Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:20 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:57:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: GWR - Rail Business of the Year  (Read 10218 times)
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2018, 08:57:38 »

And it's not even 1st April!
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 24, 2018, 09:34:26 »

What are the chances of the award presentation ceremony being cancelled due to shortage of white collar crew to receive it?
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2018, 09:39:57 »

Sometimes it seems that the more derisory we are of GWR (Great Western Railway), the more contemptuous
they are, of us ! Sad
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2018, 09:51:24 »

Sometimes it seems that the more derisory we are of GWR (Great Western Railway), the more contemptuous
they are, of us ! Sad

And I really can't blame them for that ... works the other way too.  The more respect and constructive feedback and help we give them, the more respect and constructive help they give us.  Not saying we couldn't do with more constructive help - far too often they can be very frustrating to deal with ... but there are some real gems of feedback and the odd tiny change that can make a big difference.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 24, 2018, 10:04:09 »

Sometimes it seems that the more derisory we are of GWR (Great Western Railway), the more contemptuous
they are, of us ! Sad

And I really can't blame them for that ... works the other way too.  The more respect and constructive feedback and help we give them, the more respect and constructive help they give us.  Not saying we couldn't do with more constructive help - far too often they can be very frustrating to deal with ... but there are some real gems of feedback and the odd tiny change that can make a big difference.

Respect is earned, not given.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 24, 2018, 11:17:53 »

OK folks ... point made. 

I note that we're far from alone in having problems at the moment - looking at Southern and Northern groups that fulfil some of the functions of our Western one, and even in Scotland ...

Were a problem to be purely in one franchise, logic would be to blame it mostly on something specific to that franchise. But where problems exist in so many places, and with different franchise operators, much more we should look at common factors such as their common suppliers and / or the system and environment they work in, including customer expectations.

Yes, infrastructure faults are generally down to network rail as are the electrification delays.
The new trains are not proving a complete success, but were largely specified by DaFt.
Industrial disputes are arguable either way.

So a fair bit of the problems are not the fault of GWR (Great Western Railway), and broadly similar arguments apply to other franchises.

However some of the problems do seem to me to be the fault of GWR. Failure to reply in a timely fashion to correspondence for example.
I also blame GWR for failing to recruit and retain enough staff, despite the statement by a respected member that GWR have met their franchise requirements in this respect.
I certainly blame GWR for a costly advertising campagain that raises customer expectations even further beyond what is actually delivered.

And finally I don't mind GWR taking a bit of reputational damage for things are not in fact their fault, because they have routinely implied that THEY are funding the new trains and the electrification works.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 26, 2018, 21:15:20 »

OK folks ... point made. 

I note that we're far from alone in having problems at the moment - looking at Southern and Northern groups that fulfil some of the functions of our Western one, and even in Scotland ...

Were a problem to be purely in one franchise, logic would be to blame it mostly on something specific to that franchise. But where problems exist in so many places, and with different franchise operators, much more we should look at common factors such as their common suppliers and / or the system and environment they work in, including customer expectations.

Yes, infrastructure faults are generally down to network rail as are the electrification delays.
The new trains are not proving a complete success, but were largely specified by DaFt.
Industrial disputes are arguable either way.

So a fair bit of the problems are not the fault of GWR (Great Western Railway), and broadly similar arguments apply to other franchises.

However some of the problems do seem to me to be the fault of GWR. Failure to reply in a timely fashion to correspondence for example.
I also blame GWR for failing to recruit and retain enough staff, despite the statement by a respected member that GWR have met their franchise requirements in this respect.
I certainly blame GWR for a costly advertising campagain that raises customer expectations even further beyond what is actually delivered.

And finally I don't mind GWR taking a bit of reputational damage for things are not in fact their fault, because they have routinely implied that THEY are funding the new trains and the electrification works.

Track/signal issues are down to Network Rail's poor management. IET (Intercity Express Train)/HST (High Speed Train) short formed trains is due to more trains being sent off lease when we really need them, GWR have lost quite a few 150/1 and 2 or 3 HST sets recently, all down to the DFT (Department for Transport) who seems to be throwing every resource at Northern Rail to shut them up(apart from the HSTs). We then have the IET's which are slowly being introduced and lack of staff familiarity being the main issue(don't forget most drivers are having to update themselves from trains built 41 years ago where there was very little electronics)

We also have the fact that most of the 150s/165/166s are knackered and could either do with brand new engines or in some cases ideally complete replacement, things take time to bed in but my only surprise is that the Severn Beach branch is still having issues.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 08, 2018, 08:42:02 »

OK folks ... point made. 

I note that we're far from alone in having problems at the moment - looking at Southern and Northern groups that fulfil some of the functions of our Western one, and even in Scotland ...

Were a problem to be purely in one franchise, logic would be to blame it mostly on something specific to that franchise. But where problems exist in so many places, and with different franchise operators, much more we should look at common factors such as their common suppliers and / or the system and environment they work in, including customer expectations.


