Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 29 Mar 2024
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:06:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[49] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[48] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[43] Return of the BRUTE?
[30] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8
  Print  
Author Topic: Dawlish closures - November 2018  (Read 20798 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7749



View Profile
« Reply #75 on: November 10, 2018, 08:11:30 »

Both Up and Down sleeper services cancelled.

What happens to the sleeper passengers in these circumstances? Do GWR (Great Western Railway) arrange road transport or do they put them in hotels overnight? (Or are they just abandoned and left to their own devices?)

The 21.03 to Plymouth finally left Paddington at 22.20 and was the last service out of Paddington to Taunton and beyond. It is however terminating at Exeter, so not much use to most Sleeper passengers.

So I guess a hotel in London or Reading? I know that GWR ask passengers with berths booked for their mobile numbers and I further believe they are all contacted. But who pays for the hotel?


Several passengers who arrived for the sleeper were booked into the Hilton at Paddington by GWR, and others were provided with road transport - only right and proper.


Earlier in the day customers were being assured that the sleeper would run, it was only much later that this changed and people were told not to travel, so offering them a bed for the night on a bench at Paddington or Reading wouldn't really have been an option...........if you see a taxi driver ordering an Aston Martin you will know where the money came from!
Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: November 10, 2018, 09:46:41 »

The myth that an alternative to Dawlish would result in the existing line being closed needs to be firmly quashed, as I see its reared its head again on social media. To my mind, its unthinkable that the towns and Bay resorts wouldn’t warrant a rail service, even if rationalised somewhat. And lets be honest, few High Speed service stop at Dawlish and Teignm outhitting or run through to Paignton anyway
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 533



View Profile Email
« Reply #77 on: November 10, 2018, 10:04:59 »

The myth that an alternative to Dawlish would result in the existing line being closed needs to be firmly quashed, as I see its reared its head again on social media. To my mind, its unthinkable that the towns and Bay resorts wouldn’t warrant a rail service, even if rationalised somewhat. And lets be honest, few High Speed service stop at Dawlish and Teignm outhitting or run through to Paignton anyway


I think the problem is; would they be so quick to repair any breach?

The plan I saw at Dawlish was to extend the sea wall further into the sea, but this only gives the sea something to smash at. I would put the track on stilts in the sea and the tide could pass underneath, would also remove the tunnels and leave the beaches relatively untouched.

I also think this will also have to be done on the Exe estuary.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7749



View Profile
« Reply #78 on: November 10, 2018, 10:06:12 »

The myth that an alternative to Dawlish would result in the existing line being closed needs to be firmly quashed, as I see its reared its head again on social media. To my mind, its unthinkable that the towns and Bay resorts wouldn’t warrant a rail service, even if rationalised somewhat. And lets be honest, few High Speed service stop at Dawlish and Teignm outhitting or run through to Paignton anyway


I think the problem is; would they be so quick to repair any breach?

The plan I saw at Dawlish was to extend the sea wall further into the sea, but this only gives the sea something to smash at. I would put the track on stilts in the sea and the tide could pass underneath, would also remove the tunnels and leave the beaches relatively untouched.

I also think this will also have to be done on the Exe estuary.


How much would that cost, and how much would the "avoiding route" cost?
Logged
1st fan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 402


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: November 10, 2018, 10:36:31 »

Both Up and Down sleeper services cancelled.

What happens to the sleeper passengers in these circumstances? Do GWR (Great Western Railway) arrange road transport or do they put them in hotels overnight? (Or are they just abandoned and left to their own devices?)

The 21.03 to Plymouth finally left Paddington at 22.20 and was the last service out of Paddington to Taunton and beyond. It is however terminating at Exeter, so not much use to most Sleeper passengers.

So I guess a hotel in London or Reading? I know that GWR ask passengers with berths booked for their mobile numbers and I further believe they are all contacted. But who pays for the hotel?


Several passengers who arrived for the sleeper were booked into the Hilton at Paddington by GWR, and others were provided with road transport - only right and proper.


