Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 20 Apr 2024
- Three men killed in retail park car crash named
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
- Three men killed in retail park car crash identified
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
07:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
10:03 London Paddington to Penzance
10:09 Gloucester to Westbury
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
08:55 Paignton to London Paddington
09:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 11:51:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[296] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[235] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[56] On reservations, fees and supplements - Interrail
[39] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[35] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[17] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs to Bedwyn initially delayed - now running from May 2019  (Read 38261 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9832



View Profile
« on: November 27, 2018, 07:23:07 »

I understand from two reliable sources that the introduction of IET (Intercity Express Train) services to Bedwyn, planned for January, has been delayed.

Apparently there is an issue with the cameras required for Driver Only Operation.  Work is being carried out to rectify this and gain safety approval.   In the meantime the Turbos will continue on that route.

Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2018, 10:10:34 »

From elsewhere:
Quote
ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) have advised the company that they are no longer willing to use the bodyside cameras until modifications are made by Hitachi. The Oxford services can continue to run as they are dispatched by platform staff, but the Bedwyn services rely on the cameras at all stations after Reading.

Quote
It's to do with the way the images are stitched together on screen.  The principle of DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) IET (Intercity Express Train) on LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) routes was agreed in the harmonization pay deal this year.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2018, 13:36:05 »

The quality of image can be very poor.  I’m not surprised this action has been taken, though hopefully it’ll be a fairly simple fix.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2018, 13:36:56 »

As quoted on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum:

Quote
It is to do with the cameras themselves. They get dirty very quickly. ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) has raised the issue and a cleaning regime was put in place but late last week, after extensive investigations, including looking into individual journeys where severe degradation was noted during the journey itself, as well as hearing the news from ASLEF HQ (Headquarters), GWR (Great Western Railway) took the decision that in Driver Only dispatch using the Hitachi cameras, there was a real risk of trap and drag and therefore it cannot be allowed.

Where there are station dispatchers, DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) operation will continue but the Bedwyn services stop at unmanned stations so the IET (Intercity Express Train) conversion of those services can't go ahead until the trains are suitably modified and judged, by unions and GWR alike, to be safe to operate in full DOO mode.

Hitachi have been pointed towards the cl.387 camera arrangement, itself a rip-off of a Siemens design.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2018, 14:17:53 »

It must be fate - Send them to Portsmouth-Cardiff instead!  Grin

[ducks...]
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2018, 15:15:05 »

Or introduce guards on the services?

(ducks further)
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40786



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2018, 15:30:36 »

Or introduce guards on the services?

(ducks further)

And if you do that extend them all to Westbury.  (ducks even further)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1531



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2018, 16:04:02 »

I do have a number of spare tin hats if anyone feels the need !.
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2018, 16:06:44 »

Ah well, at least we will hopefully get some 387's (as far as Newbury) on the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury) in January  Roll Eyes
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2018, 16:57:45 »

Never did understand why its IETs (Intercity Express Train) to Bedwyn.  Better to have a full 387 service Paddington/Reading - Newbury (with occaisional stops on West Country trains), with a 165/166 diesel shuttle from Newbury to Bedwyn (the latter being covered by one unit all day).
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2018, 17:27:11 »

The Bedwyn brigade did not like that suggestion one bit!
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9832



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2018, 17:28:43 »

SandTEngineer, I'd borrow one of Western Pathfinder's tin hats and pop to Bedwyn, Hungerford or Kintbury….  Wink
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2018, 17:41:20 »

Never did understand why its IETs (Intercity Express Train) to Bedwyn.  Better to have a full 387 service Paddington/Reading - Newbury (with occaisional stops on West Country trains), with a 165/166 diesel shuttle from Newbury to Bedwyn (the latter being covered by one unit all day).
That was of course the intention stated in the 2015 stakeholder brief. 

I guess they must have forgotten to consult the right stakeholders, because it didn’t survive long at all...

Paul
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2018, 17:58:32 »

I would be interested to know (if anybody does), what the actual rail usage each day is from Bedwyn/Hungerford/Kintbury that justifies an hourly 5 coach through service to Reading/London?  I accept that a through service may be justified in the peaks.

I don't need to wear a tin hat as I have a thick skin grown over many years of hard graft in the S&T (Signalling and Telegraph) trade..... Tongue Grin
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40786



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2018, 19:10:36 »

Berks and Hants services are a very interesting study.

Today, there's a though train from London to Bedwyn every hour, a Reading to Newbury train every hour, and West of England expresses about every hour with some extras and some being not-quite-express. All have been diesel, though some of the West of England trains are starting to run under electric power from London to Reading.

Come the new year and planned timetable changes, there will be a though train from London to Bedwyn every hour, a Reading to Newbury train every hour, and West of England expresses about every hour with some extras and some being not-quite-expresses every two hours.   Note strike through and underline changes.

Agreed - not ideal.   But then many service from London load heavily from the termini and get thinner further out - I remember in my youth riding between Knockholt and Dunton Green on stoppers that weren't exactly crammed, even though the 10 car program had been put into place to add the two extra carriages on the line.   You see the same thing of buses that go out from town centres to boondocks - you can't remove the final bit from the run; not only do you get a lot of flack and really upset people's livelihoods, but you also slice off bits of the inner traffic too and render the next bit uneconomic too ... and so on until you have no bus left.

Idea.

At present, 5 trains every 2 hours head west from Newbury.   Reduce that to 4.  The two West of England Expresses remain - an hourly service for the businesses of Plymouth who, as we all know, would shrivel and die if the train takes a minute over 3 hours  Wink ... and the other two from London and Reading then Newbury, Hungerford, Kintbury, Bedwyn, Pewsey and Westbury, continuing on (hourly, I would hope!) to Castle Cary, Taunton and Exeter St. David's.

Hungerford and Bedwyn get a proper service west.  The quite trains you forecast west of Newbury to Bedwyn have other flows using them.  Pewsey - very much a growth station is up to hourly and there are decent connection from the Kennet Valley and Vale of Pewsey to Trowbridge, Bath and Bristol.  Traffic connecting westward at the Westbury hub has an hourly service in a high quality train (sorry Broadgage - no buffet, just a trolley) where at the moment there are four hour gaps.   Oh - and you release one slot every 2 hours between London and Reading.

The planned electric shuttle between Reading and Newbury, if I have my calculations right, will require 2 units; that would only go up to 3 for a half hourly service, making proper use of all that expensive electrification and allowing some work with intermediate stopping patterns.

Like I say - "idea".   I too have a tin hat - not sure whether or not I'll need it ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page