Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:39:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rail companies launch "Partnership for Britain’s Prosperity"  (Read 7779 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: March 21, 2018, 12:41:49 »

I'm not sure how/whether there are sufficent IETs (Intercity Express Train) to step up to hourly on the semi-fast.....aren't they all allocated (either in service or being serviced)
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #31 on: March 21, 2018, 12:55:06 »

I'm not sure how/whether there are sufficent IETs (Intercity Express Train) to step up to hourly on the semi-fast.....aren't they all allocated (either in service or being serviced)

Oh - it's a pretty good bet that ordering will have been pared down to provide just enough trains to handle the initial requirements and number being serviced at any time.

Looking at London to Exeter - semi-fast every 2 hours is probably 4 trains, rising to 7 trains if you make it every hour. If the London to Exeter semi-fast also takes on the roll of the Bedwyn services, I think that's three trains available to add to the four of the two-hourly service - your same total of 7.   Not sure if long enough is allowed for turn around in these sums, nor it there are proposals to have more complex diagrams to use up the odd spare half hour.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: March 21, 2018, 14:20:40 »

I'm not sure how/whether there are sufficent IETs (Intercity Express Train) to step up to hourly on the semi-fast.....aren't they all allocated (either in service or being serviced)

Oh - it's a pretty good bet that ordering will have been pared down to provide just enough trains to handle the initial requirements and number being serviced at any time.

Looking at London to Exeter - semi-fast every 2 hours is probably 4 trains, rising to 7 trains if you make it every hour. If the London to Exeter semi-fast also takes on the roll of the Bedwyn services, I think that's three trains available to add to the four of the two-hourly service - your same total of 7.   Not sure if long enough is allowed for turn around in these sums, nor it there are proposals to have more complex diagrams to use up the odd spare half hour.

You also dilute the benefit in terms of journey times to places like Castle Cary if you make too many stops, but then again an hourly frequency to there, Pewsey and Westbury is obviously of benefit.  Certainly Hungerford might have a case, but not so sure about the traffic levels from Kintbury and Thatcham heading west.  Perhaps they could run one to/from Frome every other hour and one to/from Exeter the other hour making those stops Graham suggests?  That would reduce the demand on resources, yet still tick as many boxes as possible.  They would likely be 5-car sets off peak though, so would there be enough seats?

Tiverton Parkway is indeed a bit of a special case, so perhaps stopping the fast trains there is better than the semi-fasts, but of course that adds to the journey times to and from Exeter and further west from London.  Perhaps one fast train could stop at Tiverton but miss out Totnes, and the next do the opposite with the semi-fasts still calling to give an hourly frequency (at irregular timings) at Tiverton.  But then Totnes will suffer from what is largely an hourly service to and from London for much of the day.

Unless new stations such as Devizes Parkway, Collumpton, and Little Bedwyn are very firmly in the pipeline (i.e. under construction or fully funded) then whilst you might have one eye on the future, the service shouldn't be specified around them in my opinion.

Lots to juggle to find the best compromise, and no matter how many you please, there's bound to be someone who ends up with a worse service!   Undecided
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: March 21, 2018, 16:43:01 »

I'm not sure how/whether there are sufficent IETs (Intercity Express Train) to step up to hourly on the semi-fast.....aren't they all allocated (either in service or being serviced)

Oh - it's a pretty good bet that ordering will have been pared down to provide just enough trains to handle the initial requirements and number being serviced at any time.

Looking at London to Exeter - semi-fast every 2 hours is probably 4 trains, rising to 7 trains if you make it every hour. If the London to Exeter semi-fast also takes on the roll of the Bedwyn services, I think that's three trains available to add to the four of the two-hourly service - your same total of 7.   Not sure if long enough is allowed for turn around in these sums, nor it there are proposals to have more complex diagrams to use up the odd spare half hour.

You also dilute the benefit in terms of journey times to places like Castle Cary if you make too many stops, but then again an hourly frequency to there, Pewsey and Westbury is obviously of benefit.  Certainly Hungerford might have a case, but not so sure about the traffic levels from Kintbury and Thatcham heading west.  Perhaps they could run one to/from Frome every other hour and one to/from Exeter the other hour making those stops Graham suggests?  That would reduce the demand on resources, yet still tick as many boxes as possible.  They would likely be 5-car sets off peak though, so would there be enough seats?

Tiverton Parkway is indeed a bit of a special case, so perhaps stopping the fast trains there is better than the semi-fasts, but of course that adds to the journey times to and from Exeter and further west from London.  Perhaps one fast train could stop at Tiverton but miss out Totnes, and the next do the opposite with the semi-fasts still calling to give an hourly frequency (at irregular timings) at Tiverton.  But then Totnes will suffer from what is largely an hourly service to and from London for much of the day.

Unless new stations such as Devizes Parkway, Collumpton, and Little Bedwyn are very firmly in the pipeline (i.e. under construction or fully funded) then whilst you might have one eye on the future, the service shouldn't be specified around them in my opinion.

Lots to juggle to find the best compromise, and no matter how many you please, there's bound to be someone who ends up with a worse service!   Undecided

I agree it's starting to sound like a "stopper" to the South West if this wish list becomes reality - I'm sure Theale, Thatcham, Kintbury, Hungerford, Bedwyn etc all warrant a service however surely these should be provided by 387s allowing the 800s to be "fast", stopping at major stations on their way to the South West, cutting journey times as much as possible and making the train a more attractive option?

Otherwise it's one step forward and two back?
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: March 21, 2018, 16:51:29 »

Don't think you'll find any 387's beyond Newbury TG!

