Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 19 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 21:07:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[313] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[65] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[58] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[49] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[28] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[26] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Demand that improving Oxford to Didcot line 'should be priority'  (Read 11448 times)
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2018, 14:46:41 »

In the past GWR (Great Western Railway) (in their previous guise of FGW (First Great Western)) hired in T & T Locos and Coaches to operate between Cardiff and Taunton, and for the Weymouth Wizard on Saturdays.

Whilst the current rolling stock situation persists why can't they do the same now, two sets of 5 ex-virgin Mk 2d's or Mk3's with a EWS (English Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd, now known as DB Schenker Rail (UK (United Kingdom))) or should I say a DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) 67 at each end. A DRS (Direct Rail Services Ltd) 37 at each end would be preferable and a lot of extra revenue would be generated from all over GWR territory and elsewhere from all the enthusiasts not wanting to miss out on the bash behind the growlers.
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 462


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2018, 14:55:10 »

But my question would be why can't GWR (Great Western Railway) come and explain this to there customers? Even if we didn't like the message at least we would know why. As it is passengers just think GWR couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery.

If GWR can send me a letter telling me that there are 1000's of extra seats, surely they can also send me a letter explaining why the seats on our services have been cut by 33% and that they have plan to rectify it.

I assume that GWR just don't care they are just trying to make a profit and the passengers come last; and they wonder why there are calls for renationalisation.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2018, 15:12:18 »

And people think that will improve the communication, for instance?

But otherwise, I agree with you, they could (& ought to be doing so)
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2018, 16:22:26 »

It was something that got a considerable airing at the last Customer Panel meeting held in Didcot back in January, where a few there were affected directly.

Don't know why though the record of that meeting is taking so long to appear on the GWR (Great Western Railway) website for everyone to see not just those who were there.
Logged
chopper1944
Full Member
***
Posts: 49


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2018, 16:58:35 »

 If and when EWR comes to fruition the line between Didcot and Swindon should be four track. How difficult would this be to do now or in the future?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2018, 18:46:25 »

If and when EWR comes to fruition the line between Didcot and Swindon should be four track. How difficult would this be to do now or in the future?

The GWR (Great Western Railway) (the original one) had a programme to do this in the 1930's.  The sections from Didcot to Milton, Wantage to Challow and from Shrivenham to Bourton were quadrified (to borrow a term from FTN) then.

Land was purchased for much of the rest in the 1930's (all the way to Wootton Bassett Jn).

The pinch points will be the A34 underbridge at Milton, Steventon (where the line goes through the village); A420 overbridge (Acorn Bridge) nr Bourton, and the A419 underbridge at Stratton.

There are some significant embankments between Steventon and Wantage that will need widening and quite a deep cutting at Uffington.  The cutting at Grange Drive in Swindon is quite deep, but the proximity to the houses might be an issue here.

There are also a few listed bridges on the route. 

This is all from memory so other please correct if my memory is not correct
Logged
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2018, 14:25:31 »

If and when EWR comes to fruition the line between Didcot and Swindon should be four track. How difficult would this be to do now or in the future?

The GWR (Great Western Railway) (the original one) had a programme to do this in the 1930's.  The sections from Didcot to Milton, Wantage to Challow and from Shrivenham to Bourton were quadrified (to borrow a term from FTN) then.

Land was purchased for much of the rest in the 1930's (all the way to Wootton Bassett Jn).

The pinch points will be the A34 underbridge at Milton, Steventon (where the line goes through the village); A420 overbridge (Acorn Bridge) nr Bourton, and the A419 underbridge at Stratton.

There are some significant embankments between Steventon and Wantage that will need widening and quite a deep cutting at Uffington.  The cutting at Grange Drive in Swindon is quite deep, but the proximity to the houses might be an issue here.

There are also a few listed bridges on the route. 

This is all from memory so other please correct if my memory is not correct

That's interesting, thanks. I was unaware of the (original) GWR widening programme. They did get as far as quadrupling Wantage Road to Challow (which was removed in the 1960s MAS resignalling scheme, then reinstated in 1990!) as well as adding/lengthening other loops on the section. I wonder if NR» (Network Rail - home page) still own the land that was purchased?

As you say the pinch points to widening the line will be Steventon (it's already four-track under the A34 bridge) and NR is making no provision for more than two tracks with its replacement design for the Steventon High St overbridge. From Causeway crossing to Wantage Road should be fairly strightforward.

Further west, in addition to the cutting you mention, there are houses in close proximity to the line at Baulking and Uffington. Also widening the track on the approach to Swindon would be very expensive. Don't see it happening anytime soon unfortunately.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: March 20, 2018, 11:05:40 »

And unless third-party funding comes forward, it won't happen in time for EWR start either. No funding in CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) for this without it.
Logged
Thames Valley Commuter
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 22, 2018, 04:59:56 »

What's the deal on the Turbos being phased out?  Early morning Did to Padd fastish seem to be more Turbos than Electrostars
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #24 on: March 22, 2018, 05:49:09 »

What's the deal on the Turbos being phased out?  Early morning Did to Padd fastish seem to be more Turbos than Electrostars

Good morning ... and welcome to the forum, Thames Valley Commuter - a very early (in the morning) initial post from you - early train to catch?

With electrification not yet completed (and no longer going to Oxford) and with a need to (re)plan timetables to take full account of where the new trains can go, there may not been enough electric trains to go around, and some of the work patterns of a train ("diagrams") may take a train on to an unelectrified line at some point in the day, even if it spends most of its time on Didcot - Paddington.

When the Elizabeth line opens, more (electric) trains will be running from London via Slough and Maidenhead as far as Reading, which will ease the shortage - if there is one - of the current electric units for services to Didcot and Newbury, and when timetables are redrawn to take advantage of those new trains and the changing performance pattern / shorter journey times allowed by the new long distance expresses,  any diagrams that are 99% electric will probably be tweaked to make them 100% electric.

Thames Valley not really my territory - others please follow up with specifics!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2018, 09:15:17 »


With electrification not yet completed (and no longer going to Oxford) and with a need to (re)plan timetables to take full account of where the new trains can go, there may not been enough electric trains to go around, and some of the work patterns of a train ("diagrams") may take a train on to an unelectrified line at some point in the day, even if it spends most of its time on Didcot - Paddington.


Would it not be easier to fit the 387s with batteries that can be recharged once under electrics, or if not small diesel engines which can provide power when not under wires? It seems crazy that GWR (Great Western Railway) ordered all these 387s to boost capacity and now there having to scramble other trains to sort out a DFT (Department for Transport) mess.   The original GWR was ambitious, its a shame the modern era one is less so.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2018, 09:23:50 »

They are doing this with 19 312s (converted class 769) to provide for RDG(resolve)-IXF trains. So a mixture of 769s and IETs (Intercity Express Train) for OXF» (Oxford - next trains)-PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 21, 2018, 16:02:38 »

312s??



Do well to resurrect them and convert to tri-mode.  Tongue
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2018, 16:41:07 »

312s??



Do well to resurrect them and convert to tri-mode.  Tongue

We had the last 2 cars (both trailers) at the Coventry ERM. They're now at Colne Valley with the 308 and 307 cars.

All the rest were cut up over a decade ago. They were comfortable, mid-70's, high performance units with sensible slam-doors that generations had coped with.

Waste,

OTC

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2018, 17:08:06 »

indeed, another typo....319s of course
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page