Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
* How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 10:01:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Getting Electrification Right  (Read 1972 times)
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 749


View Profile
« on: October 18, 2018, 00:26:57 »

I haven't seen this mentioned before, but this article seems well worth the time to read (including the comments)

https://www.railengineer.uk/2018/06/04/getting-electrification-right/

Quote
At current prices (as are all prices in this article), the GWML (Great Western Main Line) programme was to cost £1.28 billion. It is now likely to cost £3.17 billion or £4 million per single track kilometre (stk)...

...benchmarking includes the electrification of 1,362 stk in Denmark over a twelve-year period and in Germany, the 225 stk Ulm to Lindau electrification, both of which are costing circa £1 million/stk. It would seem that these relatively low costs are the result of a steady rolling programme.

...acknowledged that the GWML electrification structures and their foundations had been over-engineered and felt that one reason for this was that contracts had encouraged a risk-averse design approach

...the Scottish government has had a consistent policy and programme of electrification since it took over the responsibility for Scotland’s railways from the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) in 2005

...There was also a strong view of the value of a rolling electrification programme to retain knowledge and skills.

...t was clear ... that Scottish electrification generally costs less than in England. For example, the electrification element of the 2010 Airdrie to Bathgate project was well under £1.5 million/stk


...The two factors that seem to make a big difference are that Scottish electrification is a relatively small rolling programme and that Transport Scotland is a strong, informed client.


Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2018, 05:37:57 »

That is a very interesting read indeed.   What struck me:

Quote

Now - overlooking the use of a histogram for one country and a line for the other - this seems to show it all about the stop-go nature of electrification in the UK (United Kingdom) and the continuous program nature in Germany ...
« Last Edit: October 18, 2018, 05:54:00 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2018, 06:31:39 »

But are these £ per stk figures comparable?  Continental railways have a very large structure gauge, does this reduce the cost of rebuilding structures for electrification?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2018, 08:52:51 »

Not certain that I can agree that the current GWR (Great Western Railway) electrification structures are "over engineered" Having suffered regularly from the failed East coast electrification "no trains in windy weather" I consider that very substantial structures are preferable.
In the last few days we have seen a substantial failure of low quality electrification near Paddington, whilst a defective train caused this, the consequences would have been less serious with more substantial construction.

Even allowing for the substantial structures, the cost of the GWR electrification still seems very excessive.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2018, 09:03:37 »

Very striking graph, that!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2018, 09:20:04 »

At first glance, I thought it was a picture of the Dubai skyline.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2018, 10:30:42 »

But are these £ per stk figures comparable?  Continental railways have a very large structure gauge, does this reduce the cost of rebuilding structures for electrification?
Not necessarily.  The fact that the structure gauge is generally bigger, to allow for the bigger rolling stock, doesn’t logically mean the structures originally included additional future electrification clearance.  They will still need the extra height.

Even when routes in this country have been upgraded from W6 to W12 for high containers it hasn’t automatically provided for wiring as well, because W12 is only very slightly higher than W6 - it’s more about opening out the corners. 

Paul
Logged
sikejsudjek3
Full Member
***
Posts: 50


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2018, 15:25:33 »

The trouble here is the stop start nature of the work. We've lost expertise during the non electrification years. Then a whole load of upgrades and repairs are added to the cost - which would have been needed to be done at some point anyway. Then we have to pay out substantial compensation to the many different privatised operators when the track is closed for works, or services are cancelled. Its a mess of a system - which is costly to maintain largely because of the fragmented structure. So it isn't just that our electrification costs a lot - there are other factors that add to the overall costs.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2018, 18:46:09 »

There is nothing new in the concept of progressive electrification; British Railways held this view for 25kV electrification form the mid 1950's which at the time also included the expansion of the third rail system,even the diesel electric locomotives were part of this master plan.


The WCML (West Coast Main Line) electrification was meant to roll on to the Midland Mainline and East Coast, I saw the BR (British Rail(ways)) map produced in the mind 1970's in the Electrification HQ (Headquarters) in Marylebone in 1990; it showed the GWML (Great Western Main Line) being completed to Bristol, Taunton and Swansea by 2000.


The show stopper has always been political decisions by HMG
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2018, 22:05:46 »

The problem is not just "political" - it's more a cultural problem in the decision making levels of our society. After all, there was a sustained period of electrification under Mrs Thatcher, who was always characterised as anti-railway - although it might be because BR (British Rail(ways)) divested itself of Sealink, hotels etc it had money to spend. What we need is an overall recognition that steady investment in infrastructure maintenance and improvement is better than feast and famine - and that has to become ingrained at HM Treasury, so that when the latest transient occupant of no 11 Downing Street arrives, he (or she) does not regard it an an optional add on if there's money to spare (or an election to be won), and is not encouraged to do so.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2018, 18:10:42 »

The problem is not just "political" - it's more a cultural problem in the decision making levels of our society. After all, there was a sustained period of electrification under Mrs Thatcher, who was always characterised as anti-railway - although it might be because BR (British Rail(ways)) divested itself of Sealink, hotels etc it had money to spend. What we need is an overall recognition that steady investment in infrastructure maintenance and improvement is better than feast and famine - and that has to become ingrained at HM Treasury, so that when the latest transient occupant of no 11 Downing Street arrives, he (or she) does not regard it an an optional add on if there's money to spare (or an election to be won), and is not encouraged to do so.

Its not just the railways that suffers the feast and famine,  Schools, NHS, roads, local authority services, Police ………………………..
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2018, 20:05:26 »

The problem is not just "political" - it's more a cultural problem in the decision making levels of our society. After all, there was a sustained period of electrification under Mrs Thatcher, who was always characterised as anti-railway - although it might be because BR (British Rail(ways)) divested itself of Sealink, hotels etc it had money to spend. What we need is an overall recognition that steady investment in infrastructure maintenance and improvement is better than feast and famine - and that has to become ingrained at HM Treasury, so that when the latest transient occupant of no 11 Downing Street arrives, he (or she) does not regard it an an optional add on if there's money to spare (or an election to be won), and is not encouraged to do so.

Its not just the railways that suffers the feast and famine,  Schools, NHS, roads, local authority services, Police ………………………..

You might think there must be a better way to run a country; I couldn't possibly comment.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2018, 16:46:42 »

There are actually 3 things that suffer feast and famine and are first to be axed, Maintenance, Training and Research.

It doesn't help that they all considered to be revenue  costs rather than investments so don't add to the bottom line.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page