Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:15 29 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 10:33:33 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[52] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[51] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[32] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 19
  Print  
Author Topic: Trimode cl 769 to operate Reading to Oxford and Gatwick.  (Read 113624 times)
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #210 on: March 04, 2022, 17:30:22 »


A train's performance on a gradient does not depend on whether it is diesel or electric but on its adhesion and therefore tractive effort. This in turn depends on axle load, number of driven axles and rail conditions, where friction can vary typically between 12% and 30%. A  diesel might be less inclined to slip as it could not lay down as much power as when under electric drive.

There are a number of c1:100 gradients at the Eastern end, the worst is 1:96, not the 1:40's experienced in the Pennines!

OTC

Logged
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #211 on: March 04, 2022, 17:55:23 »

Does it have to be a problem due to lack of adhesion, or could it be that the motors would not have sufficient power to actually turn the wheels against the weight of the train trying to roll back down the slope?
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #212 on: March 04, 2022, 18:03:20 »


By analogy, an 08 shunter with three axles and only 400/260hp can move almost anything, although not very quickly!

OTC
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #213 on: March 04, 2022, 18:35:41 »

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #214 on: March 04, 2022, 19:08:41 »

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…

And the loadings at peak times far exceeded any loading they will encounter on the North Downs.

It would be interesting to know what the failures are? 

Is down the legacy equipment on the train these failures could be in part due to the age of the equipment, this can be helped by heavy overhaul, and new / refurb equipment
Is due to the knowledge / experience of the maintenance staff; then this should improve over time  is it down to the new systems and the fine tuning of these
Is it the new systems, then fine tuning and experience should improve this.

If it is a combination of all 3 then that will take some concerted effort to resolve
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
nickswift99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 145


View Profile
« Reply #215 on: March 04, 2022, 20:17:30 »

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…

But they were using electric traction not diesel.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #216 on: March 04, 2022, 21:01:06 »

A train's performance on a gradient does not depend on whether it is diesel or electric but on its adhesion and therefore tractive effort. This in turn depends on axle load, number of driven axles and rail conditions, where friction can vary typically between 12% and 30%. A  diesel might be less inclined to slip as it could not lay down as much power as when under electric drive.

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…

But they were using electric traction not diesel.

Is the 769 heavier (having extra diesel engines and fuel tanks) so heavier weight on the drive wheels, and thus better traction (though less power) .   Or is the extra weight over unpowered wheels, meaning the same traction on the powered wheels and indeed a reduced performance because it has a heavier base load in the train as a whole?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #217 on: March 04, 2022, 21:23:15 »

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…

But they were using electric traction not diesel.

I thought the 769 still used the electric traction motors when running on diesel. The diesel engines just drive alternators which generate the electricity.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #218 on: March 04, 2022, 21:41:42 »

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…

But they were using electric traction not diesel.

I thought the 769 still used the electric traction motors when running on diesel. The diesel engines just drive alternators which generate the electricity.

But when using diesel power the traction motors can only provide enough power if the alternators can supply that power.  If the diesel engines or the alternators are not powerful enough it doesn't matter how powerful the traction motors are. 
Logged
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #219 on: March 04, 2022, 22:04:16 »

319s coped with a quite significant gradient between City T/L and Blackfriars for years…

But they were using electric traction not diesel.

I thought the 769 still used the electric traction motors when running on diesel. The diesel engines just drive alternators which generate the electricity.

But when using diesel power the traction motors can only provide enough power if the alternators can supply that power.  If the diesel engines or the alternators are not powerful enough it doesn't matter how powerful the traction motors are. 

Agreed and, if there was not enough power to get up an incline, would it come to a halt due to wheelspin (loss of adhesion), or because the motors just couldn't turn the wheels?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #220 on: March 04, 2022, 23:33:39 »

Here's a comment about the 769s that may be relevant:
Quote
“Rebuilding can often be more difficult than building from new. Making the existing and new components work together can be a real challenge.”
Helen Simpson, innovation and development manager, Porterbrook

She's probably now saying to herself "well, that's one thing I got right at least".

That's from an article in May 2019, so when the programme was already running late. Another quote suggests one of the areas of awkward co-operation:
Quote
Wabtec’s biggest engineering challenge was the new electronic control cubicle, which controls local power on the driving cars.

The "bus" isn't an infinite busbar, or anything like. The two alternators and the four motor/converter loads are looking at only each other, and that close coupling offers a lot of scope for instability, surges, etc. And if that damages the motors, they may even fail when not on diesel power. Also, if the alternators can't meet the motors' current demands, that limits the power and torque available.

I know the GTO converters do what the big series resistors do in a tram: allow the starting volts across the motor to be low and then to rise as the train speeds up. That should mean that the starting current from the alternators is quite low, while in the motors it's high. I can't find out whether the controllers still use field switching or weakening for higher speeds.

Neither have I found out anything about the ABB alternators, though this is a key component. Vivarail had a lot of problems with their light-weight modern TSA (Ticketing and Settlement Agreement.) ones (similar to the ones in 800s, I think) in the 230s, and ended up replacing them all with much heavier but more robust old-style ones.

Making the train accelerate depends on the adhesion (at low speed) and power (in the middle and higher speed ranges). Adhesion depends on the fraction of the weight on driven wheels, which for a 319 is 0.36 (4/16 axles motored, but a lot of weight in the MSO (Motor Standard Opens)). Adding the two diesel generators adds 15 t (over 10%) to two trailers, bringing that fraction down to 0.33. That's similar to an HST (High Speed Train), and much lower than most modern units (typically 0.5-0.6).

Here is a more explicit statement from Porterbrook about the available power (specially for OTC):

Simon explains: “The MAN engines have a rail pedigree and are compliant with Stage IIIb emissions rules. Their maximum rating is 390kW, but we decided to have them working at less than that to give ourselves some ‘headroom’. In service, the two engines will deliver around 720kW at the DC (Direct Current) Link (just under 1,000hp), which is somewhat less than the 1.2MW available in electric mode, but in general speeds are expected to be lower when working on diesel, and this arrangement gives good power in the mid-range. Performance should be comparable to a Class 150.”

An unusual usage of "somewhat"?
Logged
nickswift99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 145


View Profile
« Reply #221 on: March 05, 2022, 07:55:32 »

That’s a useful post.

So if I have read that right the Diesel engines have added 10% to the weight while the available power has dropped 20%?

I appreciate there are other factors at play but that does suggest that performance is never going to be anywhere near that of a 319.

Does anyone know if a 150 has ever done the North Downs route?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #222 on: March 05, 2022, 09:31:24 »

That’s a useful post.

So if I have read that right the Diesel engines have added 10% to the weight while the available power has dropped 20%?

No you fell into the trap as I did initially comparing 1000hp to 1.2MW

"In service, the two engines will deliver around 720kW at the DC (Direct Current) Link (just under 1,000hp), which is somewhat less than the 1.2MW available in electric mode"

1.2MW to 720kW is a 40% drop in power!

Hence stuving's comment about an unusual usage of "somewhat".
Logged
Fourbee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 672


View Profile
« Reply #223 on: March 05, 2022, 09:41:43 »

Does anyone know if a 150 has ever done the North Downs route?

Not sure, but when pairs of ex-Southern 456s were used on the Guildford-Ascot runs they really struggled to get out of Guildford and that was on lightly loaded trains, without extra engines and equipment added. Wikipedia quotes the power output as 373kW (so about 750kW as a pair of 2-cars).
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #224 on: March 05, 2022, 11:27:14 »


Again, by analogy, the  unlamented "Tadpole"units that once inhabited this route weighed in at 113t with a 500hp diesel and only one motor bogie.

Slipping was a minor feature of the Southern's EE507, big traction motor, single motor car policy - part of the reason the 508's were banished to Merseyside.

The other problem is the perennial Diesel electric problem, that the generator/alternator produces more power at "right away" than the TM(resolve)'s can use, leading to excessive windings' temperature rise. I think the 47's had a minimum continuous speed of 27mph to avoid TM damage, which limited their freight use.

What it does mean is that the makers need time to get even an adaptation right before launching anything new into service and making the public or at least the TOC (Train Operating Company)'s driver managers put up with an unfinished job.

OTC
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 19
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page