Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:49:48 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[199] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[62] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[34] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[26] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[25] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Problems with new Class 385 Trains in Scotland  (Read 2581 times)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« on: March 07, 2018, 16:15:05 »

This sounds a very reasoned argument from ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about)

http://www.aslef.org.uk/article.php?group_id=6091

Quote
Fish bowl vision problem scuppers plans for new trains - 12 February 2018

ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, has called on Humza Yousaf, Minister for Transport in the Scottish government, to ensure that ScotRail’s new trains are fit for purpose – and warned that unless modifications are made to ensure the trains are safe, drivers will refuse to work them.

Kevin Lindsay, ASLEF’s organiser in Scotland, said: ‘There’s a problem with the new Class 385 units that Transport Scotland and ScotRail have purchased. The windscreen is curved and, at night, is making drivers see two signals. It’s like looking through a fish bowl all the time. ScotRail is trying to get Hitachi to come up with a solution but, so far, I’m afraid, they have failed. I’ve informed ScotRail that we won’t allow these trains to come into service like this.’

The new Class 385 electric multiple unit is being built by Hitachi for ScotRail. The train company has ordered 70 (46 three-car and 24 four-car sets) to run from Glasgow to Edinburgh via Falkirk. They were due to come into service next month (March).

‘The effect of the squashed window means that the window is giving the impression that drivers are looking through a fish bowl to view signals,’ said Kevin. ‘I have advised the company that if this problem is not resolved to our satisfaction then we will inform our members that the trains are not safe to drive in the dark.’

Drivers on a recent test run travelling between Glasgow Central and Paisley Gilmour Street immediately became aware of problems viewing of signals from the driver’s cab while sitting at Glasgow Central waiting to leave. They reported: ‘We could see a reflection of the signals on the right hand side – showing two signals. This was even more noticeable when approaching signals travelling between Glasgow Central and Paisley when, on some occasions, we could view two or three signals when we should have been viewing only one.’

Kevin added: ‘The safety of passengers – and train crew – is absolutely paramount in the rail industry. ASLEF welcomes investment in new rolling stock and new infrastructure, but it has to be fit for purpose. That’s why I’m calling on the minister to ensure these trains are safe when they come into service.’

Further info on the new trains here: https://www.railengineer.uk/2018/02/07/on-board-scotrails-new-class-385/ and here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-43031527
« Last Edit: March 07, 2018, 18:26:30 by SandTEngineer » Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2018, 16:33:48 »

1960?

Class 303?


Edit: Ahh... reference in the OP (Original Poster / topic starter) to similar events in 1960 has been removed.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2018, 16:37:14 »

1960?

Class 303?


Edit: Ahh... reference in the OP (Original Poster / topic starter) to similar events in 1960 has been removed.
Sorry BNM Imust have been editing my post as you were reading it Roll Eyes  I removed my reference to 1960 as I thought younger members on here might not have a clue what I was on about and I remembered that was all about exploding transformers, not windscreens..... Tongue
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2018, 16:53:04 »

I heard that last month, but it wasn't clear if it was serious. I also didn't realise the AT200s were that shape - that's a very sharp curve round to the side of those windows, isn't it? I can imagine that could be like - well, more of a jam jar, really.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2018, 16:57:59 »

Class 303s did have curved windscreens. As did the later Class 310 and 311. I wonder if these had reflection issues too. Reading elsewhere on the internet, it's suggested that the 303, 310, and 311s were retrofitted with toughened flat windscreens because the curved windscreens shattered too easily when struck, either deliberately by stone throwing vandals, or by ballast thrown up.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2018, 17:16:52 »

Class 303s did have curved windscreens. As did the later Class 310 and 311. I wonder if these had reflection issues too. Reading elsewhere on the internet, it's suggested that the 303, 310, and 311s were retrofitted with toughened flat windscreens because the curved windscreens shattered too easily when struck, either deliberately by stone throwing vandals, or by ballast thrown up.
And very pricey to replace!
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1336



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2018, 18:24:45 »

I am sure that there was a similar issue with the Class 309 (Clacton) units
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
MrC
Full Member
***
Posts: 45


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2018, 15:19:18 »

Class 303s did have curved windscreens. As did the later Class 310 and 311. I wonder if these had reflection issues too. Reading elsewhere on the internet, it's suggested that the 303, 310, and 311s were retrofitted with toughened flat windscreens because the curved windscreens shattered too easily when struck, either deliberately by stone throwing vandals, or by ballast thrown up.

