Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:15 19 Mar 2024
* Potholes leave nations' roads at 'breaking point'
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - WWRUG AGM
23/03/24 - Trains restart - Minehead
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

No 'On This Day' events reported for 19th Mar

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 25/03 16:00 Easter Escape - to where?
Closed 2024-03-16 Should our rail network go cashless
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 19, 2024, 02:16:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[99] Where would you recommend for an Easter Escape?
[99] More travels ... more looking at how others do it ...
[95] M25 motorway issue: a most illuminating Twitter thread.
[80] Briefing on forthcoming changes - from GWR on 14.3.2024
[51] Europeran Rail Timetable
[51] Improvements at three Berkshire stations
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Should Heart Of Wessex Transfer To South Western Franchise?  (Read 5208 times)
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1447



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2018, 17:55:36 »

The services from Gt Malvern to Weymouth have a poor record of punctuality:

https://www.recenttraintimes.co.uk/Home/Search?Op=Srch&Fr=Great+Malvern+%28GMV%29&To=Weymouth+%28WEY%29&TimTyp=A&TimDay=4p&Days=Wk&TimPer=12w&dtFr=&dtTo=&ShwTim=AvAr&MxArCl=10&TOC=All&ArrSta=5&MetAvg=Mea&MetSpr=RT&MxScDu=&MxSvAg=&MnScCt=

Often turned back at Worcester in order to reclaim time, they still have to negotiate the junctions at Abbotswood and Gloucester. At both of these they are subordinate to XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services and will be held which could delay them further.
One has to wonder if it would be better to return to running Weymouth to Bristol to avoid this delay. Perhaps one could include Gloucester but one has to ask whether there is a demand from the south for a Gt Malvern service.
Logged
devonexpress
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2018, 22:40:02 »

It would make more sense, it would also allow for a more frequent timetable.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40644



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #17 on: September 04, 2018, 04:16:37 »

It would make more sense, it would also allow for a more frequent timetable.

Whoever runs it will need rolling stock and line capacity.

The work done by SWR» (South Western Railway - about) earlier this year (looking at handling the Yeovil to Bristol flow) for the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) as part of their franchise (4 other cross border routes looked at too) has gone into some detail.  Rolling stock can be somewhat found by releasing resource that's inefficient in its current use in Wiltshire, added to which a second local (MetroWest) train service into Westbury in each hour gives timing options.   Whether the trains are St Phillips Marsh or Salisbury based (so SWR or GWR (Great Western Railway)) is academic in terms of frequency though, as neither depot has a thin air machine ...

There is a trend towards clock face services these days, and (with rolling stock) you could run an hourly Bristol to Yeovil service and an hourly Yeovil to Weymouth service. Slight problem being that you couldn't join them up with just a couple of minutes for every train at Yeovil while it let passengers off and on.   A train every 90 minutes might be possible ... but by the time you're doing that you're going to move some existing services so much as to adversely effect people's daily lives and actually thin out rather than thicken the service in peak flow directions - such as reducing the number of trains into Weymouth on a summer weekend morning.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1447



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2018, 09:04:20 »

Another factor to be considered is the use by SWR» (South Western Railway - about) for their services and the paths needed for GWR (Great Western Railway) diversions. These will reduce potential occupation by Weymouth services between Castle Cary and Yeovil
.
There is a plan to add section signals between Yeovil and Castle Cary, as was done at Crewkerne. This will allow fleeting of trains in each direction.

One thought, which would need further investigation, is the possibility of splitting and joining the service at Yeovil. One would run to Weymouth and the other to the Junction. On return from the Junction, it joins up with the next Weymouth service. However, as I mentioned it would need a more detailed look at the timings.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page