Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- What contributed to the Baltimore Bridge collapse?
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:48 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09:35 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 08:52:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19
  Print  
Author Topic: Trimode cl 769 to operate Reading to Oxford and Gatwick.  (Read 113550 times)
brooklea
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 313


View Profile
« Reply #255 on: December 16, 2022, 21:51:15 »


Definitely unpopular - not just with the travelling public, but also with SWR» (South Western Railway - about)!

Not that that would matter, were DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to issue SWR with an instruction that that was what they were to do.

Twelve months ago the withdrawal of the through service between Bristol and Waterloo was unpopular, but it still happened, in the interests of saving money….
Logged
brooklea
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 313


View Profile
« Reply #256 on: December 16, 2022, 22:03:34 »

I would be amazed to see GWR (Great Western Railway) be allowed (by DfT» (Department for Transport - about)) to bring back 153s.

But then would they need to go back direct to GWR?

Attach the 153s to other compliant 153s and 150s in the TfW fleet where they already have spares and the total trains would have accessible loos, and cascade some 150s and 158s from TfW to GWR to enhance their fleet.

No, that’s a fair point.

I haven’t experienced one of TfWs ‘PRM (Persons with Reduced Mobility)-lite’ 153s to know what level of modification they’ve received to allow them to continue in service, though I understand there’s a bit more to it than locking the toilet door.

No doubt for the right level of compensation TfW could release some 150s or 158s in return for 153s, but as the goal is to cut costs, I expect GWR will just have to do less with less (or rather fewer) trains. Would love to be proved wrong.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #257 on: December 17, 2022, 07:34:31 »

So this is just cost-cutting, not because they were not up to the job?

As stated elsewhere, this does nothing to address the problems with a shortage of carriages further west. We now have the [ridiculous?] situation where on Thames Valley routes we have 8 car trains (2x Electrostars) running most of the day with perhaps 20% of the seats filled on services that used to be 2- or 3- car Turbo operated, and overcrowded trains on other routes further west because Turbos cannot be cascaded from non-electrified services (or not fully electrified ones). If we had electrified most of the network, or even achieved the electrification of the Thames Valley branches and filled the gaps on the North Downs the existing fleet of Electrostars would presumably filled the slots adequately.

Presumably the cost-cutting imperative means that the sensible step of bringing back the 153s suggested by Grahame will not be followed up to save the leasing cost?

Cost cutting by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) I would say is the main force behind this

North Downs electrification whist an answer, it is a long term one though then the 319 could have worked that.  The Electrification AC/DC (Direct Current) interface at Reading has no easy solution to it, all of the proposals I've heard of from colleges are expensive, there does need to be a traction power systems isolation between DC and AC systems, even just to allow the units into and out of Reading Train Care.   These interfaces are complex, I deal with 3 of them in my day job.

The electrification Didcot to Oxford again not an overnight fix would release some 165/66

I fear the reality will be service cuts, reduced frequencies, train lengths etc.  The DfT will be placing a lot of rigor on ToC's to justify their operating costs
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #258 on: December 17, 2022, 09:19:45 »

If Reading – Gatwick becomes third rail throughout then it's pretty obvious to transfer the route to South Western and to resource it from a bigger fleet maintained at Wimbledon or wherever. 

Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #259 on: December 17, 2022, 09:33:06 »

If Reading – Gatwick becomes third rail throughout then it's pretty obvious to transfer the route to South Western and to resource it from a bigger fleet maintained at Wimbledon or wherever. 



Or Southern the fleet would then run out of Brighton
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #260 on: December 17, 2022, 11:24:18 »

From my point of view as a passenger, SWR» (South Western Railway - about) any day rather than Southern. Not that that will concern DfT» (Department for Transport - about) one jot.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #261 on: December 17, 2022, 13:26:19 »

I suppose signs like this (on Reading platform 7) will hang around as the ghost of the never to be 769 for years to come.

Both the 769 and the short HST (High Speed Train) were functions of the parsimonious DfT» (Department for Transport - about), which looked at the capital cost but not the value, at a time when interest rates were low.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #262 on: December 17, 2022, 15:26:38 »

If Reading – Gatwick becomes third rail throughout then it's pretty obvious to transfer the route to South Western and to resource it from a bigger fleet maintained at Wimbledon or wherever. 

Redundancy for those GWR (Great Western Railway) staff at Reading unable, or unwilling, to transfer? Where would the sets for early morning Reading starters be stabled? The third rail platforms are already fully utilised for overnight stabling of Waterloo services.

The service pattern at present requires the fleet and staff to be at the Reading end of the North Downs Line. Just one unit is outstationed overnight at Redhill.

Changing the fleet and depot would require a huge timetable re-write. To say nothing of the less than zero chance of 3rd rail infill being authorised.

