Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:34:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How to further improve the Cotswold Line  (Read 10021 times)
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« on: September 14, 2018, 13:00:29 »

I've spent a bit of time thinking about how further improvements could be made to the North Cotswold Line as we know the existing infrastructure is nearing capacity at certain times of the day. 

The North Cotswold Line was partially redoubled in 2011 as part of a plan to improve train punctuality along the route.  This also facilitated improvements to the number of trains that could operate and reduced journey times for some trains.  However, the line is now operating close to its capacity.  Having single track sections of almost ten miles each at either end really affects the number of trains that can be pathed, and, whilst much better than before 2011, it can still take a frustratingly long time to recover the service after there has been a delay.  With the added factors of large levels of growth, especially at the eastern end, and a new station at Worcestershire Parkway opening next year which will further constrain available paths at the western end, there is now a need to think about further enhancements.

The attached document is intended to suggest ways of further improving the Cotswold Line route allowing for more trains to operate, speedier recovery from disruption and minor improvements to journey times over and above what might be possible by the new IET (Intercity Express Train) trains coming on stream.

It concentrates on keeping costs down as much as practically possible, by wherever possible using existing signalling and minimising the amount of new infrastructure required such as station platforms and footbridges.

The end result means the headway between trains as a result of the current signalling is roughly halved on key sections of the route, reducing section lengths to allow headways of 8 minutes for the common station calling patterns of trains.  This will allow more trains to be pathed (generally an extra train each hour in each direction could be accommodated), and reduce reactionary delays at times when no more trains than currently operate are required.

IT IS JUST A SUGGESTION.  You could argue that the whole line could be redoubled, all the signal boxed closed and transferred to the TVSC» (Thames Valley Signalling Centre - about) at Didcot or ROC (Rail Operating Centre - a centralised location for railway signalling and train control operations for a specific route or region) at Rugby.  That would have obvious cost implications such as the need to rebuild Finstock station and add another platform as well as adding a platform at Combe within a tricky engineering location.  Another option would be to undertake the track layout changes I’ve suggested, but take the opportunity to re-signal the route at the same time – that would have implications on the cost, but would probably save money over time.  Other more sensible signalling solutions may exist to the ones I suggest.

We have a number of forum users who have a vested interest in the line, and it would be interesting to hear their views of my ideas.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2018, 15:00:50 »

Good work, and pretty much includes all the items identified by NR» (Network Rail - home page).

As for including all items with a significant cost, you forgot the pedestrian overbridge that would be required at Pershore with a second platform. Eye watering figure.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2018, 17:26:37 »

Thanks, Chris.

Yes, new platforms nowadays come with a disproportionate footbridge cost as well usually.  The same would apply at Hanborough.  However the same number of rebuilt footbridges were required in 2011 at Honeybourne and Charlbury and that scheme got the green light of course.

You could look into ending the double track just short of the stations and just keep the one platform, though that would not give you anywhere near as much of a decrease in headways.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2018, 17:46:42 »

Hanborough additional platform is included in a formative scheme around additional park/ride facilities for Oxford. To include double-tracking as far as Hanborough.

There also exists a Cotswold Line Task Force made up of many interested parties able to source funding for projects such as these. Meeting regularly
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2018, 00:17:06 »

Let's hope those meeting come to something.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2018, 13:27:12 »

Yes II, some good work there.  I'm away from home for the next few weeks, so will have a better look at your signalling proposals when I return.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2018, 14:34:01 »

Yes II, some good work there.  I'm away from home for the next few weeks, so will have a better look at your signalling proposals when I return.

I've tried to keep them to what I think should be achievable - very few alterations at the manual signalboxes and most new stuff located either at Didcot TVSC» (Thames Valley Signalling Centre - about) or Evesham (which would probably need an extended/new panel).  I would certainly appreciate your more knowledgeable signalling observations though.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page