Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:55 28 Mar 2024
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
* Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 18:13:43 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Bossing The Crossing  (Read 2154 times)
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229


View Profile
« on: June 18, 2018, 00:25:22 »

Network rail are running a pedestrian safety campaign at level crossings at https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/safety-in-the-community/safety-campaigns/

As part of the campaign they've released a video showing impatient / idiot pedestrians at Poole High Street level crossing.



Quote

Deliberate misuse of level crossings can kill. Eighty six incidents were recorded in Dorset last year - 36% on Poole High Street level crossing.

The number of pedestrian level crossing incidents is at an all time high and it is our duty to reduce these numbers and preserve the safety of workers, the public, passengers and lineside neighbours.

Find out more here - networkrail.co.uk/pedestrians

« Last Edit: June 18, 2018, 00:41:17 by Surrey 455 » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2018, 05:08:39 »

Network rail are running a pedestrian safety campaign at level crossings at https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/safety-in-the-community/safety-campaigns/

As part of the campaign they've released a video showing impatient / idiot pedestrians at Poole High Street level crossing.
Quote

Deliberate misuse of level crossings can kill. Eighty six incidents were recorded in Dorset last year - 36% on Poole High Street level crossing.

The number of pedestrian level crossing incidents is at an all time high and it is our duty to reduce these numbers and preserve the safety of workers, the public, passengers and lineside neighbours.

Find out more here - networkrail.co.uk/pedestrians


Some very silly things at Poole there - and of course it is 110% right for Network Rail to highlight the problems at that crossing with a view to getting people to behave more safely. A number of things strike me though:

a) The majority of the videos bolted together show cyclists rather than people on foot being the biggest idiots / most dangerous in their actions even though a very very small proportion of the users shown in general are cyclists

b) One video appears to show that there's a problem with pedestrian numbers being so high that they can't all get off the crossing in time - not enough space for them on the roadway / walkway outside the barriers, with (perhaps) them being held on the crossing by a significant numb of people who have correct stopped to wait as the lights have flashed and the sirens sounded

c) May I suggest that Poole High Street crossing is one of a handful across the whole of the UK (United Kingdom) which has pedestrian numbers that are as high as this and it changes the metrics of the whole thing.   It is of dubious scientific correctness to highlight problems here and draw conclusions for almost any other crossing (Lincoln and Paignton maybe?) though it does make a good promotion and marketing point to be careful on ANY crossing.

d) Don't I recall that the arrangement here was changed only a few years back, with Network Rail reducing the operational staff at the crossing to zero in the process.  If the resulting system that they have come up with has its problems, they really need to look at their own system and ask "have we got it right?" alongside ensuring that cyclists and pedestrians are as educated as possible

e) Educating people as a marketing operation well ahead of time can only be part of the answer.  Is there is a need for flagging things up "even better" at the crossing too.  I would imagine that our cyclists in the videos are all going to have been locals and regular users, but I would also imagine that this crossing has a far higher proportion of very occasional users and indeed tourists for whom it has to be naturally safe at first encounter.  Perhaps Network Rail actually have it right for such people, or perhaps the small video selection just didn't happen to include any obvious tourist types.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2018, 07:05:51 »

A BTP (British Transport Police) blitz issuing fixed penalties would be a good place to start.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2018, 07:22:46 »

There’s no excuse at Poole as there is a footbridge right next to the crossing if you can’t wait.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2018, 07:45:50 »

Doesn't provide an alternative for those on bikes*, with pushchairs, or for the infirm/disabled. Like the regular pedestrians all those are just as able to ignore the Highway Code.


What is also interesting about the footbridge is, once the red lights are showing everyone who chooses to use it is technically breaking the law. Can anyone guess why?



* They could carry their bikes over the footbridge, but won't be thanked by pedestrians users of said bridge.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2018, 07:52:47 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2018, 08:22:24 »

Grahame wrote above:
Quote
May I suggest that Poole High Street crossing is one of a handful across the whole of the UK (United Kingdom) which has pedestrian numbers that are as high as this and it changes the metrics of the whole thing.   It is of dubious scientific correctness to highlight problems here and draw conclusions for almost any other crossing (Lincoln and Paignton maybe?) though it does make a good promotion and marketing point to be careful on ANY crossing.

Having had some involvement in the past with this level crossing, I can reassure you that it has the highest pedestrian count of any LC (Level Crossing) in the UK.  When the line was resignalled a couple of years ago we looked at closing the crossing and replacing it with a ramped footbridge.  Ruled out on cost and the adjacent shop owners objecting to loosing out on customers passing their shops.....