And for a (slightly) more current unit - see the class 442. I can't remember any similar issues driving them but it could be down to the relationship between screen, driving desk and seat. Certainly no more issues with screens breaking than with classic Desiros but screen replacements were very expensive.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2018, 12:06:54 »

I am sure that there was a similar issue with the Class 309 (Clacton) units

Weren't they rebuilt with flat screens.

Fantastic units 0-60 in the lenght of the platform! Plus when first in service superb steak baps from the Griddle.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2018, 19:32:24 »

If your job is designing trains, and you are asked for one with a gangway in the end, you'll probably want to make the windows used by the driver as big as possible in the space that's left. You may well be tempted to curve the window around onto the side, roughly matching the curvature of the body shell. Unfortunately, that has optical implications.

Bending glass will naturally lead to a nearly constant thickness, which results in the outer face having a bigger radius of curvature than the inner one. Those different curvatures mean it's a lens: but a cylindrical diverging one in this case. At first sight that's the wrong kind - it would make light paths diverge while, for two images to be seen, light paths have to converge after passing through separated areas of the window.

There are two reasons why that might still happen. One is the that this lens is curved as a whole, through a right angle, leading to some parts being passed through at oblique angles. Simple "thin lens" theory doesn't cover that, and the appropriate "thick lens" analysis is out of scope for here. The other factor is that outside the curved area the glass is flat; light paths diverging from each other in the curve will converge with undeviated paths via the flat parts. A quick look at the sums suggests that the overall effect is big enough, but it's not easy to say how much of the field of view it affects - but then we are told that drivers have seen it happen.

So the effect isn't anything strange, inexplicable, or even surprising. You would think Hitachi's design teams would be aware of it as a possibility, and if not would have spotted it in initial design checking and proving. And then there's the history - a quick look at the online pictures of old British EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) and DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) (plenty of those!) would show some with odd-looking windows that were obviously modified to remove such a curve. Which, even without knowing for sure why, is a big hint.

So, no excuses on this one - careless design.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2018, 09:29:18 »

I heard that last month, but it wasn't clear if it was serious. I also didn't realise the AT200s were that shape - that's a very sharp curve round to the side of those windows, isn't it? I can imagine that could be like - well, more of a jam jar, really.

Looking at another picture of a 385, I realised I'd misunderstood the shape of that front window. The very curved part I saw was actually the body shell, and the window glass itself is almost flat. It is, however, sharply angled both vertically (i.e. raked) and, even more so, horizontally. It's hard to judge that angle or the curvature from any one still photo.

The shape of the window opening is also very confusing. There's a view over the driver's shoulder in that Rail Engineer article in which the opening looks perfectly rectangular, and not skewed at all. I think this is the eye/brain jumping to illusory conclusions based on assumed right angles and perspective. In reality the shape has no parallel sides or right angles, as well as not being a plane figure at all.

That all makes it hard to work out what might be going on, so even opening out my envelope to use the inside won't help.  The skew angle and glass thickness must be important, and perhaps the glass isn't uniform thickness, most likely towards the edges. If it is an edge effect, the simplest fix would be to blank out that part. However, the view is already very restricted by the opening and that protruding gangway, so even a small loss of that looks problematical.

None of which alters the conclusion - all concerned accept it's a real issue, and the fault is entirely Hitachi's.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 15, 2018, 09:35:54 »

None of which alters the conclusion - all concerned accept it's a real issue, and the fault is entirely Hitachi's.

I also found this in another rail Engineer article:
Quote
The AT200 trains that ScotRail have procured are the Class 385 EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) and have a feature unique to the Hitachi’s AT series trains. This is due to the requirement for the Class 385s to have the “ability to support at-seat catering which is available to all passengers”. This innocuous sounding phrase in Transport Scotland’s franchise specification requires a front-end corridor connection.

This unique aspect of the Class 385 required a modified design that had to consider crash worthiness, driver ergonomics and possible driver sighting issues. To optimise the cab and interior design, Hitachi engaged the services of the University of Liverpool’s Virtual Engineering Centre (VEC). VEC was also used to get feedback from drivers and train crews as part of the design process to ensure their buy-in.

So Hitachi may be having "ongoing discussions at a higher level than usual" with their suppliers/consultants/collaborators*, but as design authority the buck is still all their own.

*Draw the pen through such of the words as are inappropriate.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page