Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here]. Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
April 25, 2018, 08:47:16 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[233] Letter from GWR M.D. Mark Hopwood
[81] First to revise services in West Wilts
[35] Box Tunnel at sunrise on Brunel's birthday (9 April) - merged top...
[34] Turbos on Severn Beach line from 03 Jul 17
[29] Open Train Times live signalling maps
[28] Where were bignosemac and Finn today, 20th April 2018.
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Passenger sends the bailiffs in to Greater Anglia  (Read 1839 times)
richwarwicker
TransWilts Member
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2993

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile Email
« on: March 13, 2018, 10:46:17 am »

I imagine some other TOCs will be watching this very carefully.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-43310621

Quote
A commuter fed up with "continually" delayed trains has won a legal bid for compensation against the rail company.
Seph Pochin, of Halesworth, Suffolk, had described the service between his home and Ipswich as "woeful", with one train delayed by 100 minutes.
A warrant has now been issued for bailiffs to seize Greater Anglia (GA) property after it failed to pay him 350 compensation.
GA confirmed it was in a legal dispute with Mr Pochin but could not comment.
Mr Pochin, an ecologist, who moved to Halesworth a year ago, said he was considering moving to Ipswich to avoid the delays, which he claims added up to almost 28 hours over 12 months.
Between February 2017 and February 2018, he made 550 journeys and recorded 183 delays.
According to his figures, the majority of trains were between one and 10 minutes late.
Mr Pochin said 26 journeys were late by more than 15 minutes, with the 100-minute delay on a journey last August.
GA has a delay-repay scheme, paying out compensation for journeys more than 30 minutes late.
Mr Pochin, who corresponded regularly with the firm about the quality of the service, said the 100-minute delay was the last straw.
Using the Consumer Rights Act 2016, he paid 35 to lodge a case at a small claims court "to highlight the regular deficiencies with the service".
Judgement ruling
In September, Mr Pochin and the rail company both agreed to mediation to resolve the matter.
But after GA failed to provide dates to meet, Mr Pochin applied for a judgement ruling, which he won in December, and the train operator was ordered to pay him 350.
In February, after failing to get this money, Mr Pochin paid 77 for a warrant to be served on GA to seize assets worth 350.
The courts and tribunal service confirmed a warrant had been issued against GA, which will now have to pay the sum or face the bailiffs.
GA admitted 23% of delays were "directly attributable to Greater Anglia due to incidents such as train faults".
A spokeswoman said the lines Mr Pochin travels on were being upgraded by Network Rail in a 68m scheme "to make the train service more reliable".
The legislation Mr Pochin used gives rail passengers the same legal protection they receive when paying for other goods and services.
"Hopefully, this case will result in train operators making compensation for delays easier to get," Stephen Joseph, of the Better Transport Group said.
"However, passengers in general don't want compensation, they want trains that run on time."

Logged
Rostock0
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2018, 07:35:32 am »

That's a great story. My experience on GWR is similar: the train I catch is always late: usually by 5-15 minutes, occasionally longer. Never over an hour, because that would trigger compensation under GWRs rules. But the cumulative effect of the ever-present delay is misery.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants