Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
 today - PEW, Wolmar, to edge of world
15/11/2018 - WWRUG - Westbury
16/11/2018 - TWSW AGM
17/11/2018 - GWRA Auction, Pershore
21/11/2018 - First Bath Bus panel
21/11/2018 - Consultation end - Angel Road
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
November 13, 2018, 07:50:22 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[94] Four track for Filton Bank - ongoing discussion
[62] MetroBus
[56] IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent pe...
[44] 43185 in 1988 Swallow livery
[36] How much will it cost? Expanding the network.
[34] Cotswold Line - 2018 cancellation and amendments log
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: Not just GWR...  (Read 3576 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3489


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: July 08, 2018, 11:46:17 pm »

We are often told by the railway industry that these major closures are planned far in advance and cant therefore be altered, presuming that this is true, why was almost no warning given by GTR of this closure.

There are going to be exceptional closures for emergency works at short notice.  It feels at times though that short notice closures or effective closures (no trains running) have become anything but exceptional.

Depends where the engineering works are. If they are following up the temporary repairs put in place at Streatham (I think it was) that stopped trains to Victoria, then it was not planned months in advance. 

The main line closure is Three Bridges to Brighton, hence a long bus journey, and I think it was listed on Southern's web site in May (when the problems with the Gatwick-Redhill buses were news). The March EAS lists it as Commissioning, Resignalling, and Maintenance. So no, it's not new - is there any evidence it wasn't easy to find out about if you actually needed to know?

What does seem to be missing from the advance information is a real alternative to the Journey planner. That's a good start if only one train interests you, and what they list for works by date then fills in the "how bad would it be" details. But for works that spread over many days/weekends, that doesn't help you with "I'd like to go to Brighton at least one weekend this summer - which day would be best?"

And how would you actually use this information, in practice, other than (as they do suggest too) not travelling at all?
Quote
Travelling to Brighton to / from stations between Three Bridges and London?

    A limited train service will operate in both directions between Brighton and London Victoria via Littlehampton with journey times extended by 60 minutes, taking 2 hours 15 minutes between London and Brighton.
    Customers travelling between London and Brighton are advised to use these services rather than the replacement buses.
    These trains will only operate once an hour and space will be extremely limited. Not everyone will be able to board these services.

As it happens there is another long-planned possession at Streatham Common, but it's only on the line (Streatham Spurs) from Tulse Hill, so not likely to be useful.
Logged
old original
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 622


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: August 04, 2018, 11:51:12 am »

Old Severn bridge closed due to staff sickness....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-45069260
Logged

7 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22445



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #62 on: August 04, 2018, 12:03:22 pm »

Old Severn bridge closed due to staff sickness....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-45069260


A financial decision hidden in a cloak of safety, perhaps?

Quote
"If we haven't got staff members in crucial roles on the toll plaza it is not safe for our team or the drivers so we have taken the decision to close the tolls.

and

Quote
It remains open in the eastbound direction, which is not controlled by tolls.

If the toll booths had simply been left open, news would have spread and those in the know would have taken to using the old bridge not the new, reducing the fare take on the new bridge.  Couldn't risk that, could we?  Better send the drivers who would normally use the old bridge via the new, so their money can be collected anyway!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4841


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: August 04, 2018, 06:33:46 pm »

Old Severn bridge closed due to staff sickness....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-45069260

A somewhat opportunistic smug tweet earlier from GWR:
The M48 Severn Crossing is closed but GWR services from Bristol Parkway to Wales are running a good service.

Okay, letís see how you do tomorrow on services between South Wales and London and how many are cancelled due to shortage of crew.

I doubt those who were due to travel on the Pembroke Coast Express from Pembrokeshire to London this morning would describe it as Ďa good serviceí.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2222



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: August 04, 2018, 07:41:51 pm »

Those whom live in glass houses - -

The reliability of GWR services is far behind that of the bridge crossing.
Weekends=staff shortages
Weekdays=short trains
 
Moderately bad weather, during which roads and airlines work normally, throws the railway into chaos.
Logged

"When customers say that they want a seat, they dont mean they want to sit with their knees behind their ears so that 4 more can sit down. They mean that they want an extra coach so that 74 more can sit down"
"Capacity on intercity routes should be about number of vehicles, not compressing people"
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants