Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
 today - Digital Railway - Swindon
today - Owl Auction - Bath
tomorrow - Friends of Bridgwater Station
tomorrow - TW NorthWest / Liverpool
22/10/2018 - ACoRP board nominations close
29/10/2018 - Avocet line AGM
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
October 17, 2018, 06:09:27 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[128] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[96] Four track for Filton Bank - ongoing discussion
[53] Bristol's Temple Gate layout change planned in 21m revamp
[44] Missing - a strategy for buses?
[40] IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent pe...
[38] Smoking and wee-ing at gated interchanges
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Government Railway Review 2018  (Read 192 times)
SandTEngineer
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2330


In a Linemans Hut in the far Southwest


View Profile
« on: October 12, 2018, 12:07:04 pm »

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/rail-review
Logged

Out of this nettle, Danger, we pluck this flower, Safety.
[Henry IV, Part 1, Act 2, Scene 3]
Red Squirrel
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2133


The first town plan. An idea that had legs.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2018, 12:33:03 pm »

Quote
Network Rail, which represents a third (38%) of the industry (based on spend), is nationalised. It is also responsible for over half (54%) of the daily disruption.

Quote
...the difficulties with the introduction of the new timetable over the summer and the problems we are experiencing with many major investment projects has convinced me that evolution is no longer enough.

Keith Williams should have a fairly clear idea of what Grayling would like his report to say. I'm guessing he'll recommend splitting NR into four or five regions, covering (at a guess) the West, the South, the North-East, the Midlands and Scotland, possibly handing control of them to the operating companies. As a concept that has a familiar ring to it somehow; maybe other readers out there with a better knowledge than mine of railway history can tell me if that sort of thing has ever been tried before?
Logged

Sir. Does this mean that Ann-Margret's not coming?
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4775


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2018, 12:54:12 pm »

Is yet another review going to make any difference I ask myself? Until the Dft can learn to let go of running the railways then nothing will change.
Logged
RA
Transport Scholar
Full Member
******
Posts: 97


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2018, 12:54:34 pm »

In the days of sectorisation at the end of BR, the stations, track and signalling came under the remit of the main operator in that area; for example Intercity, Regional Railways, Trainload Freight, etc. Liskeard signal box has a Regional Railways sign still attached to it as a legacy from this time.

The separation of wheel and rail came at privatisation. The sectors were split down to their constituent Train Operating Units (TOU) such as Regional Railways South Wales & West and Intercity Great Western in preparation for transferring to the private sector as franchises. (These two examples became South Wales & West Railway and Great Western Trains as private sector operators.) The infrastructure side was taken away from the TOUs and amalgamated to form a private national infrastructure operator, Railtrack.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22086



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2018, 01:49:37 pm »

Is yet another review going to make any difference I ask myself? Until the Dft can learn to let go of running the railways then nothing will change.

We can keep reviewing until the sea touches the sky and electrification extends to Looe ... progress depends on implementation of the outcome of the review ...

At times, reviews seem a cheap way of acknowledging something that needs dealing with, without the full expense of actually dealing with it.  A way of helping the resident and voter realise that the government in aware of their concerns and desires. But yet reviews are necessary in manageable quantities to help ensure that expenditure that is forthcoming is properly spent and in a co-ordinated manner rather that in a way that undoes other (government) spending.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
Red Squirrel
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2133


The first town plan. An idea that had legs.


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2018, 03:08:06 pm »


We can keep reviewing until the sea touches the sky and electrification extends to Looe ... progress depends on implementation of the outcome of the review ...


If you'll forgive me, grahame, I've extended your short poem:

We can keep reviewing til sea touch sky
And the wires extend to Looe
Progress depends on the implementation
Of the outcome of the review
For who are we but passengers
On a ride of Grayling's bidding
If we hope things will get better soon
It's only ourselves we are kidding
Logged

Sir. Does this mean that Ann-Margret's not coming?
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants