Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:20 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:38:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: FirstBust ?  (Read 3546 times)
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« on: June 21, 2018, 16:48:37 »

Leading article in July Buses magazine suggesting that FirstGroup could be the first major player to be dismembered and sold off to different interests in different continents. It highlights the failure of Greyhound and TPE (Trans Pennine Express),  the poor set of results for 2017/8, and the departure of Tim O'Toole, but points out that Firstbus is beginning to turn things around in Leeds and Bristol. I suspect that a lot will hinge on the success or otherwise of the M2 and M3 metrobus routes. If it's the former, it may be a stay of execution, but the latter could lead to the break up of the FirstGroup empire.
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2018, 22:55:31 »

I suspect that a lot will hinge on the success or otherwise of the M2 and M3 metrobus routes. If it's the former, it may be a stay of execution, but the latter could lead to the break up of the FirstGroup empire.

Can the whole of a huge, international group like First really be dependent on two bus contracts in comparatively small city?  I think there must be an accumulation of issues across a range of their subsidiaries for a complete disintegration. Bristol may think it's the centre of the universe, but ...
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2018, 23:19:49 »

The overseas stuff is really dragging the company down, so I think that will get sold off if anything.  That being said TPE (Trans Pennine Express) and SWR» (South Western Railway - about) aren't looking especially good either, mainly due to their commitments in future franchise years.  Might it be enough to stop First bidding for the new franchise for 'GWR (Great Western Railway)', as commitments are likely to be quite restrictive compared with the current arrangements?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2018, 00:34:39 »

First don't need to bid for the Greater Western franchise. The government keep giving it to them!

Possibly another four before there's a franchise competition. So that's either four more years with First at the helm, or the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) taking over if FirstGroup fails.

They're skimming along at the bottom financially at the moment. If their banks start making noises...
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2018, 01:23:11 »

I suspect that a lot will hinge on the success or otherwise of the M2 and M3 metrobus routes. If it's the former, it may be a stay of execution, but the latter could lead to the break up of the FirstGroup empire.

Can the whole of a huge, international group like First really be dependent on two bus contracts in comparatively small city?  I think there must be an accumulation of issues across a range of their subsidiaries for a complete disintegration. Bristol may think it's the centre of the universe, but ...
[/quote 

The beat of a butterflies' wings in Brazil.......or Bristol.....
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2018, 05:19:19 »

First don't need to bid for the Greater Western franchise. The government keep giving it to them!

Hmmm ... First have to make an offer that's sufficiently in line with what the government wants to have the business of running the trains awarded to them.   If they fail to make an offer that's good enough for the government, the government can take over and run the trains themselves.  That looks very much like a bidding process to me although one in which the competition is limited to the incumbent and the government.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2018, 08:16:49 »

First don't need to bid for the Greater Western franchise. The government keep giving it to them!

Hmmm ... First have to make an offer that's sufficiently in line with what the government wants to have the business of running the trains awarded to them.   If they fail to make an offer that's good enough for the government, the government can take over and run the trains themselves.  That looks very much like a bidding process to me although one in which the competition is limited to the incumbent and the government.

Of course First cannot afford to bid to loose money so there is a point beyond which they cannot go.

There are of course complicating factors.  With First already losing money on TPE (Trans Pennine Express), government may not wish to push First so far that they have to take TPE in house as well as GW (Great Western).



Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2018, 08:49:24 »

Difficult to know who’s got who over a barrel when it comes to the next direct award for GWR (Great Western Railway) - First over Dft or Dft over First. Both in a mess.
Logged
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2018, 09:21:07 »

Why do franchises have to make money?

Surely First could run the franchise for the government for a fixed fee. This arrangement is already in use elsewhere.

It would be good if the government could create a 'government franchise of GWR (Great Western Railway) and the infrastructure, and take Network Rail out of the equation. A fully integrated franchise would hopefully be a lot more efficient.

Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2018, 09:23:46 »

Bristol may think it's the centre of the universe, but ...

Sotto voce to other Bristolians: The press release is still under embargo; the community at large will be notified of their true status in the fullness of time...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
WelshBluebird
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 158


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2018, 10:32:05 »

It would be good if the government could create a 'government franchise of GWR (Great Western Railway) and the infrastructure, and take Network Rail out of the equation. A fully integrated franchise would hopefully be a lot more efficient.

Right and how would that work where operators share infrastructure?
Would you give the line between Temple Meads and Parkway to GWR or XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise))?
Would you give the line between Cardiff Central and Newport to GWR or ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) or XC?
Etc etc.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2018, 11:26:54 »

It would be good if the government could create a 'government franchise of GWR (Great Western Railway) and the infrastructure, and take Network Rail out of the equation. A fully integrated franchise would hopefully be a lot more efficient.

Right and how would that work where operators share infrastructure?
Would you give the line between Temple Meads and Parkway to GWR or XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise))?
Would you give the line between Cardiff Central and Newport to GWR or ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) or XC?
Etc etc.

The freight companies have consistently opposed such moves as they fear they would be pushed out altogether. 
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2018, 13:08:17 »

First don't need to bid for the Greater Western franchise. The government keep giving it to them!

Hmmm ... First have to make an offer that's sufficiently in line with what the government wants to have the business of running the trains awarded to them.   If they fail to make an offer that's good enough for the government, the government can take over and run the trains themselves.  That looks very much like a bidding process to me although one in which the competition is limited to the incumbent and the government.

In theory I agree that it is a bidding process between First group and HMG, but in practice I suspect that First group would be virtually certain to win, unless their bid was VERY unfavourable to the public purse.
In practice I suspect that HMG are reluctant to take over rail franchises unless unavoidable as was recently the case at East Coast. For the government to have to take over ANOTHER rail franchise would be seen as a failure of the franchising process, and therefore to be avoided if at all possible.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 22, 2018, 16:10:22 »

Also if the government decided to take it over they would have to be confident they could fix the problems quickly.  However, the time to fix the present problems was several years ago and solving them now will take time.  So like Thameslink and Southern they leave it with the franchise to take the blame rather than DfT» (Department for Transport - about) taking it over an becoming responsible for the mess for the couple of years* it will take to fix it.

*A wild guess

Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 22, 2018, 16:47:32 »

A couple of years may be a wild guess, or may prove to be accurate - who can say? But there's a difference between a franchise suffering problems, which can be sorted out by artifice if necessary, and a major transport group running into deep doo-doo. If true, First would have to dump all loss-making operations toot-sweet, and start again. Otherwise, they could fall prey to venture capital funds, who would hold the fire sale for them, get as much out of the company as possible, then sell what is left, if any. They follow the money, and only the money.

Interesting times. If they are banking on MetroBust to turn things around, the game is up.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page