Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:55 19 Mar 2024
- Potholes leave nations' roads at 'breaking point'
- The US Navy's relentless battle against Houthi attacks
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - WWRUG AGM
23/03/24 - Trains restart - Minehead
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

No 'On This Day' events reported for 19th Mar

Train RunningCancelled
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:43 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
08:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
07:24 Taunton to London Paddington
07:25 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington
07:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
08:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 25/03 16:00 Easter Escape - to where?
Closed 2024-03-16 Should our rail network go cashless
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 19, 2024, 09:09:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[159] A daily picture from my recent travels
[78] Where would you recommend for an Easter Escape?
[68] More travels ... more looking at how others do it ...
[66] M25 motorway issue: a most illuminating Twitter thread.
[55] Briefing on forthcoming changes - from GWR on 14.3.2024
[35] Europeran Rail Timetable
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Summer Saturday Westbury to Weymouth peak - 2018 v previous years  (Read 3616 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 19, 2018, 07:36:54 »

I happened to be at Westbury yesterday (headed elsewhere) and noted the departure of the regular train and the Weymouth Was-ard ...a couple of observations about provision (or lack of it) for the flow for a day out on the beach on this (overcast) summer Saturday ...

From Westbury yesterday:
06:54 - Cancelled
09:33 - Two carriages, full, standing and indeed "denied boarding" at Westbury with the train manage suggesting to some people on the platform that they wait for the following train "just 20 minutes behind".
09:54 - Three carriages - only around a half of the seats (average) looked occupied as the train left Westbury with rear carriage sparse.
I did not wait around for the 10:37 ... but then I see that as post-peak; people headed out for the day tend to be well on their way before then.

To compare to a typical 2017 high summer Saturday:
06:54 - Two carriages
09:33 - Five carriages
09:54 - Eight carriages, typically promote ahead of the previous train where the market can be lead.

So yesterday we had 15 carriages down to 5.   And of those 5 two were already very uncomfortable-looking as the train oft Westbury. Goodness only knows what it got like south of Yeovil, which in previous years has generated a major flow south to the seaside.    And goodness only knows what the arrangements were for the trip home.

Edit to add ... yesterday's 09:33 at Westbury:

Bear in mind that already on board were passengers from Bristol, Bath, Bradford-on-Avon, Trowbridge and intermediate stations too.  And it still had to pick up from places such as Frome and Yeovil.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2018, 08:07:58 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2006



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2018, 08:14:54 »

So yesterday we had 15 carriages down to 5.   And of those 5 two were already very uncomfortable-looking as the train oft Westbury. Goodness only knows what it got like south of Yeovil, which in previous years has generated a major flow south to the seaside.    And goodness only knows what the arrangements were for the trip home.

Not forgetting also that the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) offering from Yeovil to Weymouth was non-existent yesterday.
Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1447



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2018, 08:48:02 »

Add to that the 2050 Bristol Weymouth terminated at Westbury for onward bus replacement, adding hours to the journey. No guard
It must have been galling to see it disappear to the west, running ecs to Weymouth
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7723



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2018, 10:29:46 »

I would imagine those heading for the English Riviera from London/the South East yesterday felt much the same.
Logged
CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2018, 16:35:39 »

It’s a shame because the HST (High Speed Train) was a great benefit on the line, and it was in a place that was needed. The route should be 5 or 6 car Turbos, but GWR (Great Western Railway) is a mess at the moment so many reasons why not.

Turbos provide lower comfort quality, and I remember traveling one Saturday two or so years ago and people were commenting on how it’s “comfy” “better than the last time we came” comparing with a 150 or 158, and they do not have 3x2 seating.

If the IETs (Intercity Express Train) were cleared it would have been great to be able to operate them across areas of the network that may be busy that would normally be operated by commuter or regional trains but there you go, what a shame.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7723



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2018, 17:42:18 »

It’s a shame because the HST (High Speed Train) was a great benefit on the line, and it was in a place that was needed. The route should be 5 or 6 car Turbos, but GWR (Great Western Railway) is a mess at the moment so many reasons why not.

Turbos provide lower comfort quality, and I remember traveling one Saturday two or so years ago and people were commenting on how it’s “comfy” “better than the last time we came” comparing with a 150 or 158, and they do not have 3x2 seating.

If the IETs (Intercity Express Train) were cleared it would have been great to be able to operate them across areas of the network that may be busy that would normally be operated by commuter or regional trains but there you go, what a shame.


Never went on it myself, but my understanding was that the HST used on summer Saturdays to Weymouth was rarely full, and I seem to remember reading an article saying that it sat at Weymouth station belching out fumes all day prior to the journey back?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2018, 18:27:28 »

It’s a shame because the HST (High Speed Train) was a great benefit on the line, and it was in a place that was needed.

Never went on it myself, but my understanding was that the HST used on summer Saturdays to Weymouth was rarely full, and I seem to remember reading an article saying that it sat at Weymouth station belching out fumes all day prior to the journey back?


There is no smoke without fire, but you certainly cannot believe everything you read.   It was certainly a solution to the problem it was initially instigated to sort out, but really wasn't perfect.  But then for about 14 days maximum out of 365, you cannot expect perfection - especially when the vagaries of the weather and seasonality and events conspire to make your loadings go up and down like a yoyo.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Rob on the hill
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 354


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2018, 19:33:18 »

I seem to remember reading an article saying that it sat at Weymouth station belching out fumes all day prior to the journey back?

It would seem that a solution to this was found:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-36557083

Quote
A GWR (Great Western Railway) spokesman said: "Generally engines need to run to provide and maintain the air supply for the doors and brakes systems to work.

"Safety checks need to be carried out before the train can go into service and these checks require the engine to be running."

But he admitted it should not happen for five hours and said new procedures had since been introduced at Weymouth which involved both engines being shut down once checks had been carried out.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2018, 19:45:23 »

I seem to remember reading an article saying that it sat at Weymouth station belching out fumes all day prior to the journey back?

It would seem that a solution to this was found:


Never was Weymouth Station anyway!!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10081


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2018, 21:18:15 »

Two, sometimes three, HSTs (High Speed Train) sit all night at Worcester with one of their engines running and that’s every night of the week!  Not for too much longer of course, but whether Hitachi will permit 800/2s to stable there is currently a bit of a sticking point!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Christina Biggs FOSBR
Full Member
***
Posts: 33


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: August 20, 2018, 09:23:49 »

I've just had a complaint from a Bristol resident about trains idling for "nearly 15 minutes" as they wait on the double-tracked section outside Clifton Down station waiting for the Redland train. I guess the cumulative impact of trains every 40 minutes doing that might be as bad as one sitting once a week for five hours, but if GWR (Great Western Railway) think they couldn't shut down a 5 hour idle  (until there was a complaint) what hope is there for fifteen minutes??

Tina
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2018, 09:59:09 »

I seem to remember reading an article saying that it sat at Weymouth station belching out fumes all day prior to the journey back?

It would seem that a solution to this was found:


Never was Weymouth Station anyway!!

Was in Jersey Sidings
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: August 20, 2018, 10:45:54 »

I've just had a complaint from a Bristol resident about trains idling for "nearly 15 minutes" as they wait on the double-tracked section outside Clifton Down station waiting for the Redland train.

I would guess that the 15 minutes is when there's significant disruption?   "Should get much better with reliability and that will come with 4 tracks ..." should you believe that.   Seriously - 15 minutes indicates a massive problem with the service if it's more than once in a blue moon.

Of course, if the line were to be electrified ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page