Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 29 Mar 2024
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
* KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 11:44:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[49] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[48] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[43] Return of the BRUTE?
[30] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Economics of operation of shorter trains  (Read 2126 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 21, 2018, 06:51:49 »

Posting here in "Bristol Commuters" because my question / examples are for the St Philip's Marsh based 15x and 16x fleets - but the question asked may be wider.

Looking back many years on this forum, I recall discussions looking at the economic case for adding a third carriage to a two car train to help reduce / eliminate overcrowding, and coming to the conclusion that adding a third carriage was a pretty expensive proposition for a short section of a peak journey.  The number of extra passengers generated for "the 12 minutes from Keynsham to Temple Meads in the morning and the 6 minutes back at night" were going to be paying at the fare box way below the hire and maintenance cost of that extra carriage through the year, and during the rest of the day it was going to be over-provision.   Of course, market (customer) sentiment and potential growth were factors which encourgaed provision of the extra capacity even if it wasn' paying for itself straight away.

I'm seeing lots of short forms and crowding at present and I am aware that much of it is caused by a reduction in the number of trains coming into the Bristol area with things like electrification to Oxford and some of the Thames branches not happeneing as scheduled, so reducing cascades, with at the same time most 150/1s and 153s headed off to pastures new, as it seems that cascades in can be delayed, but cascades out cannot.  But a question - is in financially convenient to be running shorter trains, loosing not-too-many passengers because they will cram in, and loosing less-than-might-be expected goodwill because you can point at the modernisation program and assure people that (a) you as the operator are the victim of circumstances and (b) you (as a train operator) are a victim of the hand you have been given.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 901


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2018, 07:44:16 »

I was going to post today about travelling on just such a service yesterday, the 1648 from Temple Meads, which is the first train for an hour to make the stopping journey to Bath, so is always exceptionally crowded, this being the rush hour. It was run as a two carriage train yesterday and was horrendously overcrowded, to the point where some people couldn't get on, which if they were going towards Weymouth would have meant they were very heavily delayed.

Overcrowding like this does put people off using trains altogether. It is a comment I've often heard from other customers, either friends or those who happen to be in the same carriage as me. But it has other detrimental effects as well. An example from yesterday is a family of five who were sat in my carriage, the woman heavily pregnant and three young children about 5 years old and upwards. They wanted to get out at Keynsham, but it was almost impossible for them to get past all those who were having to stand in the aisle. They were still some distance from the door when the bleeper went to indicate the doors were shutting. Fortunately we all shouted down the carriage and someone standing near the door managed to stop it shutting, presumably by standing in the doorway, though I would personally find that just as unnerving. But it must have been incredibly stressful for them.

At Temple Meads the train was supposed to be on platform 11 but was sat somewhere in the nether region between 11 and 12, so that some of those who came up the stairs presumed their train hadn't yet come in because it looked as if the only train was on platform 12 (I could only just read the destination on the train by walking down towards it). I'm sure there were some who missed the chance of trying to get on because of that, I certainly saw many people running down the platform at the last minute. One bit of me wonders whether this might have been deliberate, given that it was obvious not everyone who wanted to get on would be able to.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 901


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2018, 08:13:41 »

I should add that Graham talks about the crowding from Temple Meads to Keynsham, but the crowding lasts far longer than that. Certainly always to Oldfield Park, but on the few journeys at rush hour I've taken eastwards from there, the trains have always been packed at the least, and on occasions severely overcrowded, right down to Bradford on Avon and Trowbridge. Economically, having extra carriages on these services at least as far as Westbury must make sense.
Logged
WSW Frome
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 180


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2018, 11:03:07 »

The unit used for the 16.48 BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains)-WEY has typically been a 3 car 158 operating from a Brighton/Great Malvern diagram. It then forms the 20.21 WEY-BRI and home to its bed.

So is the current situation due to a diagram change, or simply the ongoing rolling stock problems and related chaos?
Logged
RA
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 201


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2018, 15:13:28 »


At Temple Meads the train was supposed to be on platform 11 but was sat somewhere in the nether region between 11 and 12, so that some of those who came up the stairs presumed their train hadn't yet come in because it looked as if the only train was on platform 12 (I could only just read the destination on the train by walking down towards it). I'm sure there were some who missed the chance of trying to get on because of that, I certainly saw many people running down the platform at the last minute. One bit of me wonders whether this might have been deliberate, given that it was obvious not everyone who wanted to get on would be able to.

