Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
 today - Friends of Bridgwater Station
today - TW NorthWest / Liverpool
22/10/2018 - ACoRP board nominations close
29/10/2018 - Avocet line AGM
30/10/2018 - Minehaed Rail Link Group
31/10/2018 - CCIF Applications close
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
October 18, 2018, 12:19:19 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[96] Andrew Haines speaking yesterday (16/10)
[85] Isambird Kingdom Brunowl
[56] BBC Radio Devon 17/10
[53] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Getting Electrification Right
[9] Devon Metro
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Consultation: Western Rail Link to Heathrow (11/5/2018 - 22/6/2018)  (Read 970 times)
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 943


View Profile
« on: May 11, 2018, 04:49:01 pm »

Public consultation on the route opened today.



"Consultation hub" here.

Quote
The proposed rail link would:
Deliver a new, faster, frequent, more reliable direct train service to Heathrow with four trains per hour in each direction. All trains would call at Reading and Slough and alternate trains at Twyford and Maidenhead. Journey times could be as short as 26 minutes from Reading and 6 to7 minutes from Slough.
Significantly improve rail connectivity to Heathrow from the Thames Valley, South Coast, South West, South Wales and West Midlands
Provide an alternative form of transport for passengers and the airport workforce currently travelling by road
Ease congestion on roads, including the M4, M3 and M25 resulting in lower CO2 emissions equivalent to approximately 30 million road miles per year
Generate economic growth and new jobs across the Thames Valley and surrounding areas
Reduce passenger congestion at London Paddington
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2987


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2018, 05:02:33 pm »

Not having the Heathrow Express Depot at the former Langley Oil Terminal Site takes away one problem with this.  Could that have been part of the thinking in  integrating the Heathrow Express fleet with GWR?

Logged
paul7755
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2018, 05:49:49 pm »

Could that have been part of the thinking in  integrating the Heathrow Express fleet with GWR?
I think it can definitely be assumed it was, especially given how the cancellation of the Hex depot was mentioned in the original announcement about the transfer to 387 operation.

It was in the second paragraph of the bit Ollie posted here back in March:  http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19559.msg234616#msg234616

Paul
Logged
Red Squirrel
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2137


The first town plan. An idea that had legs.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2018, 06:15:25 pm »

Intrigued to know what an 'intersection bridge' is. Would it be the thing that in the olden days we used to refer to as a 'bridge'?
Logged

Sir. Does this mean that Ann-Margret's not coming?
Electric train
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2988


The future is 25,000 Volts a.c.


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2018, 06:35:26 pm »

Intrigued to know what an 'intersection bridge' is. Would it be the thing that in the olden days we used to refer to as a 'bridge'?

Probably the same style as Stockley Park
Logged

Mark Carne 26 June 2015 - "The challenges of delivering myriad improvement projects while still running a railway seven days a week were simply overwhelming".
SandTEngineer
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2334


In a Linemans Hut in the far Southwest


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2018, 07:06:19 pm »

What in them 'olden days' we used to call a flyover..... Tongue
Logged

Out of this nettle, Danger, we pluck this flower, Safety.
[Henry IV, Part 1, Act 2, Scene 3]
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3389


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2018, 07:14:32 pm »

What in them 'olden days' we used to call a flyover..... Tongue

I think the term is older than flyover ... it is in the title, presumably the original one, of "View of the Intersection Bridge on the line of the St Helens & Runcorn Gap Railway, crossing the Liverpool and Manchester Railway near the foot of the Sutton inclined plane" dated 1832.

So, not necessarily at a railway junction, but also not a road bridge (over- or under-). It would be confusing to say railway bridge except as over- or under- when seen from one line alone.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 07:39:14 pm by stuving » Logged
Red Squirrel
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2137


The first town plan. An idea that had legs.


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2018, 08:24:52 pm »

I am in awe, stuving, I really am! Smiley
Logged

Sir. Does this mean that Ann-Margret's not coming?
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2987


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 11, 2018, 08:39:27 pm »

Intrigued to know what an 'intersection bridge' is. Would it be the thing that in the olden days we used to refer to as a 'bridge'?

Probably the same style as Stockley Park

What in them 'olden days' we used to call a flyover..... Tongue

Looking at the plan, given the proximity to the tunnel entrance, fact that the main line is on an embankment at this point and the proposed closure of Hollow Hill Lane, I would suggest it would be a dive under rather than a flyover!
Logged
SandTEngineer
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2334


In a Linemans Hut in the far Southwest


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2018, 09:15:03 pm »

Ahem.  Having now looked at the linked consultation document..... Roll Eyes

Quote
Detailed plans

We are proposing to build a new railway link that would leave the Great Western Main Line between Langley and Iver. It would then descend underneath the main railway line into a cutting before entering a 5km tunnel.
Logged

Out of this nettle, Danger, we pluck this flower, Safety.
[Henry IV, Part 1, Act 2, Scene 3]
Electric train
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2988


The future is 25,000 Volts a.c.


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2018, 07:32:56 am »

Ahem.  Having now looked at the linked consultation document..... Roll Eyes

Quote
Detailed plans

We are proposing to build a new railway link that would leave the Great Western Main Line between Langley and Iver. It would then descend underneath the main railway line into a cutting before entering a 5km tunnel.

Ah an inverted Stockley Park then  Grin  Southeast of London Bridge its called its BDU (Bermondsey Dive Under) or at East Ealing ADU (Acton Dive Under)  (note East Ealing is the posh name for West Acton  Grin )
Logged

Mark Carne 26 June 2015 - "The challenges of delivering myriad improvement projects while still running a railway seven days a week were simply overwhelming".
paul7755
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2018, 03:46:10 pm »


Ah an inverted Stockley Park then  Grin  Southeast of London Bridge its called its BDU (Bermondsey Dive Under) or at East Ealing ADU (Acton Dive Under)  (note East Ealing is the posh name for West Acton  Grin )


To my eye the Bermondsey construction is a 'bit of both'.  It's certainly more dive under than flyover, but the Thameslink lines do rise above the local level (the Cannon St lines) as well.   Possibly about 30% flyover (for the Thameslnk route - Sussex fasts) and 70% dive under (for the Southeastern route - Kent fasts), IYSWIM...

I wonder if there is anywhere on the network where there is an even 50/50 grade separation between two routes?

Paul

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22105



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2018, 09:26:36 am »

"Ping"ing topic ... consultation closes on Friday ... https://www.networkrail.co.uk/our-railway-upgrade-plan/key-projects/heathrow-rail-link/
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants