Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 28 Mar 2024
* Manhunt after stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 11:57:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[161] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[91] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[62] Return of the BRUTE?
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[49] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[38] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: Hydrogen Trains  (Read 21839 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #60 on: October 30, 2018, 15:52:32 »

In promoting this Grayling seems to be ignoring the high cost of producing hydrogen as well as the possible safety issues relating to a high pressure container of highly flammable gas.  Is he clutching at straws to justify his stance on electification?

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) yesterday

Quote
Trains powered by hydrogen could be a reality in the UK (United Kingdom) by the "early 2020s", according to Transport Secretary Chris Grayling.

They're seen as a cleaner - but pricier - alternative to diesel trains, as the exhaust emission is pure water.

The BBC's Roger Harrabin reports from Germany, where hydrogen trains are already running.
29 Oct 2018

Has technology move on in the last month to answer questions like:

1. How will the hydrogen be economically prepared?

2. More costly - in initial purchase or running, and who's going to pay?

3. Will timetables need to be altered to give refuelling time?

4. Will heavier trains mean they can't be used on some lighter branches?

5. Will the bigger on-train plant fit into the UK loading gauge?

6. Will in be safe?

Or are we relying  on research to solve some or all of those?

1) Only two methods are known for industrial scale hydrogen production. From natural gas, in which case use of compressed or liquefied natural gas would save the costs and loses involved in conversion to hydrogen.
Alternatively by electrolysis of water, this needs a great deal of electricity and the resultant hydrogen will at least twice of electricity.

2)Almost certainly a lot more expensive. Don't know whom will pay.

3)Possibly since I doubt that refueling with passengers on board, or refueling in a station will be allowed.

4)I doubt that it will be much heavier than diesel or battery power. Any increase would be by adding another vehicle, not by increased axle loads.

5)Yes, but it might mean an increase in train length for the hydrogen tanks and fuel cells.

6) It could probably be made safe, but each safety system adds weight, complexity, cost, and something else to go wrong. Each possibly minor accident would lead to extra safety measures.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: October 30, 2018, 17:02:21 »

My usual scepticism about hydrogen is slightly tempered by the fact that the Germans are trialling it. This gives me a bit more confidence that the practical difficulties can be overcome. As for supply, there is only one that makes any sense from a sustainability perspective, which is to produce it using electrolysis with surplus energy from wind and solar power, as this would help keep the Grid stable when renewables are peaking.

However, I fear that this is being seized upon by Grayling as yet another reason not to get in with electrification of our main lines. The Germans have already done theirs and are sensibly exploring new technology options that might at some point be useful in secondary routes and branches.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: October 31, 2018, 10:03:20 »

Exactly Smiley Smiley
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: November 05, 2018, 15:19:13 »

Exactly to which part?  Grin

The Germans trialling it should reassure us that it is feasible from an engineering point of view and safe. They don't cut corners - the old Four Sprung Duck Technique, y'know. But I still don't know where all this surplus energy from wind and solar power is going to come from. You get the odd highly-publicised day when Scotland actually produces more than its electricity (nor energy) needs from renewables, but that's only because the government there lets power companies stick wind farms on any hillside they like, there is much less demand for electricity in Scotland than in England, and the infrastructure to transfer any putative surplus south is a bit shaky to say the least. A look at Gridwatch shows that right now, a fairly breezy day, wind is bringing just over 6% of our electricity to the mix, around two thirds of what is being generated by coal. Gas is making up over half, and is the most flexible. So gas gets turned down when the wind blows harder. There has never been a day when there has been a surplus of wind power.

Whether produced by superheated steam knoking carbon atoms off methane or by electrolysis, hydrogen is a way of storing energy, not creating it. So what you put in isn't what you get out. Providing energy on a large scale to power trains would effectively be to add to our electricity consumption just as running an IET (Intercity Express Train) under the wires does. Mr Grayling could have expressed his green sympathies more clearly by finishing the electrification job, rather than cancelling crucial parts of it and buying lots of extra diesel engines for the brand new trains. So I say exactly, too.
Logged

Now, please!
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #64 on: November 05, 2018, 15:35:30 »

...A look at Gridwatch shows that right now, a fairly breezy day, wind is bringing just over 6% of our electricity to the mix, around two thirds of what is being generated by coal. Gas is making up over half, and is the most flexible. So gas gets turned down when the wind blows harder. There has never been a day when there has been a surplus of wind power.

I don't know why, but I've got visions of Chris Packham and Michaela Strachan in their den going "oh look, there's a lesser-spotted species of freshwater fish in the salmon family Salmonidae..."
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: November 05, 2018, 15:41:53 »

I don't know why, but I've got visions of Chris Packham and Michaela Strachan in their den going "oh look, there's a lesser-spotted species of freshwater fish in the salmon family Salmonidae..."

