rather thought that Network Rail is already a service provider to the TOCs - though one that has a monopoly.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page