Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:12 Reading to Bedwyn
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 04:44:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ORR Report into May 2018 GTR and Northern Timetable Failure  (Read 1976 times)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« on: September 20, 2018, 02:16:34 »

Oh dear..... http://orr.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/39042/inquiry-into-may-2018-timetable-disruption-september-2018-findings.pdf
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2018, 06:59:55 »


An early summary / review from About Manchester

Quote
The summer railway chaos which resulted in hundreds of trains being cancelled and frustrated commuters left waiting for trains that never arrived across the North of England has concluded that the main reason for the failures was that nobody took charge.

The three-month Inquiry has found that Network Rail, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR), Northern, the Department for Transport (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)), and the Office of Rail and Road (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)) all made mistakes, which contributed to the collapse of services, particularly on the GTR and Northern routes.

The Inquiry found problems caused by delays to completing the North West Electrification Programmw were worsened by Network Rail, which wrongly believed it could make up the time.

The Inquiry has determined that during the planning stages the industry placed engineering and planning concerns ahead of serving its passengers, and that was made worse by the poor information train operators provided when disruption happened.

A key issue, found by the Inquiry, is that there is an apparent gap in industry responsibility and accountability for managing systemic risks, and that needs to change.

The System Operator (SO) function within Network Rail  was in the best position to understand and manage the risks, but did not take sufficient action, especially in the critical period of autumn 2017.

Events and decisions taken before January meant it was “probably unavoidable” that the launch would fail, according to the report. If there was a final go/no-go decision point it was in autumn 2017.

Neither GTR nor Northern were properly aware of or prepared for the problems in delivering the timetable and they did not do enough to provide accurate information to passengers when disruption occurred.

Article continues
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2018, 07:41:29 »

I don't think anyone will be surprised by the findings of this report that blames everyone so no one gets the blame for the shambolic launch of the new GTR and Northern timetables. No one will take responsibility so no one will resign. Make you wonder why they bother with these reports that state the obvious every time. It won't compensate the many hours of lost time and fustration borne out by the rail industrie's long suffering passengers.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2018, 09:10:42 »

One important finding not being generally reported is that Grayling signed off a requirement for the Thameslink core service to drop from 20 to 18tph.....after NR» (Network Rail - home page) had agreed the 20tph service timetable. All had to be rewritten well after the timetable ought to have gone to bed.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2018, 15:41:23 »

From the Evening Standard

Quote
Chris Grayling admits he was wrong to believe rail bosses over timetable shake-up but 'won't resign'

Transport Secretary Chris Grayling has admitted he was wrong to accept assurances from rail industry bosses about the timetable shake-up that caused a meltdown in train services.

But he said he would not resign despite a damning report blaming lack of industry leadership for the chaos that engulfed much of the railways in May , and insisted: “My job is to get this sorted.”

In a round of media interviews, Mr Grayling conceded he did not do enough to scrutinise promises given by rail chiefs that the botched programme of timetable reform was on track.

“The whole situation was entirely unacceptable. We were clearly wrong to take on trust what the industry said to us, that it was going to be ready for the changes due in May,” he told Sky News.

“My conclusion is that we’ve got an industry today where decision-making is too fragmented, we need a more joined up industry, we need an industry that moves on from the model set up at the time of privatisation.”

It follows the release today of the re-port by regulator the Office of Rail and Road (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)). It said track owner Network Rail; train operators Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Northern; the Department for Transport and the ORR itself all made mistakes that contributed to the timetable disaster.

The programme, which involved changes to 46 per cent of train times, brought misery to tens of thousands of passengers. Over several weeks, GTR and Northern cancelled up to 470 and 310 scheduled trains respectively each weekday. The report concludes “nobody took charge”, even when it became clear the programme was in trouble months before it was due to come into effect.

In the wake of the report Mr Grayling announced a “root and branch” review of the structure of the railways.
 
He said the priority was  to “make sure this can never happen again” rather than to “point fingers”. The review will be led by former British Airways chief executive Keith Williams and will report next year, with recommendations starting to be implemented in 2020.

But Mr Grayling ruled out the “simple panacea” of renationalisation, a quarter of a century after British Rail was split up and privatised by John Major’s government. The Transport Secretary said: “It’s not about who owns the railways, it’s about how it works.”

TUC General Secretary Frances O’ Grady said: “There’s a clear problem of where responsibility lies when you have a patchwork of private companies running a national rail network. It would make it easier to avoid the chaos passengers have suffered if the railways were brought back into public ownership as a properly integrated network.”
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2018, 15:43:32 »

Grayling is lying. He knows full well that the TOCs (Train Operating Company) raised concerns with him well before implementation but he was keen in getting a 'transformation' under his belt.
Logged
welshman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 277


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2018, 16:27:59 »

Yet more "Failing Grayling".  Everywhere he's been - DWP, MoJ and now DoT - things have gone wrong on his watch and in his two previous offices were reversed by his successors.  But he appears to be Teflon-coated.

Quote
“The whole situation was entirely unacceptable. We were clearly wrong to take on trust what the industry said to us..."
.

"We"?  Surely he means "I".  "I didn't bother to look into it properly so it's not my fault it's gone wrong."  Not quite sure that computes.



Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2018, 16:35:43 »

Doesn't 'the industry' include the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) ...

The report is kind of interesting because those supporting nationalisation can point to the communication and fragmentation issue, whereas those that don't can point at the culpability of the nationalised parts of 'the railway industry' and the dead hand of the DfT on NR» (Network Rail - home page) finances and operations.
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2018, 20:56:56 »

Yet more "Failing Grayling".  Everywhere he's been - DWP, MoJ and now DoT - things have gone wrong on his watch and in his two previous offices were reversed by his successors.  But he appears to be Teflon-coated.
This is because he was May's campaign manager during the leadership election. This was something he didn't fail at, a!though given the current state of the nation you may have wished that he had, but I will leave that up to you decide. 😁
Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 501


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2018, 10:14:30 »

Doesn't 'the industry' include the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) ...

The report is kind of interesting because those supporting nationalisation can point to the communication and fragmentation issue, whereas those that don't can point at the culpability of the nationalised parts of 'the railway industry' and the dead hand of the DfT on NR» (Network Rail - home page) finances and operations.

I'd hope that any nationalisation would be based on having a public sector body but independent of the government. The DfT would have a lot less say and their responsibilities would pass to the new body. Maybe something like the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) setup that although subject to some whims of government is generally left alone at an operational level.
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1204


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2018, 12:52:38 »

And as a follow-up...: http://orr.gov.uk/news-and-media/press-releases/2018/rail-regulator-opens-investigation-into-gtr-and-northern-over-passenger-information

Quote
The Office of Rail and Road (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)) has today opened an investigation into whether Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Northern breached its requirements to do everything reasonably practicable to provide appropriate, accurate and timely information to passengers in the run-up to the May 2018 timetable and during the disruption that followed.

The action comes after the ORR’s timetable Inquiry last month identified concerns with information provided to passengers who use Northern and GTR’s Thameslink and Great Northern services.

The ORR is investigating whether GTR and Northern breached Condition 4 of their ‘Statement of National Regulatory Provisions’ which requires train companies to provide “appropriate, accurate and timely information to enable railway passengers and prospective passengers to plan and make their journeys with a reasonable degree of assurance, including when there is disruption.”
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page