Accepted Grahame, but haven't the judges enough guts to make 'No Award' for this year rather than making a mockery of the award.

Thats my final comment on this subject.

Not quite, whilst travelling home yesterday from Taunton by car, rail travel too unreliable these days, the Beeb news broadcast was reporting the grovelling apology the promoters of the whole event were making for including a "tawdry sex comedy" and "a fake terrorist incident" scenes in the evenings entertainment. Mark Carne was reported as saying that Network Rail would be handing back their award to the organisers.

If Mark Hopwood had a conscience he too would be handing back GWR (Great Western Railway)'s award saying, "We didn't deserve it".
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 08, 2018, 08:59:33 »

From the Standard

Quote
Organisers of a major rail industry awards have been forced to apologise after the ceremony featured a mock terror attack that guests called "appalling".

The UK (United Kingdom) Rail Industry Awards, hosted by comedian Rufus Hound in Battersea, was held on the first anniversary of the Westminster Bridge terror attack.

Rail staff and other transport officials were on the frontline responding to terrorist attacks in the past year with the British Transport Police attending the aftermath of the Westminster atrocity.

Bosses issued a grovelling apology for the performance including spoof terror stunt as well as women dressed in provocative leather outfits.

Toby Rackliff, who attended, vented his outrage on Twitter writing: "Providing a fake terrorist attack as 'entertainment' in year following #LondonBridge & #MENArena tragedies, which saw huge acts of courage & compassion by @BTP (British Transport Police) & #railstaff, shows (at best) crass insensitivity & an appalling error of judgment by @UKRIAnews & @rtmnews."

A rail source meanwhile told the Times: "They had simulated terrorist attack with people coming down from the ceiling. The host made some crude jokes that were really derogatory towards women and other attendees."

According to the Times, Network Rail and Chiltern Railways returned awards in protest at the entertainment.

Simon Rennie, general manager at the National Training Academy for Rail (NTAR), which won the award for apprenticeship development, meanwhile wrote in Rail Technology Magazine: "Re-enacting terrorism allied to foul-mouthed hosting encapsulated violence, bullying, placing individuals under duress and crass gender-stereotyping."

On the night of the awards, as the show progressed, guests took to Twitter to call it "weird" and "ridiculous".

"Things just got weird," wrote one attendee while another said: "Ridiculous start of the show. Unnecessary gimmicks ... Not good."

Roy Rowlands, managing director of the event, wrote in a statement that he was "very sorry" for the "poor judgment" that led to the "inappropriate" entertainment.

We will live with the pain every day, Westminster attack survivors say

He said: "I can assure you that this content was most certainly not in the script and does not reflect the values and opinions of UKRIA, Rail Technology Magazine and its owners and employees of Cognitive Publishing Ltd.

"Formal complaints have been issued to both the host and the stunt performers expressing our deep concerns."

He added: "I’m saddened that we have unwillingly subjected our guests and ourselves with the views of 'tawdry performers' that neither you nor we believe in or condone."

The fee paid for the act will be returned and given to funds set up for the London Westminster Bridge attack, Manchester Arena attack and women's rights charity the Fawcett Society.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 08, 2018, 09:01:48 »

You couldn’t make it up.

I fully expect GWR (Great Western Railway) will return their award too.

What a disgraceful performance all round from the ceremony itself and the undeserving awards handed out.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 08, 2018, 15:05:41 »

The apologies in full from the event organiser, Roy Rowlands, Managing Director at Cognitive Publishing, publishers of Rail Technology Magazine:

http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/ukria-2018-apology-statement

An MD taking full responsibility for his, and his company's failings. Perhaps the MD of the rail business of the year could learn a thing or two...
« Last Edit: April 08, 2018, 15:13:45 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: April 08, 2018, 15:13:43 »

The apologies in full from organisers, Rail Technology Magazine:

http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/ukria-2018-apology-statement

Perhaps the most telling comment;

"How come no-one said anything at the time?"

...............amazing what a cheap gong & a few gallons of Corporate champagne can make some people overlook........
« Last Edit: April 08, 2018, 15:23:05 by TaplowGreen » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 08, 2018, 15:26:31 »

Rufus Hound is certainly not who you’d invite to host an awards ceremony if you wanted to play it safe.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 08, 2018, 15:56:38 »

Does anyone know, how realistic was the "fake terrorist incident" ?
It would have been unfortunate if someone believed it to be an actual attack, and killed one of the "terrorists" perhaps by battering them with furniture or a fire extinguisher.
In an ACTUAL attack such actions would be considered heroic.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 08, 2018, 16:00:33 »

Rufus Hound is certainly not who you’d invite to host an awards ceremony if you wanted to play it safe.

He seems to spend his "career" issuing apologies which are almost as frequent as GWRs (Great Western Railway) and approaching the same level of sincerity.

Here's another little gem.............

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvR8JfBUakk
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page