Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 29 Mar 2024
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
* KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 11:22:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[52] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[51] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[32] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What happened to the TUCCs / Where do I go these days??  (Read 2637 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: September 16, 2018, 08:59:54 »

I took a call yesterday evening from a somewhat unhappy gentleman. Looking for the Transport User's Consultative Committee / Rail Passengers Committee for Western England. These were set up in 1962 and lasted in some form until 2005.

Quote
The Central Transport Consultative Committee took the place of a similar body that had been created under the Transport Act 1947 to represent users of the railway, and Area Transport Users Consultative Committees covered individual areas of the country.

The Committees were to make recommendations relating to the services provided by the four Boards, although their remit did not include the charges and fares. The Minister was not bound to follow any recommendations.

Some functionality may now be found in Transport focus (formally Passenger Focus)

Quote
Transport Focus is a watchdog for transport passengers and road users in the United Kingdom, based in London and Manchester. It was known as Passenger Focus until March 2015.[1] It is an executive non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Department for Transport.

But is should be noted that it's characterised as a watchdog – with a slant towards handling failures to deliver to specification (pressing train operators to perform to contract) and to the generation of customer feedback information – where it does an excellent job.  It does now include fares within its remit, but it lacks a role in forward planning and feeding customer suggestions into the system.

So – my questioner asked me - "Where do I go to get my views heard – to have my inputs into the way the transport system I use will be in the future". I'm not sure that the Transport Users Consultative Committees were even the place, nor how effective they were; we tend to see things through rosy tinted spectacles, but certainly these days there is no such supposedly central point.

1. DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and other consultations (e.g. Rail Delivery Group on fares)
2. Individual Train Operator "meet the manager" and "customer forum"s
3. Your local Passenger Transport Authority (e.g. WECA» (West of England Combined Authority - about), Wiltshire Council)
4. Your Member of Parliament
5. Transport Focus
6. Your local Community Rail Partnership or Rail User Group
7. Your Local Enterprise Partnership

All of which make for a pretty un-coordinated set of inputs, a setup so complex that it's hard to know who to go to about what, and a system under which – whoever you approach – you can simply be referred on to someone else. You're also likely to register in a count of inputs (especially with a consultation) which various bodies, to varying degrees, use to confirm that they are meeting their obligations to listen to the public.  But make no mistake, it is difficult and expensive for these organisations to field the wide and wild variety of inputs they receive, most that come from individuals being good ideas to the originator, but failing in the practicality stakes because...
a) Won't work operationally
b) Cost a lot of money that has to come from somewhere / will lessen operator profit
c) Great for the proposer, but mucks things up for someone else / created more problems
d) Falls foul of legal hurdles
e) Doesn't fit longer term strategies
f) There's no-one charged with / willing and able to take it forward, or they don't have the staff
g) It would set a precedent that "they" are fearful of
h) Would not be popular with [name a noisy group / population segment]
i) Too much of a risk, especially if the proposer doesn't stick around to support
j) Based on factors that are far too optimistic (people say they will use, but don't)

OK. TravelWatch SouthWest. Not a replacement for the Consultative Committees, but it does provide a route through which (at the general meetings) all the various community groups can:
i) Meet up and make contacts
ii) Learn from each other and from transport industry folks and civil servants
iii) Set up their own follow ups – helping the best of cases to come together in a stronger combined case
TravelWatch also sets up occasional more specific meetings – covering whole-regional issues such as new rail franchises, or areas where new thinking / laws / regulation are on their way in.  Examples are the Bus Services Bill / Act work of last year, and the GWR (Great Western Railway) and XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) franchise consultations this year. Upcoming, eyes are on various elements such as the way infrastructure expenditure which was routed via EU» (European Union - about) regional development will go next year.  These extra elements give
iv) Combined inputs with some authority at critical times
v) Food for thought to groups and individuals who can support the common line that will work for everyone.

TravelWatch SouthWest is not a replacement for the TUCC – it lacks statutory powers and it's run very 'lightweight' by a team of volunteer directors with (in most cases) many years of experience, who are public transport advocates, and who are surprisingly capable of thinking and commenting outside the box, including being the 'critical friend'.  Gaps remain in community input / provision – such as guidance and training for newcomers, and indeed my role at TWSW» (TravelWatch SouthWest - website) to some extent helps move into that gap – having come up through the community route – I have no government nor rail industry experience.  We also have some excellent (but time limited) paid admin / organisational support - and with transport and executive experience that's put to good effect too.

Follow up question - "If you have no powers, [why] do government / rail listen to you, and can you get the likes of Mark Hopwood along to talk?"