My understanding is that the Reading-Newbury "shuttle" will be 387's, but everything else 800's.

And as for....
Quote
Little Bedwyn
....you are joking II?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #35 on: March 21, 2018, 21:34:22 »

I agree it's starting to sound like a "stopper" to the South West if this wish list becomes reality - I'm sure Theale, Thatcham, Kintbury, Hungerford, Bedwyn etc all warrant a service however surely these should be provided by 387s allowing the 800s to be "fast", stopping at major stations on their way to the South West, cutting journey times as much as possible and making the train a more attractive option?

Otherwise it's one step forward and two back?

Err ... we're looking at the second train in the hour.  The first one is none-stop London - Reading (not even calling at Taplow) the none-stop to Taunton ... current services is about one an hour but all sorts of stopping patterns. 

Having got string up all the way to Newbury (and what cost those of us further west are paying for the disruption this year!), logic is to run 2 x electric trains into Newbury each hour, two passenger trains west of Newbury - the express I mentioned above that does the 3 hours which is make or break for the Plymouth economy, and one serving nearly all intermediate stations.  Its case is made without new stations, by the way (answering another post), but it would be an enabler should one be built.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #36 on: March 22, 2018, 08:25:23 »

I agree it's starting to sound like a "stopper" to the South West if this wish list becomes reality - I'm sure Theale, Thatcham, Kintbury, Hungerford, Bedwyn etc all warrant a service however surely these should be provided by 387s allowing the 800s to be "fast", stopping at major stations on their way to the South West, cutting journey times as much as possible and making the train a more attractive option?

Otherwise it's one step forward and two back?

Err ... we're looking at the second train in the hour.  The first one is none-stop London - Reading (not even calling at Taplow) the none-stop to Taunton ... current services is about one an hour but all sorts of stopping patterns. 

Having got string up all the way to Newbury (and what cost those of us further west are paying for the disruption this year!), logic is to run 2 x electric trains into Newbury each hour, two passenger trains west of Newbury - the express I mentioned above that does the 3 hours which is make or break for the Plymouth economy, and one serving nearly all intermediate stations.  Its case is made without new stations, by the way (answering another post), but it would be an enabler should one be built.

Not sure where the relevance to Taplow sits in the context under discussion? (Although it does have c250,000 passengers a year, versus less than 100,000 for Kintbury!)  Wink

It is a good example of my point however - I wouldn't expect IETs (Intercity Express Train) to stop there - local stations and the railway generally are surely best served by frequent and reliable stopping services to larger stations/interchanges where longer distance services can be picked up?

If your aspiration is to get to a place where "nearly all intermediate stations" are served, then "semi fast" is going to be a very subjective term indeed - exactly how many stations are involved, and what (roughly) are the gaps between them?

Surely IETs are designed for long stretches at high speed, not stopping every few minutes to pick up half a dozen passengers out in the sticks? (.....and I write that as someone who lives out in the sticks!!!)  Smiley



Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #37 on: March 22, 2018, 08:33:57 »

Not sure where the relevance to Taplow sits in the context under discussion? (Although it does have c250,000 passengers a year, versus less than 100,000 for Kintbury!)  Wink

A jocular choice based on your forum name of a station that would clearly not be logical!

Quote
It is a good example of my point however - I wouldn't expect IETs (Intercity Express Train) to stop there - local stations and the railway generally are surely best served by frequent and reliable stopping services to larger stations/interchanges where longer distance services can be picked up?

If your aspiration is to get to a place where "nearly all intermediate stations" are served, then "semi fast" is going to be a very subjective term indeed - exactly how many stations are involved, and what (roughly) are the gaps between them?

Surely IETs are designed for long stretches at high speed, not stopping every few minutes to pick up half a dozen passengers out in the sticks? (.....and I write that as someone who lives out in the sticks!!!)  Smiley

HSTs (High Speed Train) were designed for that (and look at them now!) ...

There are some long stretches out in the "sticks".   Pewsey to Westbury.  Castle Cary to Taunton - but indeed the term is subjective. Add Bruton and you may have "all stations". And you may have a logical service too, with the fast train exchanging passengers both ways with the slow train at Exeter.  If not IETs, then perhaps there's something that could be cascaded with fewer carriages between really fast power cars - can't image what that could be though  Grin
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: March 22, 2018, 09:12:32 »

Not sure where the relevance to Taplow sits in the context under discussion? (Although it does have c250,000 passengers a year, versus less than 100,000 for Kintbury!)  Wink

A jocular choice based on your forum name of a station that would clearly not be logical!

Quote
It is a good example of my point however - I wouldn't expect IETs (Intercity Express Train) to stop there - local stations and the railway generally are surely best served by frequent and reliable stopping services to larger stations/interchanges where longer distance services can be picked up?

If your aspiration is to get to a place where "nearly all intermediate stations" are served, then "semi fast" is going to be a very subjective term indeed - exactly how many stations are involved, and what (roughly) are the gaps between them?

Surely IETs are designed for long stretches at high speed, not stopping every few minutes to pick up half a dozen passengers out in the sticks? (.....and I write that as someone who lives out in the sticks!!!)  Smiley

HSTs (High Speed Train) were designed for that (and look at them now!) ...

There are some long stretches out in the "sticks".   Pewsey to Westbury.  Castle Cary to Taunton - but indeed the term is subjective. Add Bruton and you may have "all stations". And you may have a logical service too, with the fast train exchanging passengers both ways with the slow train at Exeter.  If not IETs, then perhaps there's something that could be cascaded with fewer carriages between really fast power cars - can't image what that could be though  Grin

"HSTs were designed for that (and look at them now!) ..."


..................say no more.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page