This is unfortunately a side effect of the Bristol Temple Meads resignalling. Trains that reverse at Temple Meads must now stop just short of the blue boxes found on the platform edge below the mid-platform signals (the signals that split the platforms into odd and even numbers). The shorter the train, the further away it will be from the stairs. Not too bad on platforms 5 and 7, a bit of a walk on platforms 9 and 11 but a very long hike on platform 3!

As trains are now required to stop close to the mid-platform signals and the signals are close together back to back, a 10 miles per hour speed limit applies to all trains entering platforms 3-12 to mitigate against a collision between trains in such platforms; another side effect of the resignalling!
« Last Edit: August 21, 2018, 15:20:48 by RA » Logged
WelshBluebird
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 158


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2018, 15:30:24 »

At Temple Meads the train was supposed to be on platform 11 but was sat somewhere in the nether region between 11 and 12, so that some of those who came up the stairs presumed their train hadn't yet come in because it looked as if the only train was on platform 12 (I could only just read the destination on the train by walking down towards it). I'm sure there were some who missed the chance of trying to get on because of that, I certainly saw many people running down the platform at the last minute. One bit of me wonders whether this might have been deliberate, given that it was obvious not everyone who wanted to get on would be able to.

The stopping locations have changed since the works around Easter time, whilst I can't remember exactly where it now is, I do remember the stopping location for platform 11 having changed a fair bit so that it is now basically around where the Pumpkin cafe is. (edit, I see RA has replied in the time I was typing this saying the same!).

I should add that Graham talks about the crowding from Temple Meads to Keynsham, but the crowding lasts far longer than that. Certainly always to Oldfield Park, but on the few journeys at rush hour I've taken eastwards from there, the trains have always been packed at the least, and on occasions severely overcrowded, right down to Bradford on Avon and Trowbridge. Economically, having extra carriages on these services at least as far as Westbury must make sense.

You also have the problem of people jumping on these trains to get to Bath, when in an ideal world they'd be getting the Cardiff - Portsmouth services (well maybe not yet, but when they start to run as 5 car turbos), or even better the London bound high speed services.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 901


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2018, 17:13:20 »


At Temple Meads the train was supposed to be on platform 11 but was sat somewhere in the nether region between 11 and 12, so that some of those who came up the stairs presumed their train hadn't yet come in because it looked as if the only train was on platform 12 (I could only just read the destination on the train by walking down towards it). I'm sure there were some who missed the chance of trying to get on because of that, I certainly saw many people running down the platform at the last minute. One bit of me wonders whether this might have been deliberate, given that it was obvious not everyone who wanted to get on would be able to.

This is unfortunately a side effect of the Bristol Temple Meads resignalling. Trains that reverse at Temple Meads must now stop just short of the blue boxes found on the platform edge below the mid-platform signals (the signals that split the platforms into odd and even numbers). The shorter the train, the further away it will be from the stairs. Not too bad on platforms 5 and 7, a bit of a walk on platforms 9 and 11 but a very long hike on platform 3!

As trains are now required to stop close to the mid-platform signals and the signals are close together back to back, a 10 miles per hour speed limit applies to all trains entering platforms 3-12 to mitigate against a collision between trains in such platforms; another side effect of the resignalling!

It is a pity there is nothing to tell passengers this. When you come up the stairs and find lots of other people waiting on the platform there, you assume it is for the next train shown as timetabled for there.
Logged
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2018, 12:06:19 »

Sadly they didn't alter the signage to accommodate the alterations. Certainly the subway should have been altered to indicate platform 11 is also up the other stairs would have helped.

Also there used to be platform announcements regarding Bath passengers trying to get on short formed trains that there were more comfortable options. That seems to have stopped and it's now a free for all.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 901


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2018, 12:48:31 »



Also there used to be platform announcements regarding Bath passengers trying to get on short formed trains that there were more comfortable options. That seems to have stopped and it's now a free for all.

It's actually worse than that. A few days ago, when the fast train to Bath Spa was running late, the announcement just advised people going to Bath that the next train there was now the stopping train, which consequently was in even more demand by all those who had been waiting for the HST (High Speed Train).
Logged
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2018, 16:51:30 »

Lunacy.  Roll Eyes

At least when the Pompey is a little late running the regular Bathites are in the starting blocks to swap platforms knowing the PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) will be let out first.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page