Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:35 23 Apr 2024
- Sunak to pledge £500m more to support Ukraine
- Ten dead after Malaysia navy helicopters collide
- Rail strikes announced for May Bank Holiday week
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 23rd Apr

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 23, 2024, 10:54:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[130] "Mayflower"
[100] You see all sorts on the bus.
[71] Where have I been?
[34] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[28] "We can’t get from A to B in Britain and it might just be th...
[22] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Grand Northern Woodhead Proposal  (Read 2085 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: November 22, 2018, 08:43:29 »

Hundreds of people have backed a petition to reopen the Woodhead railway route between Sheffield and Manchester.

A company called Grand Northern wants to revive the Woodhead tunnel route for freight and passenger services, but faces possible scuppering from National Grid plans to replace pylons with underground cables alongside the route.

Sheffield Telegraph link
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2274


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2018, 10:47:31 »

Very interesting, good luck to them. Some irony there from the issue with the National Grid should Grand Northern wish to electrify the line.



Edit: Corrected spellchecker error.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2018, 11:52:08 by johnneyw » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7166


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2018, 10:51:13 »

The real issue with grid cables is this:
Quote
One major obstacle is that since the line ceased operating in 1981, the main tunnel has been used by National Grid to carry electric cables under the Peak District.

Those cables would need replacing, and given that pylons would be rejected here that would be costly.
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1248



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2018, 11:11:15 »

I thought the electricity cables ran through one of the old single-track tunnels.  There are three bores in total.
Logged
Western Enterprise
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 134


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2018, 11:14:16 »

3 Bores yes but the old ones were in decay, due mainly to the sulphuric atmosphere imparted by steam hauling heavy trains up hill.
I believe that one has collapsed already....
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2018, 11:18:32 »

The other major problem it seems to me is what station do you use in Sheffield? Victoria or  reverse and go into Midland or even both.

Edited to add recognised at end of article although it implies there is no link in Sheffield.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2018, 11:31:42 by eightf48544 » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7166


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2018, 11:47:45 »

I thought the electricity cables ran through one of the old single-track tunnels.  There are three bores in total.

After several bouts of agitation and a bit of shouting over many years, new cables were installed in the 1953 tunnel during 2008-2012. If you look at Dunford Bridge on Google Earth you can see the works site at that portal in the historical imagery - there doesn't seem to be much now to show it.
Quote
At the time of their completion in 1845, the two Victorian tunnels were among the world's longest railway tunnels. British Rail added a third tunnel in 1953. The Victorian tunnels were acquired by the CEGB in the 1960s to carry the trans-Pennine 400-kV electricity link below ground, rather than over the moors of the Peak District National Park.

It is not possible to install new electricity cables alongside the existing cables in the Victorian tunnels for two reasons:

    Firstly, to ensure continued safe and secure electricity supplies for Greater Manchester, the existing cables need to remain in service while new cables are installed. Because of the confined space, there is not enough room to carry out major engineering works to install new cables in the tunnels alongside the existing "live" 400-kV cables.
    Secondly, despite a great deal of maintenance work over the years, the condition of the Victorian tunnels has continued to deteriorate and they would require considerable civil engineering works at substantial additional cost to be made safe for long-term use for any purpose.

Therefore the replacement cable circuits will be installed in the third, more modern, Woodhead Tunnel. This tunnel was closed in 1982 and was bought by National Grid in the early 1990s with this purpose in mind. This project forms part of National Grid’s ongoing national investment program and represents a significant investment in the region’s power network.

The new cables are being installed in the 1953 tunnel, via the entrance at Dunford Bridge, by the Electricity Alliance - East on behalf of National Grid.
(From here, written in 2008.)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page