It is in the common interest for public transport providers and their customer and potential customer base to co-operate on reaching mutual goals, and those goals line up / are mutual most of the time.  Far better for the providers to have well thought out and mutually compatible inputs than ideas that don't work with each other or can't be implemented, and far better for the interested customer to know how to tune his inputs (and where to make them) such that they are effective and can head towards a positive result.

It's rarely easy to get the top industry / government people to talk to you as an individual or a small local group
001) there are so many small local groups it would be less that efficient for them (leaving little time to do anything else)
010) meeting small local groups may be cause concerns that the meetings are more about protest than progress
011) local groups tend to overall be less fully informed, and an alternative representative may be better than the top poncho

So – yes, TravelWatch is listened to. That's a very very long way from saying "we get our way" but we do recognise some of our inputs in the ongoing franchise consultation responses and ITT (Invitation to Tender) projects, for example, and other steers behind the scenes may be noted in things like timetable and fare responses.  In the end, it's very hard to say that "X caused Y to happen" because it's all about teamwork, working together, partnership. And open partnership with ideas and comments flowing around.



Next TravelWatch general meeting - 6th October.  http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19659

Comment / thoughts / corrections / additions to above most welcome
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2018, 10:55:42 »

Part of the fight campaigners such as myself fought against the Closure Guidance changes of the mid-2000s was the associated neutering of the TUCC system. I wasn't hugely enamoured with TravelWatch SouthWest either during that period which also encompassed the battles against the December 2006 Draft FGW (First Great Western) Timetable - They were pumping out some very heavily pro-FGW material, which was hardly surprising given the prominence of their bus and rail company sponsorship.

As those who know me will be aware, I do extensive research before I come to a definitive view on something, which means it generally takes an awful lot to convince me to change that view once I've formed it. However, I can honestly say that TravelWatch SouthWest is one of those rare examples of where my view has been changed.

When the TransWilts rail service was reduced to near-extinction in 2006, I uncovered significant evidence in Network Rail plans that part of the reason that TransWilts got nothing at all while others got at least some concessions was that the paths needed to be kept clear for a projected big increase in freight traffic. I detailed all this in my "The Freight Angle" series of articles at the time, but was generally dismissed as a conspiracy theorist by those higher up. However, at pretty much all of the public meetings I attended at the time, one such "higher-up" would always back me to the hilt when I raised the freight issue. His name was Chris Irwin, and he was the head of TravelWatch SouthWest during this period. He had taken the time to read all my articles, assessed them in depth, and was convinced that I was right.

His backing made a big difference to the credibility of how my case was viewed officially, and I'm sure helped to lead to Network Rail admitting their intentions in 2008. Since then there has been a far better level of open engagement between all the relevant parties, and policy to accommodate projected future passenger and freight growth is now increasingly focussed on the kind of necessary infrastructure enhancements that grahame and others have always advocated.

TravelWatch SouthWest as an organisation, and in terms of its output has definitely become more balanced over the years since as well, and that I'm sure is partly due to the inclusion of people like grahame on the board who you certainly cant consider to be bus/rail company yes-people.

I can also confirm that, whether as an individual or as a representative of an organisation such as TransWilts, CoffeeShop etc, I have always been granted an invitation to TravelWatch SouthWest events when I've requested one, and always been made to feel welcome at such events.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2018, 13:20:38 »

Grahame, I thought the Great Western Coffee Shop was the place to go with ideas about forward planning? Wink
« Last Edit: September 16, 2018, 14:26:18 by SandTEngineer » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2018, 14:01:10 »

Grahame, I thought the Great Western Coffee Shop was the place to go with ideas about forward planning? Wink

Many a true word written in jest.

I tried in my original post to list those with official or mainstream roles / routes into the decision makers. The Coffee Shop is styled as a "by passengers, for passengers".   Exceptionally useful in helping inform each other, and surprisingly often read by those who do help decide on the route ahead, but I would discourage anyone from posting here and feeling that in doing so they have taken the appropriate steps to reach the people who matter.

Who knows, though, what the future holds? The Coffee Shop is planning ahead - see
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=20342.0
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=20324.0
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=20187.0
and whilst I am not pre-determining any outcome, it's quite possible that we take the exceptional route we took with the GW (Great Western) Franchise consultation and actively make other submissions.  Other doors may be available for us to open too based on these plans.

You'll note at the top of this thread, we come back (again) to the newcomer's questions "Who do I ask" and "How do I find out". Added to that are "How do I make my questions / inputs effective", "How do I get a result" and "How do I find others who might know" and I see a distinct place for the more technical end of the forum, and perhaps a mentoring/training wing.


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page