To my mind, the only logical answer is for DfT» (Department for Transport - about)/GWR to order some new trains. Logical, but unlikely. Suitable for the existing infrastructure. Either diesel all the way, as at present, or DC (Direct Current) third rail electro-diesel. While they're at it, order similar diesel only and AC electro-diesels for the West. The commonality across the fleet would do wonders for staffing and maintenance costs. I look to what Greater Anglia have achieved with their Stadler fleet commonality.

Am I a dreamer?
« Last Edit: December 17, 2022, 15:36:23 by JayMac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #263 on: December 17, 2022, 15:45:39 »

I think with the GWR (Great Western Railway) thoughts on electrification sequence in the August Modern Railways (p61), there should be a single design of multiple unit, as there was for the Electrostars, which is then modified to the specific needs of its allocated line(s). For GWR this would probably be AC/diesel hybrid or AC/BEMU. For SWR» (South Western Railway - about) a AC/DC (Direct Current) diesel hybrid or AC/DC/BEMU,which could also be used for the North Down line.

Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #264 on: December 17, 2022, 17:27:34 »

I might be mistaken, but aren't the Electrostars GWR (Great Western Railway) already bi-modal? I think they have those pick-up bars on their bogies that look like they are ready for 3rd rail use.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #265 on: December 17, 2022, 17:47:39 »

I might be mistaken, but aren't the Electrostars GWR (Great Western Railway) already bi-modal? I think they have those pick-up bars on their bogies that look like they are ready for 3rd rail use.
They are definitely “dual voltage”, and IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) were tested on DC (Direct Current) during acceptance.

But then again that capability wasn’t usually described as “bi-mode” until very recently.   

Paul
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #266 on: December 17, 2022, 17:58:06 »

I might be mistaken, but aren't the Electrostars GWR (Great Western Railway) already bi-modal? I think they have those pick-up bars on their bogies that look like they are ready for 3rd rail use.

387 "Electrostars" are dual Voltage not bi-mode.  Bi-mode is 2 different energy forms.

I cannot see electrification of the North Downs line happening in the next 2 or 3 Control Periods (10 to 15 years), it could be argued that the 769 offered the best chance of third rail in-fill schemes.

There is still the problem of the AC/DC (Direct Current) traction power interface at Reading, there is no simple or cheap way to do it and it has to be done due to some simple principles that 25kV AC is and Earthed Traction Return ie the Neutral at the supply transformer is bonded to Earth, where as the Third Rail DC Traction Return ie the negative is not directly bonded to Earth; this is to reduce stray DC return currents using alternative Earth paths back to the rectifier and causing Cathodic erosion of metal in that Earth path (Utilities, building and structure foundations etc even ones outside the railway will get effected)
The AC / DC interface is basically a Galvanic isolator between the 2 systems, they require a piece of line in each direction of travel (or 4 for 4 track railway) 1 carriage longer than the longest train (irrespective of them being electric, diesel, steam or clockwork) they involve a lot of electrical equipment .................... not cheap or simple  
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #267 on: December 17, 2022, 23:54:51 »

Imagine what could've been done across the network if £100bn wasn't being spaffed on the vanity project carving its way through the Chilterns.

Yeah, I know. Capex v opex. National infrastructure v local. Shiny superfast inter city trains v needed run of the mill local/regional stock. Buying votes v doing the right thing...
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #268 on: December 18, 2022, 22:52:48 »

Imagine what could've been done across the network if £100bn wasn't being spaffed on the vanity project carving its way through the Chilterns.

Yeah, I know. Capex v opex. National infrastructure v local. Shiny superfast inter city trains v needed run of the mill local/regional stock. Buying votes v doing the right thing...

They could have borrowed £100 billion at cheap government rates to upgrade the existing services? Doubt it somehow. That start-up money was borrowed and spent nearly 200 years ago. Pretty much everything on the existing network is supposed to be running costs and planned replacement of stock and infrastructure within a certain timescale. We don't do it that way here, preferring the last-minute refurb of time-expired stock and a few running repairs on the PW (Permanent Way).
Logged

Now, please!
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #269 on: December 20, 2022, 12:42:12 »

Imagine what could've been done across the network if £100bn wasn't being spaffed on the vanity project carving its way through the Chilterns.

Yeah, I know. Capex v opex. National infrastructure v local. Shiny superfast inter city trains v needed run of the mill local/regional stock. Buying votes v doing the right thing...

I would not say HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) is a vanity project the WCML (West Coast Main Line) 1955 modernisation plan (which did not finish until 1974) cost £345 million, that's about £11 Billion today; in the 1990's  a further £14 billon (that's £37 Billion today) the 1990's upgrade was not completed because of the difficulties of completing the Southern end in to London and rising costs

So over nearly half a centaury close on c £47 Billion was spent on the WCML with only marginal increase in speed and capacity.  HS2 will give the extra capacity on the WCML especially for freight

Its likely the signalling system North of Crewe will be ETCS (European Train Control System) ie in cab signalling to take advantage of HS2 for faster journeys to Scotland.

The bit the UK (United Kingdom) Governments have never been any good at is real stratgigic transport planning all MP (Member of Parliament)'s can only see as far as 5 years
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page