Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
* How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 10:13:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Labour could renationalise railways in five years  (Read 6347 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2018, 17:25:17 »

I know that not everyone in this forum uses Twitter, but for those that do/are able to, here's an interesting debate/thread from "Rail" magazine


https://twitter.com/RAIL/status/1043886719844659201

(Click on the box with Nick Brown's name)

Perfectly highlights the mistakes of the past. Woodhead closure, Serpell Report and the close call for the Settle & Carlisle, which all came under Tory administration.

It's interesting to note from that twitter thread that there's plenty of voices who disagree with Nick Brown's sentiment.

The most pertinent response being:

"Why, and what what possible causal link would this have for the action of any future state-owned operator? Political will of a future government is not, and cannot be, determined by action in the past..."

21st century nationalisation doesn't have to mean repeating the mistakes of the past.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2018, 19:08:34 »

Whilst public finances are not directly comparable to a corner shop, IMHO (in my humble opinion) government spending financed from borrowing or by printing money should not be too excessive or inflation will result.

We do not want to end up like Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Argentina, and other workers paradises. All have suffered from rapid inflation.
It is an article of faith among the leaders of such countries that inflation is caused by wicked capitalist profiteers, and not by government policy.

Absolutely agree - though the question is always how much is too much.

However, the countries you quote though the economic crisis has had other probably more important factor factors such as corruption (Transparency International Publishes a Corruption Perception Index for 180 countries for 2017 it ranks Venezuela 169, Zimbabwe 157, though Argentina is only 85 - A high number means more Corrupt). So the argument about wicked capitalist profiteers may have some substance, though sometimes those saying such things may, paradoxically be the ones doing the profiteering!
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2018, 19:14:16 »

While it is true that a future government could run the railways under different policies, it will still be difficult to make radically different investment decisions unless it is willing and able to challenge the Treasury and the transport appraisal methods used to inform those decisions.  Transport appraisal is supposed to be objective, so is regarded as the Truth, rather than being a matter of policy, which is why it is very hard to change  it. However, a lot of the assumptions within appraisal,  such as how lives saved by safety improvements, or values of time savings, involve decisions that are not scientific truths but involve value judgements about society's priorities, and are therefore very political.  Appraisal is a very useful tool when comparing similar kinds of schemes, but should not be our master when deciding what sort of society we want to live in.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2018, 19:58:36 »

Whilst public finances are not directly comparable to a corner shop, IMHO (in my humble opinion) government spending financed from borrowing or by printing money should not be too excessive or inflation will result.

We do not want to end up like Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Argentina, and other workers paradises. All have suffered from rapid inflation.
It is an article of faith among the leaders of such countries that inflation is caused by wicked capitalist profiteers, and not by government policy.

Absolutely agree - though the question is always how much is too much.

However, the countries you quote though the economic crisis has had other probably more important factor factors such as corruption (Transparency International Publishes a Corruption Perception Index for 180 countries for 2017 it ranks Venezuela 169, Zimbabwe 157, though Argentina is only 85 - A high number means more Corrupt). So the argument about wicked capitalist profiteers may have some substance, though sometimes those saying such things may, paradoxically be the ones doing the profiteering!


......or in the case of Venezuela, as our esteemed Shadow Chancellor suggested, they just weren't socialist enough!  Roll Eyes
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: September 23, 2018, 21:48:28 »

While it is true that a future government could run the railways under different policies, it will still be difficult to make radically different investment decisions unless it is willing and able to challenge the Treasury and the transport appraisal methods used to inform those decisions.  Transport appraisal is supposed to be objective, so is regarded as the Truth, rather than being a matter of policy, which is why it is very hard to change  it. However, a lot of the assumptions within appraisal,  such as how lives saved by safety improvements, or values of time savings, involve decisions that are not scientific truths but involve value judgements about society's priorities, and are therefore very political.  Appraisal is a very useful tool when comparing similar kinds of schemes, but should not be our master when deciding what sort of society we want to live in.

Yes but that makes no difference whether it is private or public sector. They use the same assessment methods now. 
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 23, 2018, 21:52:06 »

......or in the case of Venezuela, as our esteemed Shadow Chancellor suggested, they just weren't socialist enough!  Roll Eyes

Yes that is what the headline in the Daily Express (I know such a reliable newspaper) said, but if you actually read the article its says something quite different

Quote
Mr McDonnell said: “All the objectives of Chavez, in terms of tackling inequality, investing in education, developing people’s skills, would have been successful if they had mobilised the oil resources to actually invest in the long term and work with private sectors as well.

“I think in Venezuela they took a wrong turn, a not particularly effective path, not a socialist path.

"There are lessons to be learned on the mistakes all around."

Still it might not have sold as many papers if they had put that as a headline. And if they had been seen to suggest that John Macdonell was anything other than the personification of evil then would have lost their whole readership. 


Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: September 23, 2018, 23:33:27 »

They are preaching to the converted though, so it's very easy to fool them.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2018, 07:57:08 »

......or in the case of Venezuela, as our esteemed Shadow Chancellor suggested, they just weren't socialist enough!  Roll Eyes

Yes that is what the headline in the Daily Express (I know such a reliable newspaper) said, but if you actually read the article its says something quite different

Quote
Mr McDonnell said: “All the objectives of Chavez, in terms of tackling inequality, investing in education, developing people’s skills, would have been successful if they had mobilised the oil resources to actually invest in the long term and work with private sectors as well.

“I think in Venezuela they took a wrong turn, a not particularly effective path, not a socialist path.

"There are lessons to be learned on the mistakes all around."

Still it might not have sold as many papers if they had put that as a headline. And if they had been seen to suggest that John Macdonell was anything other than the personification of evil then would have lost their whole readership. 




Thanks for that - I'm sure it wasn't (both of your) intentions to come over as quite so patronising or to make assumptions about people based on their opinions/choice of newspaper, I know it's (depressingly) the "go to" argument for certain congregations these days however I don't read the Express. I do follow a range of media and I'm able to make up my own mind.

I've seen McDonnell's comments interpreted in the same way elsewhere (you will note my use of the word "suggested") and I interpreted his speech at Davos in the same way - that Chavez wasn't "socialist enough" as he didn't sufficiently institutionalise or embed what he was doing for the long term, and instead sustained short term populist policies & used the oil reserves as a piggy bank. Different interpretations are available elsewhere.

Ultimately of course, the money ran out. It was good (for some) while it lasted - Not uncommon in these scenarios. He'd probably have liked your corner shop analogy. . I'm sure the closed factories, & the empty clinics and schools are a great comfort to those poor souls who are now eating their pets.

I don't think that too many people regard McDonnell as the "personification of evil", that's rather melodramatic .most people are more sophisticated than you give them credit for, they understand nuance, and their opinions will vary along the scale.

I don't think he's "evil". He's an idealogue. That's not evil, just naive. That's in the economic sense of course, he does/has had a somewhat problematic attitude to terrorism, but that's par for the course in the Labour leadership these days, and not for here.

However I'm one of those people who trusts and respects others to have the intelligence to weigh up differing points of view and make up their own minds, rather than label them based on their choice of media.

The great thing about opinions of course is that everyone can have one!  Smiley

Have a great week.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2018, 12:00:11 »


Have a great week.


Just the other day I came across the phrase 'mic drop' - literally meaning 'to drop the microphone'. Apparently it's something that 'rappers', a kind of modern musician, do when they have performed a piece so perfectly that the microphone will no longer be necessary because all that is to be said on the subject has been said.

Sorry if this seems a bit ad hom, but "Have a great week" does sound a bit like a dropping the mic.

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2018, 16:32:34 »


Have a great week.


Just the other day I came across the phrase 'mic drop' - literally meaning 'to drop the microphone'. Apparently it's something that 'rappers', a kind of modern musician, do when they have performed a piece so perfectly that the microphone will no longer be necessary because all that is to be said on the subject has been said.

Sorry if this seems a bit ad hom, but "Have a great week" does sound a bit like a dropping the mic.



I'm afraid I don't have a clue what you're talking about, but next time I'm in da 'hood with my homies I will ask them if they know any MCs who can enlighten me.............before the 5-0 turn up and we scatter, naturally.

(...............if it's singing you're referring to, I can assure you that most who have heard my efforts would be urging me to "drop the microphone", even before I pick it up)  Smiley
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page