Earlier in the day customers were being assured that the sleeper would run, it was only much later that this changed and people were told not to travel, so offering them a bed for the night on a bench at Paddington or Reading wouldn't really have been an option...........if you see a taxi driver ordering an Aston Martin you will know where the money came from!


When the sleeper didn't run for me (years ago) due to the line being washed out between Exeter and Tiverton FGW (First Great Western) were very good. They put on an HST (High Speed Train) from Penzance to Plymouth for all passengers and then road transport to Tiverton and then a train to Paddington. If you were a berth customer there was also the option of a hotel in Plymouth and continuing the journey by road/rail in the morning. They also refunded berth customers the cost of their tickets.
Logged
1st fan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 402


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: November 10, 2018, 10:39:52 »

The myth that an alternative to Dawlish would result in the existing line being closed needs to be firmly quashed, as I see its reared its head again on social media. To my mind, its unthinkable that the towns and Bay resorts wouldn’t warrant a rail service, even if rationalised somewhat. And lets be honest, few High Speed service stop at Dawlish and Teignm outhitting or run through to Paignton anyway

I think the problem is; would they be so quick to repair any breach?

The plan I saw at Dawlish was to extend the sea wall further into the sea, but this only gives the sea something to smash at. I would put the track on stilts in the sea and the tide could pass underneath, would also remove the tunnels and leave the beaches relatively untouched.

I also think this will also have to be done on the Exe estuary.

A better option might be a breakwater along the affected stretch reducing the power of the waves before they got to land.
Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: November 10, 2018, 10:57:57 »

The myth that an alternative to Dawlish would result in the existing line being closed needs to be firmly quashed, as I see its reared its head again on social media. To my mind, its unthinkable that the towns and Bay resorts wouldn’t warrant a rail service, even if rationalised somewhat. And lets be honest, few High Speed service stop at Dawlish and Teignm outhitting or run through to Paignton anyway

I think the problem is; would they be so quick to repair any breach?

The plan I saw at Dawlish was to extend the sea wall further into the sea, but this only gives the sea something to smash at. I would put the track on stilts in the sea and the tide could pass underneath, would also remove the tunnels and leave the beaches relatively untouched.

I also think this will also have to be done on the Exe estuary.

A better option might be a breakwater along the affected stretch reducing the power of the waves before they got to land.


Stilts sound dangerous given that the waves reduced a section of the existing wall to rubble.

Reopen Okehampton route and reduce Dawlish Warren to Newton Abbot to single track with a passing loop at Teignmouth. Put the single track on the existing Up Main and then remodel the sea wall using the space gained, with better drainage and if necessary a higher rampart
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #82 on: November 10, 2018, 10:58:40 »

DfT» (Department for Transport - about) need to look at the GWR (Great Western Railway) 1935 plan for an inland route. As I see it from Google maps a line could be constructed from a location near Powderham Castle and Estate to rejoin the current line to the east of the Devon Expressway for the run into Newton Abbot. From the satellite image such a route would mainly be through agricultural land. The current route would be retained for local services and Summer Saturdays holiday traffic and if weather closes the line in future local services could still be run Exeter - Dawlish Warren and Newton Abbot - Teignmouth with RRB (Rail Replacement Bus) between Dawlish Warren and Teignmouth.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #83 on: November 10, 2018, 11:15:04 »

A better option might be a breakwater along the affected stretch reducing the power of the waves before they got to land.

The problem isn't just the waves, but also the potential for the cliffs to collapse.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: November 10, 2018, 11:54:26 »

DfT» (Department for Transport - about) need to look at the GWR (Great Western Railway) 1935 plan for an inland route. As I see it from Google maps a line could be constructed from a location near Powderham Castle and Estate to rejoin the current line to the east of the Devon Expressway for the run into Newton Abbot. From the satellite image such a route would mainly be through agricultural land. The current route would be retained for local services and Summer Saturdays holiday traffic and if weather closes the line in future local services could still be run Exeter - Dawlish Warren and Newton Abbot - Teignmouth with RRB (Rail Replacement Bus) between Dawlish Warren and Teignmouth.

