Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- What contributed to the Baltimore Bridge collapse?
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
07:54 Looe to Liskeard
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:18 Yeovil Pen Mill to Filton Abbey Wood
06:48 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
07:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:35 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:08 Looe to Liskeard
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:36 Liskeard to Looe
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 08:35:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[155] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[124] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[85] Return of the BRUTE?
[67] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[29] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
  Print  
Author Topic: 165/166s on this route  (Read 31889 times)
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #60 on: September 05, 2018, 11:04:54 »

Many thanks for the correction Paul. Memory fade since I last had a serious interest in the subject.
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 513


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: September 05, 2018, 12:33:44 »

Bear in mind that the 80x's are 26m long vs 23m for a MK3. There was route clearance along the various routes used by HST (High Speed Train) stock (plus a few diversionary routes) as part of the IET (Intercity Express Train) project, but anything else will require that work to be done (assuming that a preliminary analysis doesn't find any big problems), plus potential beefing up of power supplies if you want to run them on third-rail. Then you'd need IET's to be ordered (and Hitachi have a fairly full order book), so it seems a little far-fetched.

There was a suggestion elsewhere that a passenger TOC (Train Operating Company) was in the market for tri-mode locomotives. If that's not platform-end wibble then perhaps someone might fancy the idea of some MK5's and locos for the run?.   
Logged
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: September 05, 2018, 18:05:40 »

Bear in mind that the 80x's are 26m long vs 23m for a MK3. There was route clearance along the various routes used by HST (High Speed Train) stock (plus a few diversionary routes) as part of the IET (Intercity Express Train) project, but anything else will require that work to be done (assuming that a preliminary analysis doesn't find any big problems), plus potential beefing up of power supplies if you want to run them on third-rail. Then you'd need IET's to be ordered (and Hitachi have a fairly full order book), so it seems a little far-fetched.

There was a suggestion elsewhere that a passenger TOC (Train Operating Company) was in the market for tri-mode locomotives. If that's not platform-end wibble then perhaps someone might fancy the idea of some MK5's and locos for the run?.   

Tri-mode 769's seem to be either one minute happening and the next minute not, almost like the TOC wanting to buy them so im sure they'll fit in perfectly. I do think HST Castle's would be a good short term option, although Network Rail might not be happy having to upgrade the line again as they already did not long ago for the 166s. 

According to Wikipedia the 158/9 Has 207 seats for a 3 car unit, a 166(288+24) or (192) and 165(186) make 474 seats or 402 with a 2x2 seating on a 166 , a 5 car Castle with a small First Class area would be: 372 + 24 using the composite coach, or 328 + 24 with a full buffet car.  So although a slight downgrade in capacity, there would be more comfort and allow for a trolley service for the entire train.

In relation to the Mk3 bogies, HST's including a 8 coach HST have already been to Portsmouth, although as someone mentioned not along the exact route.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #63 on: September 06, 2018, 12:02:00 »

Only partly on this line ... but an illustration of the issues.   From a Facebook friend

Quote
Forname Surname is at Dorset County Council.
Oh my days it felt far longer than it took to get here!

3 hours and 6 minutes from Gloucester to Dorchester - on a Turbo ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: September 06, 2018, 21:13:46 »

After my pleasant trip on a SWR» (South Western Railway - about) 159 - I think my trip today was in an even better carriage.
Nice two tone blue cloth and leather seats, not overly padded but most comfortable. A good smattering of "4 man" tables, plenty of leg room - no "kneesies" underneath ! USB charging sockets and reading lights at every seat. In daylight, only 50% of the fluorescent lights were on. Good width aisle. Nice big windows which lined up with most of the seats............What was this wondrous train ? it wasn't - it was the upper deck of the X3 bus from Salisbury to Bournemouth !!
If bus designers/builders can make such huge improvements why can't they do it on the trains ?
Logged
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 749


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: September 06, 2018, 22:04:26 »

The rail replacement bus I recently caught also surpassed the replaced Turbo on legroom and unimpeded view
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: September 07, 2018, 06:37:58 »

How sad it’s come to a place when people are saying buses are more comfortable than trains!
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: September 07, 2018, 08:32:51 »

How sad it’s come to a place when people are saying buses are more comfortable than trains!

Was talking to a lady on the new Y1 service to Yate on Wednesday who has switched from rail to the new Y1 because the train was getting too overcrowded and with the accelerated service via the M32 her front door to office desk journey was now only 5 minutes longer than by train.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #68 on: September 11, 2018, 20:49:58 »

Further to my previous post on this thread, the mystery of how the downgrading of the ex-first class section on the 165s will be achieved has been resolved, at least in relation to two car units.

The first leg of my journey this morning was on a two car unit where half the seats in the cab end of the former second only coach have been replaced by a luggage and cycle rack. I went for the ex-first class section in the other caoch, looking forward to a few minutes of 4 across (relative) comfort into Reading. Instead the section had been refitted with standard class Turbo seats (presumably recycled from the other end and others removed for disabled spaces on other units - they certainly looked well worn, the only new items being shiny floor bolts) in the standard class formation (4 across behind the cab, two rows of facing 5 across, then two rows of forward/cab facing 4 across).

One problem for the amenity of passengers - the end section built as standard class has a small window in the middle of the section, whereas there is a blank panel in the "first" end  where the middle two rows were "back to back" with a small space between them for luggage, often removed now. The lucky occupants of the new third row of seats therefore do not have a window (see attached). Someone has though fitted a new piece of old FGW (First Great Western) dark blue with white and pink spots lino to replace the distressed carpet! Presumable there are rolls of this store somewhere "just in case"?   

So - I calculate 12 seats removed from the old cab end of the DMOS, the bikes and luggage enjoying a window view all along their side. 16 ex-first seats replaced by 22 standard, five "without" windows at the other end in the ex-composite coach.

But why didn't someone think of converting the ex-first section? (Although - why bother is just as pertinent a question) 
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #69 on: November 28, 2018, 12:14:03 »

I am even more confused ! 
Someone has decreed that "old", 5 abreast seating, Class 165/166 commuter trains from the Thames Valley are now suitable for inter-regional use and are to be used on Cardiff to Portsmouth route.
Whilst wasting time at Paddington the other day I was looking at the new replacement trains (Class 387) for the 165/166 - these have 4 abreast seating !!

So London commuters, apparently, are not expected to suffer 5 abreast seating for, say an hour, from Reading into Paddington but passengers on Cardiff to Portsmouth are now expected to put up with this for, possibly, the best part of 4 hours.................
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: November 28, 2018, 17:15:40 »

So London commuters, apparently, are not expected to suffer 5 abreast seating for, say an hour, from Reading into Paddington but passengers on Cardiff to Portsmouth are now expected to put up with this for, possibly, the best part of 4 hours.................
That’s because no one cares about the Cardiff-Portsmouth line. Just put any rubbish to run this service. 165s/166s were not built for use as a cross country train. It’s best years were when BR (British Rail(ways)) introduced brand new 158’s to the line. Even today they are still good. GWR (Great Western Railway) have done a great job with the recent refurb. I for one will be a little sad to see them go. In my opinion the best DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) ever built.
Logged
Adrian
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 171


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: November 28, 2018, 19:52:22 »

So London commuters, apparently, are not expected to suffer 5 abreast seating for, say an hour, from Reading into Paddington but passengers on Cardiff to Portsmouth are now expected to put up with this for, possibly, the best part of 4 hours.................

I think I remember being told that the average journey length on the Cardiff - Portsmouth route was about 40 minutes.  A large proportion of short-distance commuters.

But for the benefit of the longer distance travellers, wouldn't it have been better to allocate the cut-down HSTs (High Speed Train) to this line?
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: November 28, 2018, 20:28:38 »

Quote
But for the benefit of the longer distance travellers, wouldn't it have been better to allocate the cut-down HSTs (High Speed Train) to this line?

A bold YES from me.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #73 on: November 28, 2018, 20:36:01 »

Quote
But for the benefit of the longer distance travellers, wouldn't it have been better to allocate the cut-down HSTs (High Speed Train) to this line?

A bold YES from me.

Hasn't it been said on here several times that the HSTs are not cleared to run beyond St Denys ?
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: November 28, 2018, 22:10:18 »

Quote
But for the benefit of the longer distance travellers, wouldn't it have been better to allocate the cut-down HSTs (High Speed Train) to this line?
A bold YES from me.
Hasn't it been said on here several times that the HSTs are not cleared to run beyond St Denys ?

There are two types of bogies utilised on the HST Mk3 carriages. LSL(resolve) (long swing link) and SSL (Short Swing Link bogies (125)) (short swing link) and HST sets  with SSL bogies are cleared to run on third rail electrified lines although there may be local restrictions in some places. Such fitted carriages can be identified by the letters SSL on the carriage ends. HST's have run to Portsmouth Harbour one of which was a VSTP working when one of the Bristol Football teams played Portsmouth and the brains at GWR (Great Western Railway) worked out that all the fans who travelled out would not be able to be shoehorned into the remaining scheduled services on the day of the match to return to Bristol and fearing unrest the VSTP Zulu special was organised. And, of course the HST operated Summer Saturdays Weymouth Wizard utilised a SSL fitted HST set.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page