The other thing I raised at the time was that the crossing users are 99% pedestrian, so are conventional flashing road lights the correct solution for pedestrians who probably don't have a clue what they mean and generally can't see them close up anyway?

I could go on..... Roll Eyes

Personally, I think its a big education issue, but how do you teach people that may only come across the crossing closing sequence perhaps once a year, if that?

We had a previous discussion on all of this here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=16533.msg187949#msg187949
« Last Edit: June 18, 2018, 08:34:41 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 783


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2018, 08:37:46 »

Surely if the Red Cow Level Crossing immediately north of EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains) justifies an essentially full-time attendant then Poole High Street most certainly does.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2018, 09:34:03 »

so are conventional flashing road lights the correct solution for pedestrians who probably don't have a clue what they mean and generally can't see them close up anyway?

The road lights are supplemented by flashing 'red man' lights at a more pedestrian friendly height. Not forgetting the audible warning. Six flashing red lights each side and a klaxxon should be enough.

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2018, 11:06:03 »

I've been thinking about why most of the risk takers in that video are on bikes and I reckon there are two reasons: people on bikes move faster than people on foot so they probably reckon they can get across in less than the time allowed; and although it's difficult to tell from that video, probably most of them are young, and young people generally (especially young men and it did look as if most of them were male) tend to be most risk-happy than old people.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2018, 11:11:34 »

I see they've also got an ad aimed specifically at cyclists – with some cringe-making acting!
<iframe allowtransparency="true" title="Wistia video player" allowFullscreen frameborder="0" scrolling="no" class="wistia_embed" name="wistia_embed" src="https://fast.wistia.net/embed/iframe/cthbmy6p7g" width="400" height="225"></iframe>
(Not sure if that link will work but it's the second of "Our campaign adverts" on the webpage: https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/safety-in-the-community/safety-campaigns/)

But who's going to see these adverts? Where are they being shown? Are they on TV etc? It's not really much use if they're only on the Network Rail website.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2018, 12:10:18 »

I see they've also got an ad aimed specifically at cyclists – with some cringe-making acting!

This ad is pi radians wide of the mark - it's not about cyclists per say, but about anyone who would move a piece of machinery into the middle of a level crossing to do a bit of light maintenance in the full knowledge that a train was audibly imminent.

As to the suggestion that crossing 'abusers' are 'idiots' or 'impatient' - well, that's a view, but perhaps not a very helpful one. As a rule, if large numbers of people regularly abuse a system, you have to ask whether it is the people at fault or the system.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2018, 17:09:32 »

Remember this from the original topic:

Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2018, 17:11:26 »

As to the suggestion that crossing 'abusers' are 'idiots' or 'impatient' - well, that's a view, but perhaps not a very helpful one. As a rule, if large numbers of people regularly abuse a system, you have to ask whether it is the people at fault or the system.

Well said. One of the first rules in railway incident investigation is "NEVER ASSUME ANYTHING".
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2018, 09:13:51 »

I see they've also got an ad aimed specifically at cyclists – with some cringe-making acting!

This ad is pi radians wide of the mark - it's not about cyclists per say, but about anyone who would move a piece of machinery into the middle of a level crossing to do a bit of light maintenance in the full knowledge that a train was audibly imminent.
Is there any evidence that people are doing this? It must happen occasionally that a cyclist's chain comes off or they get a puncture, or (more commonly – or rather, less infrequently – given overall numbers) a car or lorry breaks down on a level crossing. But I can't think of any level crossing incidents recently that haven't involved someone either deliberately bypassing the barriers or not understanding how they work (as in a farm crossing a year or two ago, in Kent I think, which had some confusing red and green light system that did not actually refer to being allowed to cross – there's a thread on here somewhere).
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 19, 2018, 10:00:21 »

I see they've also got an ad aimed specifically at cyclists – with some cringe-making acting!

This ad is pi radians wide of the mark - it's not about cyclists per say, but about anyone who would move a piece of machinery into the middle of a level crossing to do a bit of light maintenance in the full knowledge that a train was audibly imminent.
Is there any evidence that people are doing this? It must happen occasionally that a cyclist's chain comes off or they get a puncture, or (more commonly – or rather, less infrequently – given overall numbers) a car or lorry breaks down on a level crossing. But I can't think of any level crossing incidents recently that haven't involved someone either deliberately bypassing the barriers or not understanding how they work (as in a farm crossing a year or two ago, in Kent I think, which had some confusing red and green light system that did not actually refer to being allowed to cross – there's a thread on here somewhere).

There's something wrong with the return spring on the rear derailleur of my mountain bike at the moment, but as there are no level crossings near where I live I shall just have to repair it in the shed. Tsk.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page