They don't need to do that they already spent money on a report looking at this and other routes.  Lets not waste money on more reports. Just read them and do something!
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #85 on: November 10, 2018, 13:49:21 »

Here is part of the original plan:



..and extracts from a magazine article freely available on the www:



I believe it was planned to have new stations on the proposed route for Dawlish and Teignmouth (at the back of both towns), so only Dawlish Warren would have been lost (if you could call that a loss Grin).
« Last Edit: November 10, 2018, 13:57:46 by SandTEngineer » Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #86 on: November 10, 2018, 14:54:36 »

Moving the line offshore around Dawlish has been previously discussed, with the general view that so doing would be too costly and disruptive.
Placing the railway on a solid sea wall seems a non starter due to the land locked lagoon that would be formed to landward.
Placing the line on a pier, under which the sea would pass freely sounds possible but hugely expensive.

I recently heard of an alternative proposal to move the line offshore, on a pier or bridge as above, but to partially offset the costly civil engineering works by building several large wind turbines as part of the pier or bridge.
Off shore wind turbines need large and costly foundations, but if the cost was shared between the railway and the electricity generating industry, might be more affordable.
The pier or bridge would be carry a double track railway and a public footpath. It could become an attraction in its own right, for sightseeing and angling.
The footway would not be open to road vehicles normally, but could be used thus in case of emergency, and for access to maintain the  structure and the wind turbines.

This suggestion was from a senior figure in the wind power industry, so not exactly independent. Still perhaps worth considering.

Edit to add, I have their permission to publish this suggestion, but NOT to give their name or other details. I can confirm that I have no connection with them beyond casual friendship.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2018, 16:05:21 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: November 10, 2018, 19:38:49 »

This interesting link turned up on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum: http://www.rail.co.uk/rail-news/2014/dawlish-rail-disruption/

Quote
When was it closed?
Winter 1846 – 3 days

Winter 1852/53 – 2 blockages of 7 and 3 days respectively)

Feb 1855 – blockage of 12 days continuously (longest in period 1846 – 1986)

Oct 1859 – blockage for 3 days

Jan – Feb 1869 – blockage for 5 days

Winter 1872/73 – 4 blockages of 1 day, 3 days, 3 days and 1 day respectively

Nov 1908 – damage to walkway only

March 1923 – blockage of 3 days

Jan 1930 – blockage of 5 days

Feb 1936 – blockage of 3 days

March 1962 – ballast wash outs, services suspended for several hours, then Single Line Working (SLW) was instituted over the Up line

February 1974 – major damage to down platform at Dawlish station, line completely closed for 2 hours, then up line reopened

Feb/March 1986 – blocked 26/02/86 to 03/3/86 – serious damage to wall at Smugglers Cove. The Up line (eastbound) was still useable for engineers trains (and a few freight services on 1 March only). SLW commenced on 03/3/86 with the Down Main Line (Westbound) remaining shut until reopened on 11/3/86

In the last 20 years, January 1996 saw a major incident when the wall was damaged between Dawlish and Dawlish Warren at Rockstone with further severe damage at Sprey Point. Here, the down line (nearest the sea) was suspended over a washed out void, which reached to sleeper ends of Up line. Both lines closed several days were closed for about a week.

The Winter of 2000/2001 following prolonged heavy rain, saw many cliff falls and again Sprey Point featured with a big fall with the line closed for a few days and some more damage to the sea wall. Railtrack then Network Rail then carried out some major cliff stabilisation work in the mid-2000s at a cost of around £15 million.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: November 10, 2018, 23:38:37 »

The governments of 1846, 1852/3, 1855, 1859, 1869, 1872/3, 1923, 1931, 1936, 1986, 1996, and 2000/1 should be ashamed.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: November 10, 2018, 23:50:15 »

Presumably that list is only of closures for repair. "Ordinary" interruptions of train services due to too much sea (in the wrong place) must have frequent throughout, though perhaps without today's formal announcement in advance, and more of a try it and see if the fire gets put out attitude.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page