Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:55 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:06:54 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: End of Automated Station Announcements?  (Read 1505 times)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« on: October 27, 2018, 22:50:07 »

From the Times:

Quote
Ding-dong: we’re sorry to announce that the infuriating platform announcement has been cancelled.

The transport secretary is about to pull the plug on automated announcements at rail stations because of concerns that they drive passengers up the wall. Chris Grayling has told train companies to employ more people to make announcements to ensure travellers are given accurate information. He said that widespread use of computer-driven PAs (Public Address) was leaving passengers frustrated and giving them little helpful information when something went wrong.

The minister’s action follows problems this summer when the introduction of new timetables backfired, with up to 800 trains a day cancelled in north and southeast England. An inquiry was told that many passengers were left in the dark with poor information issued via speakers and information screens.

Mr Grayling said that employing human announcers was needed to give passengers more up-to-date information such as the reason for a delay, when it would be resolved, alternative routes and how to claim compensation.

Speaking to The Times he said: “The automated announcements do nothing to show sympathy for inconvenienced passengers and often fail to provide vital information. That’s why I’d like to see, wherever possible, the return of a human voice at the other end of a microphone.

“Train operators are doing good work to harness tech solutions to provide passenger information, but they should make sure old fashioned customer service remains part of it.”

Robert Nisbet, of the Rail Delivery Group, which represents train operators and Network Rail, said: “Automated announcements take information from a number of sources to give the most precise information possible. In many stations operators can switch off or add to the automated system.”

Goodness me.  Is it the 1st April already? Tongue
Logged
CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2018, 23:14:39 »

From the Times:

Quote
Ding-dong: we’re sorry to announce that the infuriating platform announcement has been cancelled.

The transport secretary is about to pull the plug on automated announcements at rail stations because of concerns that they drive passengers up the wall. Chris Grayling has told train companies to employ more people to make announcements to ensure travellers are given accurate information. He said that widespread use of computer-driven PAs (Public Address) was leaving passengers frustrated and giving them little helpful information when something went wrong.

The minister’s action follows problems this summer when the introduction of new timetables backfired, with up to 800 trains a day cancelled in north and southeast England. An inquiry was told that many passengers were left in the dark with poor information issued via speakers and information screens.

Mr Grayling said that employing human announcers was needed to give passengers more up-to-date information such as the reason for a delay, when it would be resolved, alternative routes and how to claim compensation.

Speaking to The Times he said: “The automated announcements do nothing to show sympathy for inconvenienced passengers and often fail to provide vital information. That’s why I’d like to see, wherever possible, the return of a human voice at the other end of a microphone.

“Train operators are doing good work to harness tech solutions to provide passenger information, but they should make sure old fashioned customer service remains part of it.”

Robert Nisbet, of the Rail Delivery Group, which represents train operators and Network Rail, said: “Automated announcements take information from a number of sources to give the most precise information possible. In many stations operators can switch off or add to the automated system.”

Goodness me.  Is it the 1st April already? Tongue

They need a new voice that’s more relaxing and instead of “sorry” “apologies” give information i.e

“The 17:42 Great Western Railway service to Cheltenham Spa is currently expected to arrive 4 minutes behind schedule.”

Anything over 8 minutes then issue one apology. General announcements are announced every minute when the train is near.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2018, 07:58:04 »

Quote
Mr Grayling said that employing human announcers was needed to give passengers more up-to-date information such as the reason for a delay, when it would be resolved, alternative routes and how to claim compensation.

Speaking to The Times he said: “The automated announcements do nothing to show sympathy for inconvenienced passengers and often fail to provide vital information. That’s why I’d like to see, wherever possible, the return of a human voice at the other end of a microphone.

“Train operators are doing good work to harness tech solutions to provide passenger information, but they should make sure old fashioned customer service remains part of it.”

Who's going to pay for them  Grin

Automated announcement (and information board) overrides are most needed at times when things aren't running to plan - and those are the very times that staff are at their busiest anyway.

Suggestion ...

1. Reduce the repeated automated announcements to sensible level; I recall standing on Breich station last year - the only passenger waiting for a train, and being bombarded every few minutes. 

2. Reduce the need for out-of-ordinary announcements by sorting out the trains themselves to run to timetable, and of the correct length and with reservations shown in the right coaches

3. Reduce the number of "features" of the automated software that don't function properly / as well as even a knowledgable passenger can tell result in wrong or misleading information.

Journey on a brand new train the other week ... automated announcement tells us the train has just left Neath and the next station would be Port Talbot Parkway.   Train manager follows that up, with  humourous line, tellng is that the train has it wrong and we've actually just left Newport and the next station will be Bristol Parkway.  But, seriously, if my mobile phone can tell where I am through SatNav, why can't the rather more expensive train know where it is?

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2018, 08:47:06 »

Given that effective and useful customer information & communications are one of the railways weakest point, it'll be interesting to see how this develops
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2018, 08:55:30 »

I think we’d all be grateful if there were less automated announcements at stations. Fine when all is running smoothly but next to useless when things go wrong becoming most annoying. I think TOCs (Train Operating Company) have become far to over reliant on them when human input at times of disruption would be better for the passenger.

From personal experience they are usually very good at Bath Spa with resorting to human announcements at times of disruption to give passengers the latest info though often it’s not good news.
Logged
CMRail
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 400


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2018, 09:42:32 »

As spoken about before, all key stations on the GW (Great Western) network are to have these wireless microphones that the dispatcher/service delivery assistant will use.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 783


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2018, 12:53:14 »

Excellent idea. Digby & Sowton station currently has a regular 'For their own safety, passengers are reminded to stand behind the yellow line' announcement. Which might be considered OK if said station actually had a yellow line. But it doesn't. Pillocks.
Logged
want2workrail
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 18



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2018, 15:07:43 »

Excellent idea. Digby & Sowton station currently has a regular 'For their own safety, passengers are reminded to stand behind the yellow line' announcement. Which might be considered OK if said station actually had a yellow line. But it doesn't. Pillocks.

This problem also occurs at Blackwater too!
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2018, 19:40:23 »

Having just had a good old moan about some problems at Reading on another thread, there was one particularly irritating use of them when the refurbished station first reopened. This was "letting off" two announcements on nearby platforms almost simultaneously, so neither could be heard.

There is one announcer though at Reading, who when he is on duty goes the extra mile in trying to give helpful information. It does not sound like he was on duty today, and (presumably) his ability to do so depends on Control providing the information. At Guildford we seem to get helpful real human voices more often when there are problems, although not always.

Grahame's point about who will pay for them is well made. It does not seem that there are enough staff to cascade information out from Control, let alone announce to passengers. Or is it a case that the industry does not have the time/initiative/motivation to spend looking at how they might look at the way they do things to see if they could bridge the information gap? 

 
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2018, 21:29:10 »

2. Reduce the need for out-of-ordinary announcements by sorting out the trains themselves to run to timetable, and of the correct length and with reservations shown in the right coaches
Far too radical.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page