Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
Correct, not at all, or with caution? - [here]
 tomorrow - First Bath Bus panel
23/01/2019 - Melksham Rail User Group
03/02/2019 - Looe Brush
09/02/2019 - Coffee Shop Constitution
16/02/2019 - Keep this date
25/02/2019 - TransWilts Members Meeting
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
January 21, 2019, 01:21:38 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[126] HST Laira, Bristol, Crewkerne and Exeter to Stoke Gifford
[66] Bus and train tickets inter availability, 70 years ago
[64] Best ticket combo?
[56] Glastonbury 2019
[44] The Coffee Shop - planning ahead
[32] Smartcards - can't transfer paper ticket
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: 2019 - TransWilts cancellation and amendments log  (Read 748 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: January 12, 2019, 06:18:07 pm »

Does the lack of posts in the last week mean that the first full working week of 2019 was trouble free? Reading back a few pages of history it would seem that would be a welcome new year's gift, and hopefully a sign of better things to come?

There have been no issues that have made Journey check single last weekend.   Having said that, on SUNDAY trains were terminated at Chippenham (planned) and passengers for Swindon had to wait there up to 80 minutes for the onward train.

But, generally, good news this week. A few trains a few minutes late. 

I have been asked to provide a log of late running, etc, at the end of each month to TransWilts and that's being generated at http://www.mrug.org.uk/record.html - a quick look back every few days though Real Time Trains will give me missing background data.   Frankly, unless a keyconnection misses such as the Sunday morning one at Westbury for Weymouth, or coming back from Bristol the 17:49 into the TransWilts train at Trowbridge, a few minutes delay really don't matter.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2019, 05:43:29 am »

Breaking news ... broken freight on single line via Melksham ... summoning help and single line closed in the meantime!

Starting to show on Melksham Rail User Group dynamic record at http://www.mrug.org.uk/record.html and out live running feed at http://www.mrug.org.uk/live.html
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2019, 06:04:45 am »

See attachment ....
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2019, 06:19:54 am »

See attachment ....

And sorted??

Quote
05:17 Gloucester to Southampton Central due 08:09
05:17 Gloucester to Southampton Central due 08:09 is now running as scheduled.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
bignosemac
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 16382


Question everything.


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2019, 06:24:47 am »

Someone had too much for breakfast this morning.

Quote
6A15 is struggling on the Melksham single line

Driver reported the train is travelling at 1mph

Train formed of loco 59202 and 3,538 tonnes trailing

Train is overweight for the route

*******************************

Train Defect - 6A15 Melksham single line Update 05:30

Train will remain on the Melksham single line until an assisting loco is summonned.

Due to being overweight for the route, it has been denied access onto the Main line and to protect the London morning peak service

Traiin has 3,538 tonnes trailing - the weight restriction is 3210 tonnes

Trains that are booked to run via Melksham will be diverted via Bathampton Jn
Logged

Time flies by when you're a driver of a train,
Speeding out of Trumpton with a cargo of cocaine.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2019, 09:03:02 am »

Quote
07:04 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 09:05
07:04 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 09:05 will no longer call at Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse.
It has been delayed at Westbury and is now 35 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.

Quote
07:33 Westbury to Swindon due 08:15
07:33 Westbury to Swindon due 08:15 has been delayed at Westbury and is now 34 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2019, 12:11:45 pm »

Quote
07:04 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 09:05
07:04 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 09:05 will no longer call at Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse.
It has been delayed at Westbury and is now 35 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.

Quote
07:33 Westbury to Swindon due 08:15
07:33 Westbury to Swindon due 08:15 has been delayed at Westbury and is now 34 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.


Is this at Westbury? Well I said they should of installed better points, those looked old fashioned. When they relaid the tracks in Oxford they used the ones, that I thought they always install now.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2019, 04:20:12 pm »

Is this at Westbury? Well I said they should of installed better points, those looked old fashioned. When they relaid the tracks in Oxford they used the ones, that I thought they always install now.

Most likely just teething troubles.  We may be very frustrated at all that relaxin without a fourth track alongside the empty platform face (or at least a stub for it) at the same time, but I rather suspect they'll have put the right stuff in - indeed if anything they may have over-engineered.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2019, 05:15:24 pm »

Is this at Westbury? Well I said they should of installed better points, those looked old fashioned. When they relaid the tracks in Oxford they used the ones, that I thought they always install now.

Most likely just teething troubles.  We may be very frustrated at all that relaxin without a fourth track alongside the empty platform face (or at least a stub for it) at the same time, but I rather suspect they'll have put the right stuff in - indeed if anything they may have over-engineered.



Yes I felt that this relaying of Westbury was a waste of money. When network rail could of spent the money on schemes to relieve congestion, like in Gloucester they could of installed two new signals to allow bi-directional working on the lines to Barnwood from Horton road Junction. This should of been done in the 80.s when plat 4 was brought into use. Now due to this, crosscountry do not stop many of their trains due to long reversal times.

Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 17, 2019, 05:19:58 pm »

Westbury should of been done, when they could close the station for 7 weeks and relayed the tracks from end to end and replaced the signalling on to TVSC(LIKE THEY DID IN OXFORD) or somewhere, and brought in the unused platform, everyone would be happy, even graham as they would of two tracked the Melksham line as well. I think I need to work for NR then it would get done.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 23358



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #25 on: January 18, 2019, 04:40:58 pm »

Quote
19:32 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 21:33
Facilities on the 19:32 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 21:33.
This is due to a fault on this train.
Will be formed of 3 coaches instead of 2.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Member of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and some more things besides
RA
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 116


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 18, 2019, 05:37:48 pm »

Quote
07:04 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 09:05
07:04 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 09:05 will no longer call at Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse.
It has been delayed at Westbury and is now 35 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.

Quote
07:33 Westbury to Swindon due 08:15
07:33 Westbury to Swindon due 08:15 has been delayed at Westbury and is now 34 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.


Is this at Westbury? Well I said they should of installed better points, those looked old fashioned. When they relaid the tracks in Oxford they used the ones, that I thought they always install now.

The points failure was at Hawkeridge Junction. These points weren't replaced in the Westbury blockade.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants