Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 19 Apr 2024
- Blasts heard near airport and army base, Iran media says
* Children among nine dead in Russia strike on Ukraine
- Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
Short Run
07:57 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
08:23 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
09:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 10:04:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[156] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[109] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[63] Signage - not making it easy ...
[13] IETs at Melksham
[12] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[11] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: RAIB report on near miss with track workers October 2017  (Read 1125 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« on: August 09, 2018, 22:54:57 »

This one is very sobering reading. About as close as you can get to multiple fatalities. Just one second between track workers clearing the track and a train travelling at 125 mph passing them.

https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/report-11-2018-near-miss-with-a-group-of-track-workers-at-egmanton-level-crossing


Quote
Summary
At around 11:22 hrs on 5 October 2017, a group of track workers narrowly avoided being struck by a train close to Egmanton level crossing, between Newark North Gate and Retford on the East Coast Main Line. A high speed passenger train was approaching the level crossing on the Down Main line at the maximum permitted line speed of 125 mph (201 km/h), when the driver saw a group of track workers in the distance. He sounded the train’s warning horn, but saw no response from the group. A few seconds later the driver gave a series of short blasts on the train horn as it approached, and passed, the track workers.

The track workers became aware of the train about three seconds before it reached them. One of the group shouted a warning to three others who were between the running rails of the Down Main line. These three workers cleared the track about one second before the train passed them. During this time the driver had continued to sound the horn and made an emergency brake application before the train passed the point where the group had been working, thinking his train might strike one or more of them. The train subsequently came to a stand around 0.75 miles (1.2 km) after passing the site of work.

The immediate cause of the near miss was that the track workers did not move to a position of safety as the train approached. The group had been working under an unsafe and unofficial system of work, set up by the Person in Charge (PiC). Instead of adhering to the correct method of using the Train Operated Warning System (TOWS) by moving his team to, and remaining in, a position of safety while TOWS was warning of an approaching train, the PiC used the audible warning as a cue for the lookout to start looking out for approaching trains in order to maximise the working time of the group on the track. This unsafe system of work broke down when both the lookout and the PiC became distracted and forgot about the TOWS warning them of the approaching train.

Although the PiC was qualified, experienced and was deemed competent by his employer, neither his training nor reassessments had instilled in him an adequate regard for safety and the importance of following the rules and procedures. Additionally, none of the team involved challenged the unsafe system of work that was in place at the time. Even though some were uncomfortable with it, they feared they might lose the work as contractors if they challenged the PiC.

Recommendations

As a result of its investigation the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) has made three recommendations. These relate to:

- strengthening safety leadership behaviour on site and reducing the occurrences of potentially dangerous rule breaking by those responsible for setting up and maintaining safe systems of work

- mitigating the potentially adverse effect that client-contractor relationships can have on the integrity of the Worksafe procedure such that contractors’ staff feel unable to challenge unsafe systems of work for fear of losing work

- clarifying to staff how the Train Operated Warning System (TOWS) should be used

The findings of this investigation have also reinforced the importance of railway staff understanding their safety briefings, and challenging any system of work that they believe to be unsafe.


Chilling.  Shocked

I'm loathe to wish ill on anyone doing a difficult job, but I do hope that PiC is no longer employed in any safety critical role. What he did is surely a slam dunk gross misconduct. Maybe even a HSE (Health and Safety Executive) prosecution.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2018, 23:02:42 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2018, 13:30:18 »

Oh dear.

Another near miss on the ECML (East Coast Main Line). This time near Peterborough.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/near-miss-with-track-worker-peterborough

Degraded safety again.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2018, 21:17:35 »

The days of Red Zone Working on NR» (Network Rail - home page) are surely diminishing.   Many contractors do not permit their employees to work Red Zone.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2018, 21:30:26 »

The days of Red Zone Working on NR» (Network Rail - home page) are surely diminishing.   Many contractors do not permit their employees to work Red Zone.
How can you maintain a railway by watching it working without 'Red Zone Working'?.....
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1930


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2018, 13:36:25 »

The phrase from the report that jumped out at me was:
Quote
The nature of the client/contractor relationship stifled any effective challenge to the
...
Unfortunately this is all to common in a wide range of public service contracts with the private sector. As has ben reported recently in the media, if the department/minister does challenge, the "contractor" then threatens legal action upon which the department/minister tend to roll over.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2018, 14:26:13 »

The phrase from the report that jumped out at me was:
Quote
The nature of the client/contractor relationship stifled any effective challenge to the
...
Unfortunately this is all to common in a wide range of public service contracts with the private sector. As has ben reported recently in the media, if the department/minister does challenge, the "contractor" then threatens legal action upon which the department/minister tend to roll over.

Evidently the following paragraphs didn't jump as much. That point was about a contractor's employees challenging a Network Rail supervisor. It's hard enough to convince your own employees that they must challenge unsafe practices by someone with authority, and they won't suffer by doing so. Getting the same message, or even the official guidance and methods, across to those who work for someone else is much more difficult.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2018, 18:12:30 »

The days of Red Zone Working on NR» (Network Rail - home page) are surely diminishing.   Many contractors do not permit their employees to work Red Zone.
How can you maintain a railway by watching it working without 'Red Zone Working'?.....

The Dutch Railways effectively barred the equivalent to our Red Zone working about 8 years ago.  In the UK (United Kingdom) HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) has a complete ban on Red Zone
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page