Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:55 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:13:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[80] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[59] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[44] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[34] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[32] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Levelling out resources  (Read 4526 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: March 21, 2007, 17:35:25 »

40 years ago, the railways had a generous inventory of rolling stock, with much of it brought out of sidings on high days and holidays to provide excursion trains, holiday specials and transport to and from soccer matches.  But times have changed and the excess inventory no longer exists; after all, it makes little economic sense to keep an increasingly expensive resource idle most of the time. In recent years, the "rub" point when all stock has been in use has been the Monday to Friday peak commuter time.

Even today, the economics of maintaining a train which is only busy from (say) Keynsham to Bristol in the morning and then back in the evening "on the fleet" is pretty poor.  And so there's a logic in trying to "persuade" travellers to move their journeys to less busy times to even out demand - in otehr words so that the same number of passengers can be carried with fewer resources.

One of the features of the timetable introduced last December was a reduction of peak hour services to a level that's much more similar to the level that runs during the day.  "We miscalculated" admit some of the more open managers at First.  Yes - you did.  But I find myself wondering if the miscalculation wasn't so much in the level of services that the traveller wanted, but rather in the level of annoyance the attempt to change the traveller's commuting habits would generate.

In other words, did First know exactly what they were doing in December, but they expected that the public would accept it once the initial shock had worn off.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
john
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2007, 12:51:03 »

First did indeed know EXACTLY what it was doing, indeed stock allocated to Bristol peak services was planned to operate at 160% capacity from December. That figure was around nearly 12 months ago, it wasnt a suprise when December TT change created chaos, the suprise was passenger reaction! Is it going to get better? Well 12 class 158s to go in May, and the class 180 Adelante fleet to go in December, the battle is far from over...
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2007, 17:05:29 »

Here is a take on this from a knowledgeable contact (written in February , so make allowances for subsequent events) :

"I'm looking at the RAIL article mentioned in your link. I think I've just about made sense of it....

For the HST (High Speed Train)'s it says 348 vehicles at the start of the franchise in April 2006 and (104+104+189) = 397 in January 2008. i.e. a gain of 49 vehicles. By Jan 2008 the Adelantes will have gone (a loss of 70 vehicles) so that makes the running total of vehicle changes that are still to happen 49-70 = -21.

The article claims that the 166 fleet was meant to be 57 vehicles (19 3-car units) from June 2006. This hasn't happened (yet?) and the fleet size is still 63 vehicles (21 3-car units). Assuming this is going to happen at some point gives a running total of -27.

165's and 143's stay the same.

The reduction in the 150 fleet from 50 to 34 has already happened in Dec 2006 when 8 units (16 vehicles) transferred to Arriva. Running total still -27.

In Dec 2006 the 153 fleet reduced from 15 to 11 when 4 units were stored at Eastleigh. The article claims a fleet size of 8 in Jan 2008 so if it happens the running total would be -30.

Making sense of the 158's is tricky as a lot of unit swaps have happened since April 2006. e.g. the arrival of the ex-Transpennine units and transfer away of some former Central Trains units. At the moment the 158 fleet comprises:
 
Porterbrook owned: 19 2-car units, 1 3-car unit = 41 vehicles.

Angel owned: 15 2-car units = 30 vehicles.

Total fleet size is currently 41+30 = 71 vehicles. This is higher than either set of figures quoted in RAIL because the Transpennine units have arrived but haven't yet displaced a similar number of Angel owned units due to the recent availability problems.

I think there is still one more Porterbrook unit to come from Transpennine (158771). It was due last year but got damaged in a shunting accident at Neville Hill depot in Leeds so hasn't made the move yet.

Assuming it arrives and all of the Angel 158's go off lease the fleet size would be 20 2-car units and 1 3-car unit = 43 vehicles. Which is what the RAIL article says for Jan 2008. The loss of the 30 Angel vehicles plus the addition of 158771 would make the running total -58.

So in a worst case scenario there could still be a loss of 58 vehicles from the fleet."
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2007, 23:17:36 »

I went on 771 last night & thought to myself I have not seen it before, there is no number by the cab on the 52 end, so they must have replaced the windscreen
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 589


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2007, 13:54:07 »

FGW (First Great Western)'s problem of having insufficient capacity for the 07:30-9:00 and 16:30-18:00 peak time slots can be partially addressed by a better fair structure, and running extra services outside of this time slot.

If First offered discounted off-peak season tickets, this could help over crowding by encouraging some passengers to start work early of late.

Not all passengers can work flexible hours, but enough can to operate a better off peak service.

Finally, if you cut back services, as FGW/Dft have done, you lose some traffic and make your existing services busier. This is what has happened.




Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page