Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:25:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Call / data centre response time  (Read 14509 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 15, 2018, 06:52:20 »

From The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
The Army needs another 5,500 troops to reach its target for a fully-fledged force.

But after giving a £495m recruitment contract to outsourcing giant Capita, the time taken from application to basic training has run as long as 321 days.

Some 47% of applicants drop out during the process - and the Army and Capita believe the length of time is a factor.

I've come across this story before - posting here because (as I understand it) some rail industry customer service is also outsourced to Capita and I've not heard of them being  too fast at responding.

Personal experience of contracts to run training courses where big government agencies outsource specialist training management to Capita mean that I very much believe the story.   The admin, form filling, chasing and delays have turned what should be straightforward bookings and fun courses to give into nightmares - "why did we ever bid for that", "what's the excuse for not paying yet this time" and "never again".  Like I say - personal experience and not necessarily a reflection on the company as a whole - though the BBC story suggests my personal experience is not unique.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1336



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2018, 09:09:59 »

Yet another horror story relating to the nonperformance of Capita.  The problem is that when you go out to tender you have to accept the lowest price.  The winning bid cuts corners to give the lowest price and this is reflected in future performance with insufficient resources to deliver the service properly
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2018, 09:58:03 »

It is also another case of believing you can take a service to essentially be all delivered online, or a substantial part of it, and pay for this by dismantling the existing structure, in this case a large reduction of on the high street recruiting centres. Leaving aside for a moment the complexity of delivering a robust working system on time (which doesn't seem to have happened here), it does make it more inaccessible to parts of the community. Probably there was a thought that since recruitment is from the young end of the population these would all have ready access to the internet and be comfortable with it. Even if that were true, possibly the diminishing high street presence seems to have had a greater effect than calculated.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2018, 10:22:59 »

August 1989 I walked into the Royal Navy recruitment centre in Taunton. I had my aptitude tests, medical and final interview within 6 weeks.

RN didn't want me, but that's another story...
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2018, 11:31:44 »

August 1989 I walked into the Royal Navy recruitment centre in Taunton. I had my aptitude tests, medical and final interview within 6 weeks.

RN didn't want me, but that's another story...
I was in 5 weeks after first enquiring.  Early December ‘71 advised by school that 6th form had been a mistake.  Roll Eyes  Arrived at Torpoint early January 1972.

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2018, 11:35:33 »

Yet another horror story relating to the nonperformance of Capita.  The problem is that when you go out to tender you have to accept the lowest price.  The winning bid cuts corners to give the lowest price and this is reflected in future performance with insufficient resources to deliver the service properly

You don't actually.  I always wrote into tender documents the phrase. The client will not necessarily accept the lowest or any tender. 

The difficulty is that the short termist bean counters can't bring themselves to accept anything other than the lowest tender, regardless of the consequences. 
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2018, 15:59:49 »

Quote
   
   
Re: Call / data centre response time
« Reply #5 on: Today at 11:35:33 am »
Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: rogerw on Today at 09:09:59 am
Yet another horror story relating to the nonperformance of Capita.  The problem is that when you go out to tender you have to accept the lowest price.  The winning bid cuts corners to give the lowest price and this is reflected in future performance with insufficient resources to deliver the service properly

You don't actually.  I always wrote into tender documents the phrase. The client will not necessarily accept the lowest or any tender. 

The difficulty is that the short termist bean counters can't bring themselves to accept anything other than the lowest tender, regardless of the consequences.

Absolutely! It is bad practice simply to take a lowest bid, and anyone running a tender process properly should shortlist, appraise and interview. I expect the problem is partly that public sector procurement is under heavy handed pressure from HM Treasury and that there is a limited number of "the usual suspects" that pitch for everything, and they are selected applying the old "no-one got sacked for choosing IBM" rule.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2018, 16:57:35 »

I almost fell off my chair when I heard that my own business were outsourcing work to Capita, I know it's fashionable to criticise them (in some cases with good reason), but our experience has been pretty positive.

Obviously can't go into too much detail, but they weren't the cheapest, we worked (and continued to work) very closely with them and treat them as partners, rather than contractors, and we set realistic KPIs which at the moment they are hitting every month.

There are a lot of very committed and dedicated people within their organisation but I get that as a group they are vast and disparate and people's experience will be very different.

GWRs (Great Western Railway) already woeful customer service seemed to take even more of a dive when they moved a lot of it to Capita, but I guess it's worth asking whether or not they have specified, and are paying for, the sort of service which their customers deserve? 
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2018, 16:58:06 »

Yet another horror story relating to the nonperformance of Capita.  The problem is that when you go out to tender you have to accept the lowest price.  The winning bid cuts corners to give the lowest price and this is reflected in future performance with insufficient resources to deliver the service properly

You don't actually.  I always wrote into tender documents the phrase. The client will not necessarily accept the lowest or any tender. 