She's popped out to the chemist's - we've run out. But you don't need to put in the hours required for birdspotting to get a snapshot of the nation's energy production. A simple click on a link to http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ will suffice.

More later, but I have my OCD clinic at 3.49...
Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: November 05, 2018, 16:45:19 »

http://gridwatch.co.uk/ has, I think, the same source but to my mind presents it better. It is worth looking at the yearly graphs to get an overview of what comes from where.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: November 05, 2018, 17:23:47 »

http://gridwatch.co.uk/ has, I think, the same source but to my mind presents it better. It is worth looking at the yearly graphs to get an overview of what comes from where.

I agree, having seen it - thanks!

Edit, having looked a bit further: Those periodic graphs do rather confirm my point in picture form. There is never a time where there isn't gas being used. It is interesting to see that we import from France and the Netherlands whilst simultaneously export to Ireland.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2018, 17:33:40 by Four Track, Now! » Logged

Now, please!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: November 05, 2018, 17:54:18 »

It is interesting to see that we import from France and the Netherlands whilst simultaneously export to Ireland.

How else do the Irish import from France, or indeed anywhere else? They are currently looking into a direct "Celtic Interconnector", for which some EU» (European Union - about) money would be forthcoming.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: November 05, 2018, 18:22:40 »

It is interesting to see that we import from France and the Netherlands whilst simultaneously export to Ireland.

How else do the Irish import from France, or indeed anywhere else? They are currently looking into a direct "Celtic Interconnector", for which some EU» (European Union - about) money would be forthcoming.

I know, but the point is that we are importing electricity, generating it by coal, and exporting it to a country that was building wind farms specifically to export power to us. We might be buying it for tuppence and selling it for threepence or something, maybe offsetting something, or embezzling fivepence of a further sixpence, I dunno. International power broking was never my stronger suit. But I know that we could soon be importing electricity from Iceland in a few years' time, and also know, from my journey last month, that Iceland is a lot further to travel than Ireland. 1500 Km, to be not quite exact.We could flog a load of that the French, who have been kindly acting as our offshore nuclear facility for a while.
Logged

Now, please!
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: November 05, 2018, 21:11:19 »

Four Sprung Duck Technique,
Grin Grin Grin Grin
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: November 05, 2018, 21:19:07 »

We might be buying it for tuppence and selling it for threepence or something, maybe offsetting something, or embezzling fivepence of a further sixpence, I dunno. International power broking was never my stronger suit.

It's all explained here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0UV6ug96c0
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: November 22, 2018, 15:23:46 »

There's a report on "Hydrogen in a low-carbon economy" published today by the  Committee on Climate Change (an official body advising government): "This report by the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) assesses the potential role of hydrogen in the UK (United Kingdom)’s low-carbon economy."

Its headline conclusions do not seem to me to be borne out by its more detailed analysis; some of the ifs and buts have been downplayed. But (and note that this is based on a quick read only) basically they see hydrogen as replacing gas and oil in heating (buildings and processes), so it is needed in huge quantities. And for that they favour low-carbon sources like gas reforming with carbon capture and storage - no everyone's cup of tea. They don't like the idea of using the gas distribution network for hydrogen, preferring heat pumps with low-carbon (perhaps hydrogen) backup for cold days.

On its use in transport they are only luke-warm, due to the usual issues of storage space and distribution, and also note the difficulty of providing the ultra-pure hydrogen that fuel cells need from a general network also supplying homes. For transport they are saying batteries are going to be the normal solution - as for other uses outside their core heating ones, it's niches only for hydrogen.

Quote
We therefore conclude that hydrogen is best used selectively, where it adds most value alongside widespread electrification, improvements to energy and resource efficiency, and use of CCS in industry and on bioenergy. This means using hydrogen where the alternative is continuing to burn unabated fossil fuels or where there are limits to feasible electrification.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #73 on: April 26, 2019, 09:00:26 »

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/teesside-could-home-first-fleet-16179606

Quote from: Teeside Live
Teesside could become home to the UK (United Kingdom)'s first fleet of hydrogen-powered passenger trains.

Arriva, one of Europe's leading providers of passenger transport, wants to build a major facility on Teesside - to fuel and maintain ten HMU (Hydrogen Multiple Unit) trains.

It is eyeing up potential sites at Thornaby and Lackenby, with the first ultra-green trains expected to run by June 2021.

An initial screening report has been lodged with Stockton Council, in a move that could help cement Teesside's plans to be at the "centre of the UK's growing hydrogen economy".

The Government wants to take all diesel-only trains off UK tracks by 2040.

Hydrogen as a fuel gives enough range and is potentially zero-carbon, if used alongside renewables.

And Teesside, which produces half the UK's entire hydrogen supply through its heavy industries, is seen as the natural place to start.

If the project is successful, it could be rolled out across the Northern and wider National Rail networks.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page