Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
Additional 18:25 Shalford to Reading
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 19:21:17 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: NR ORR Improvement Notice - 29 November 2018  (Read 1085 times)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« on: November 29, 2018, 16:00:27 »

http://orr.gov.uk/news-and-media/press-releases/2018/orr-takes-formal-action-against-network-rail-to-deliver-improved-performance

Quote
ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) takes formal action against Network Rail to deliver improved performance

Passengers rely on both Network Rail and train operators to deliver performance but the role of the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is to examine Network Rail’s contribution. As such, ORR has today taken action against Network Rail to require improvements in its capability to deliver better performance.

ORR’s half year ‘Network Rail Monitor’, covering April to mid-October 2018 and published today, shows punctuality and reliability at their lowest levels since the current five year control period began in 2014, with factors such as extreme weather and problems implementing the May 2018 timetable playing a part.

As well as ORR’s own monitoring, a series of recent independent reviews into train performance have now concluded and highlighted many areas where Network Rail, and train operators, must improve.

Evidence from these reviews indicate weaknesses specifically with both Network Rail’s approach to performance planning and its capability to recover services following incidents. ORR considers Network Rail to appear to be contravening Licence Condition 1: Network Management.

The Provisional Order issued today requires Network Rail and its Route Managing Directors to take the following urgent action to address these failings:

Step up engagement and work with train operators to review and develop actions to address the underlying causes that have led to the findings identified in the relevant reviews (referred to above);
Deliver a report to ORR by 15 February 2019, detailing how it is identifying the common underlying issues relating to performance planning and its capability to recover service from incidents on its network. We also require the report to address how Network Rail is implementing the conclusions of its report;
Provide ORR with subsequent and regular updates on progress in delivering its report. These updates may include any interim findings and representations regarding the extent to which it considers it is doing everything reasonably practicable to meet its obligations in Condition 1 in relation to its performance management capability.

Today’s Monitor also reports on Network Rail’s progress with getting ready to deliver efficiently in CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024), the five-year control period that starts in April 2019.

Network Rail is in a better position than it was at this point five years ago to deliver the volumes of work required and improve efficiency. In terms of where we expect the company to be it has made progress establishing a more efficient work planning system, secured better access to the network for its engineering works and recruited more maintenance staff.

However, Network Rail’s plans to make efficiency savings are less advanced than they need to be and there is more to do in the four months before CP6 starts. We will report publicly on Network Rail’s progress again in March 2019.

John Larkinson, Chief Executive, ORR said: "Today’s decision is a clear demonstration of ORR’s approach to how we will hold Network Rail to account.

"Passengers and freight customers rely on Network Rail for punctual and reliable train services and the evidence we have collected suggests to us that Network Rail is failing to take all reasonable steps to effectively manage performance and recover from incidents on its network. This is a capability issue which must be addressed urgently.

"We need to act now, rather than wait for the end of the financial year, to ensure Network Rail is ready for the start of the next control period, CP6, on 1 April 2019."
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2018, 18:54:40 »


Pity someone can't issue a "Notice of Improvement" to the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about).

OTC
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2018, 21:28:13 »

Economists - particularly economic regulators love their "efficiency savings".  They compare two things and find one costs less than another and therefore conclude that there must be efficiency savings to be found.  They have not determined whether the two things they were comparing are both apples or whether they were comparing apples with pairs!

Other media sources have said NR» (Network Rail - home page) could be fined.  So someone is not efficient enough.  They have no other source of income and since they are public sector company they do not pay a dividend so that cannot be scrapped.  So they fail to reduce costs so they must do it for even less! Like making them make more bricks without giving them straw!

On another thread we read about years of backlog on vegetation management.  I don't know how many years were meant, but I suspect it was longer than the NR has been in existence and knowing BR (British Rail(ways)) I suspect it might go back to those times. So NR must now play catch of on years of back maintenance - while still cutting costs.

We know many other areas where NR is trying to deal with many years of back maintenance.  Perhaps because a previous management saddled with unreasonable demands for "efficiency savings" had thought that was where there "efficiency savings" could come from - knowing that it wouldn't become a problem until after they had retired!

This is madness. 

BT made massive efficiency savings just after it was privatised - they did this because the new digital exchange technology needed hugely less maintenance than the old mechanical exchanges. They funded the massive redundancy bill off the back of the pension fund surplus that almost every pension fund had then. Did this lead regulators and politicians into a false view that public sector organisations can always find massive "efficiency savings".

Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2018, 20:13:50 »

CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) funding has less major renewals / enhancements but is targeted more towards maintenance and maintenance type renewals.  The area I work in the Maintenance Delivery Units have had their team numbers increased, these are boots on the ground staff.

Quite where we are going to recruit the number of technically trained staff for Signalling, Electrification etc now we will no longer be able to recruit as easily in Europe who knows
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2018, 20:40:01 »

Quite where we are going to recruit the number of technically trained staff for Signalling, Electrification etc now we will no longer be able to recruit as easily in Europe who knows

You are not the only people with that concern!
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2018, 21:23:31 »

I'll come back for a small fee....... Grin
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2018, 13:07:08 »

Economists - "efficiency savings". 

In any State run organisation  "effiency savings"  is just a euphemism for a "budget cut".

Other media sources have said NR» (Network Rail - home page) could be fined. 


If NR is "fined" - a "fine" is yet another euphemism for a "budget cut"..........................
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2018, 08:55:16 »

I've put this here but the moderators might decide to move it.  Interesting that ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) get a lot of flak as well: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmtrans/1163/116302.htm
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page