Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 29 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:49:00 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[64] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[59] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[58] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[52] Return of the BRUTE?
[36] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Does rail travel actually matter (stupid question day)  (Read 2380 times)
WelshBluebird
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 158


View Profile Email
« on: September 28, 2018, 14:40:33 »

Somewhat spurred on by grahame's postings, I'm making a couple, one now and probably one or two later.
Does rail travel actually matter in the grand scheme of things?

Obviously those of us here are either rail enthusiasts, or depend on the railways for travel, or both.
But for the majority of the public, does it really matter? Certainly most people I know are happy to drive most places and get taxis or walk when drinking etc. London is the main exception, but even then certainly at least some of my London based friends rely on their cars more than the railways.

Certainly I think those of us who do rely on rail tend to easily forget that most people don't, and you could rip up the railways and you wouldn't hear any argument from a large percentage of the British population. Obviously I don't want that to happen, but I think it is helpful if we put it all in prospective a bit sometimes!
« Last Edit: September 28, 2018, 15:20:26 by WelshBluebird » Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2018, 15:02:01 »

Rail does matter.

It shouldn't be seen as an alternative to the private car. Many can't or don't drive.

It's not a black and white issue between train and car. Rail is part of a transport system, public and private. That system should be balanced, but should also encourage public over private wherever possible. The societal benefits are important. Rail is the safest surface transport by far. Rail is far more environmentally friendly.

Does rail matter to many? Maybe not. But the answer should not be to dismiss rail. The answer should be to make it more attractive.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2018, 15:14:57 »

The societal benefits are important.
This. It's not just a question of getting people and things from one place to another, rail (and roads, air, even waterways) exist as part of everything else. Like an ecosystem, where removing one thing (or introducing a new one, or radically altering the proportions) has unpredictable consequences on things which don't seem to be connected.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2018, 15:37:15 »

Its a capacity issue.

I am not sure how else you could get the mass movement of people in and out of big cities like London every day. You would have to clear huge swathes of the suburbs to provide roads even if you used buses. The car was the alternative then it would be even larger and you would also have to clar huge swathes of the city centre to build car parks. 

I think this image says it all:



Further information at: https://www.cycling-embassy.org.uk/dictionary/capacity
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2018, 15:59:31 »

Under most circumstances, trains use much less fuel per passenger than private cars.
As fossil fuels deplete and therefore become more expensive, economy in fuel use will become ever more important.

Electric cars help to an extent with concerns about the price and availability of oil derived fuels, but do still need fuel or renewable energy to produce the electricity.
With a growing population there wont be the road space or parking spaces for cars for everyone.

Roads also kill a couple of thousand people a year at considerable cost to society. Trains are much safer.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2018, 16:19:13 »

London would be a very different place without its dense web of railways. I heard somewhere that a tube line has the same capacity as a twelve-lane motorway; to accommodate this the metropolis would have  become a very different place. In LA, with its generous network of freeways the average driver spends 102 hours/year stuck in congestion, whereas in London it's 74 hours/year - and in London, as long as you are able-bodied, you have other choices.

Most railways outside London, particularly post-Beeching, seem organised around the principle that ultimately everyone wants to get to London. This is changing: East-West Rail for example, but the progress is glacial. Part of the problem seems to be that rail (outside London, where to a carrot-cruncher like me it seems the question is not 'shall we build the line' but 'should we gold-plate the ticket machines') is seen as expensive, and this is seen as a Bad Thing. It isn't. Rail is meant to be expensive; that's the point. A rail link shows that a place is to be taken seriously, that it is worth investing in. Rail is quality. In a small town, a substantial well-maintained railway station is says more about a place than the most expensive advertising campaign. And for a decent-sized city, a proper metro system does the same.

Is rail essential? No, we could get by without it. But our quality of life would be diminished, and our economy would be damaged.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2018, 22:38:08 »

I'm not so sure Red Squirrel, "getting by" might not be the case for many.

There are other towns and cities that would suffer if their rail services were severed - look at the numbers of passengers arriving and departing from Reading Station every year. Birmingham and Manchester would also struggle. Guildford has quite a few inward commuters too.

The places from which people commute into the main centres would also suffer, too.

Our rail infrastructure, however much it could improve it's passenger experience, is an important part of our infrastructure. Look at all the minerals on the long stone trains that operate in our part of the world, or the long container trains. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page