Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:13 Par to Newquay
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 14:25:32 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Officially 5 cars?  (Read 13784 times)
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2019, 22:48:51 »

Warminster 1 o'clock this afternoon.

Two 16?s nailed together heading to Cardiff.  A two car 150 heading for Portsmouth Harbour.

Progress ??
Yes, but walking before running.  There are just supposed to be two sets of 165/166 diagrammed daily, but they haven’t enough to run them both at 5 car.
Paul

Sorry Paul, but I wouldn't describe what is happening on this line as "walking before running". The whole concept of replacing 158s with 165/6s is grossly flawed from the outset. To add insult to injury the existing (now nicely refurbished !) rolling stock is disappearing long before the replacement 165/6s are available and are being substituted by 150s. I don't call this progress - it is little more than a con-trick ! As I said in another thread, this is a repeat of the shambles when FGW (First Great Western) took over the franchise from Wessex.........except that this time the 3 car 158s are being replaced by 2 car 150s, instead of just 2 car 158s as they were then. Also, this time they are doing it to themselves - absolutely brilliant !!

The 150s were only working it due to a shortage on the day.  It frequently happens on the route, Turbos or not
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2019, 09:25:45 »


Yes, but there seem to be more and more days when there are "shortages". It used to be a bit of a rarity to see 150s working the Portsmouth trains - it isn't any more. The Gt Malvern services from Warminster & Southampton were often 150s, they were replaced by Turbos some months ago - the displaced 150s are still here being put to other use.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2019, 10:23:56 »

Having spent many years pootling to and fro Taplow/Paddington on ageing, overcrowded Turbos with all their foibles and shortcomings, I really don't envy anyone going all the way from Cardiff to Portsmouth on one.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2019, 10:27:40 »

Given the choice of a totally wedged 3-car 158 or a 5-car Turbo with room to spare on that route and I know which I’d choose.  Shame it couldn’t be 6-car 158s or 6-car 185s, or 5/6-car new build Bi-modes mind you.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #34 on: January 10, 2019, 11:35:19 »


Yes, but there seem to be more and more days when there are "shortages". It used to be a bit of a rarity to see 150s working the Portsmouth trains - it isn't any more. The Gt Malvern services from Warminster & Southampton were often 150s, they were replaced by Turbos some months ago - the displaced 150s are still here being put to other use.

The displaced 150s have transferred to the West of England but still visit but not in same numbers
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 10, 2019, 18:04:38 »

Given the choice of a totally wedged 3-car 158 or a 5-car Turbo with room to spare on that route and I know which I’d choose.  Shame it couldn’t be 6-car 158s or 6-car 185s, or 5/6-car new build Bi-modes mind you.

Perhaps, but over 3 hours on a Turbo? That's a pretty awful prospect, I cannot imagine that those trains were designed with such "long haul" trips in mind for passengers.

I can't imagine doing Reading to Plymouth on a Turbo.

Replacing one bad thing with a slightly less bad thing represents very little in terms of progress.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #36 on: January 10, 2019, 19:03:49 »

Perhaps, but over 3 hours on a Turbo? That's a pretty awful prospect, I cannot imagine that those trains were designed with such "long haul" trips in mind for passengers.

The idea of travelling 3 hours and 20 minutes - 200 minutes - on a turbo fills me with horror. That's a longer journey than London to Plymouth - and just imaging what the people of Plymouth would have to say about the turbo seating if it were fitted to an IET (Intercity Express Train) - the current grouches about hard seats and lack of buffet would look like just an opening skirmish.

But ...

The Cardiff to Portsmouth service suffers "Cross Country Syndrome". Just as the number of passengers departing on the 09:25 from Plymouth (the Dundee train) travelling all the way to Dundee is probably pretty small, so I suspect the number leaving Cardiff Central on a Portsmouth Harbour train and actually travelling to Portsmouth Harbour is likely to be pretty small.    Yes - there are noticeable numbers of through passengers at Birmingham / Sheffield / Newcastle / Edinburgh (or Bristol / Bath Spa / Salisbury / Southampton) but there's also a very high proportion of people off and on.   And many other people are using both of the trains in these examples for much shorter intermediate journeys, never going anywhere neither either end of the route, and not staying on the train for anything like the full journey time.

Does anyone here have a breakdown (or the knowledge to guess) how long / how many miles the average passenger on a Cadiff to Portsmouth train does on that train.   Or have any idea if they went through the train and surveyed at a random point how the journey times of people on there would break down?    I actually suspect you might find that the highest proportion of  people sitting on a turbo operating out of Bristol for over 80 minutes would be found if you surveyed as the train ran between Yeovil Pen Mill and Castle Cary!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Adrian
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 171


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 10, 2019, 20:38:48 »

Perhaps, but over 3 hours on a Turbo? That's a pretty awful prospect, I cannot imagine that those trains were designed with such "long haul" trips in mind for passengers.

I think going the whole distance on the 0900 Cardiff to Penzance (a 150) is an even worse prospect.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 10, 2019, 21:19:30 »

There should be people here who have found themselves on a two carriage turbo for 3+ hours from Hereford to London ...
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 11, 2019, 00:10:45 »

Given the choice of a totally wedged 3-car 158 or a 5-car Turbo with room to spare on that route and I know which I’d choose.  Shame it couldn’t be 6-car 158s or 6-car 185s, or 5/6-car new build Bi-modes mind you.

Perhaps, but over 3 hours on a Turbo? That's a pretty awful prospect, I cannot imagine that those trains were designed with such "long haul" trips in mind for passengers.

I can't imagine doing Reading to Plymouth on a Turbo.

Replacing one bad thing with a slightly less bad thing represents very little in terms of progress.

I'm not suggesting it's a perfect solution (in fact I even suggested what the perfect solution might be), but as didcotdean points out, they've been working journeys over over three hours since they were built nearly 30 years ago now in the form of Hereford to Paddington.

For me, Turbo's are fine if not too crowded, but I totally understand that your average journey on the inner Thames Valley routes would often be very crowded.  However, as Graham says, the number of long distance journeys is actually a small percentage.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 11, 2019, 10:49:03 »

My main experience over the years is on the Southampton to Portsmouth Harbour stretch of the route, and I’d estimate that sometimes about 25-30% of those on the train don’t pass through Southampton.  It will be interesting to see if the forthcoming SWR» (South Western Railway - about) fast service between Portsmouth and Southampton, which will take a similar time but in a 450, will draw many passengers away from the GWR (Great Western Railway) services. 

I guess much will depend on how it fits in with respect to changes to/from other services at Southampton?  Certainly with 5 services between Cosham or Fareham and Southampton (including the SWR all stations, and the 2 Southerns), there’s no obvious reason to choose the GWR over the 3 that will be one stop at Swanwick.  Being EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) they should be as fast including the stop.

Paul
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #41 on: January 16, 2019, 16:09:31 »

Seems to be a pair of the 165/166 combos regularly working to Portsmouth now. I must say they are a lot better looking than the 158s - externally anyway !

I have noticed that the drivers seem to approach the stations a lot more slowly that the 158s do. Are the brakes particularly sensitive or is this just relatively new drivers getting used to their new charges ?



1109 to P Harbour approaching Warminster this morning.
Logged
brooklea
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 313


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: January 16, 2019, 17:10:50 »

I have noticed that the drivers seem to approach the stations a lot more slowly that the 158s do. Are the brakes particularly sensitive or is this just relatively new drivers getting used to their new charges ?

1109 to P Harbour approaching Warminster this morning.

They will seem slow approaching Warminster from Westbury as there’s a 15mph speed restriction for Turbos through that particular platform.
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #43 on: January 16, 2019, 19:45:10 »

Ah ha ! Thank you.  However, I must ask why - as they have just rebuilt the whole of that platform as part of the lengthening process. 
Logged
brooklea
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 313


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 16, 2019, 20:27:32 »

Ah ha ! Thank you.  However, I must ask why - as they have just rebuilt the whole of that platform as part of the lengthening process. 
I suggest you ask Network Rail....! Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page