The difficulty is that the short termist bean counters can't bring themselves to accept anything other than the lowest tender, regardless of the consequences. 

In my experience the consequences of blindly accepting the lowest tender was often a contractor who then failed to meet the contract terms. The Gov't Dept concerned would not then exercise their legal rights to enforce the contract, indeed they often ended up throwing even more money at the failed contractor or brought someone else in who said they could do the job at the lowest price............repeat ad nauseam.....

...........I think the whole of the Palace of Westminster has been outsourced to the lowest bidder too !! Peanut & Monkeys.......
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2018, 17:14:39 »

Yet another horror story relating to the nonperformance of Capita.  The problem is that when you go out to tender you have to accept the lowest price.  The winning bid cuts corners to give the lowest price and this is reflected in future performance with insufficient resources to deliver the service properly

You don't actually.  I always wrote into tender documents the phrase. The client will not necessarily accept the lowest or any tender. 

The difficulty is that the short termist bean counters can't bring themselves to accept anything other than the lowest tender, regardless of the consequences. 

In my experience the consequences of blindly accepting the lowest tender was often a contractor who then failed to meet the contract terms. The Gov't Dept concerned would not then exercise their legal rights to enforce the contract, indeed they often ended up throwing even more money at the failed contractor or brought someone else in who said they could do the job at the lowest price............repeat ad nauseam.....


Public sector procurement has been a disaster for decades, and the scenario you describe has been very common...…….a lot of these contractors knew that they could get away with murder, as the financial slack was absorbed by the taxpayer, rather than the bottom line of a more commercially astute, professional Client who would be far more rigorous and less forgiving of failure............the saying "you get what you pay for" should be printed in huge letters at the top of each ITT (Invitation to Tender)!!!

Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2018, 21:06:13 »

In my experience the consequences of blindly accepting the lowest tender was often a contractor who then failed to meet the contract terms. The Gov't Dept concerned would not then exercise their legal rights to enforce the contract, indeed they often ended up throwing even more money at the failed contractor or brought someone else in who said they could do the job at the lowest price............repeat ad nauseam.....

...........I think the whole of the Palace of Westminster has been outsourced to the lowest bidder too !! Peanut & Monkeys.......

I am inclined to agree.  The view seems to be that the risk is outsourced so it someone else's fault.  The same view that today has brought us the concept of managed no deal.  When asked what would the manager do Redwood answered 'I don't know I'm not a manager'

It seems that the logic of these people is appoint someone to do the impossible and that's Ok! It's then their fault when it fails and you sack them.  Forgetting the fact that the taxpayer still has to pick up the pieces. 
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2019, 12:06:28 »

Capita is often spelt with an "R" inserted after the first letter, there are good reasons for this.
Whilst it is interesting to hear from a respected member of a more positive experience of Capita, such experiences seem to be in the minority.

BTW (by the way), I applied for a job with BR (British Rail(ways)) decades ago, long before outsourcing, and got an interview the same week. I failed the medical, but at least I knew this promptly and could pursue alternatives. How long would it take these days ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2019, 14:20:08 »

Public sector procurement has been a disaster for decades, and the scenario you describe has been very common...…….a lot of these contractors knew that they could get away with murder, as the financial slack was absorbed by the taxpayer, rather than the bottom line of a more commercially astute, professional Client who would be far more rigorous and less forgiving of failure............the saying "you get what you pay for" should be printed in huge letters at the top of each ITT (Invitation to Tender)!!!

Its not just public sector the private sector can be just as bad. 
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2019, 16:14:38 »

When I first moved from the private to the public sector I could not believe the abysmal quality of major public contracts, and the monitoring of them. It hasn't improved during my time working in the public sector. I am still amazed that all too often there are no information clauses so there is no way of adequately monitoring the contract, just blindly hand over the money.
On the subject of the not taking the cheapest quote, and trying out new things I am always told that one mustn't gamble with public money.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2019, 08:43:59 »

When I first moved from the private to the public sector I could not believe the abysmal quality of major public contracts, and the monitoring of them. It hasn't improved during my time working in the public sector. I am still amazed that all too often there are no information clauses so there is no way of adequately monitoring the contract, just blindly hand over the money.
On the subject of the not taking the cheapest quote, and trying out new things I am always told that one mustn't gamble with public money.

Yep, I went the other way (so to speak!) public to private and the difference was incredible, looking back, having had the perspective of both sectors, you do sometimes wonder how the public sector never seems to learn and is so reluctant/resistant to change......the "that's not how it's done around here" philosophy is still very much dominant.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page