Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 16:42:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Alstom and Eversholt to hydrogenate class 321s  (Read 11083 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2019, 22:42:46 »

It is also worth remembering that batteries are still improving, and that a battery train or a 25Kv/battery hybrid train built today can be retrofitted with improved batteries in years to come.

Hydrogen storage by contrast is unlikely to improve.
High pressure gas tanks and cylinders are a mature and well understood technology, it seems unlikely that much improvement will occur.

We might find cheaper ways to manufacture hydrogen, but it is always going to cost more than the electricity or other energy used as the input.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2019, 22:47:14 »

Hydrogen storage is unlikely to improve but fuel cells might. Your point about retrofitting with more efficient batteries is good though.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2019, 12:05:32 »

Concerning the perceived risks of running trains with leaking hydrogen tanks or piping through tunnels. I would point out that the area of operation of the Alstom iLint trains in northern Germany is flat. Tunnels are unknown.

So I don't think that the experience gained there will read across in its entirety to the UK (United Kingdom).
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2019, 12:15:14 »

Whenever I hear of another venture into hydrogen-powered vehicles, I'm reminded of a book review purportedly written by a 10-year-old after spending the summer reading a book called 'All About Wasps':-

Quote
This book told me everything I could possibly want to know about wasps, except: Why?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2019, 12:19:15 »

A tweet by the editor of Rail Engineer magazine says hydrogen trains require 3 times as much electricity as an electric train and 8 times the fuel storage volume of a diesel, for the same energy store.
https://twitter.com/DavidShirres/status/1083076698231443456
Quote
Further to recent Tweets about Alston’s UK (United Kingdom) Hydrogen train, this slide has key points that need to be understood to assess potential of these trains. 2nd last bullet is particularly topical
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2019, 12:57:44 »

There's an article about these trains in Rail 870... but I wouldn't rush out to buy it on the strength of that.

The issue of energy density (referred to in Bmblbzzz's post) needs consideration: ICE power plants are typically around 20% efficient (YMMV (Your Method/Mileage May Vary)), whilst fuel cells are around 35%; batteries on the other hand are around 99% efficient - so when comparing energy density, you need to bear in mind how much of that energy is going to make it to the electric motor.

I still don't get why anyone is investing in this technology. Is it something to do with the fact that PPE courses don't contain a 'simple applied physics' module?

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2019, 13:08:52 »

Could the tanks explode in very hot weather?.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2019, 02:39:05 »

Could the tanks explode in very hot weather?.

Hopefully the well understood increase in pressure at high temperatures has been thought of.
And of course even if the train is not actually moving, but is available for service, then some hydrogen will be consumed for auxiliary purposes. Any consumption drops the pressure in the tank.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 16, 2019, 08:21:27 »

The problem with gas on trains in the past has been what happens in an accident if the tanks or connecting pipes are ruptured in an accident.  Was it Quintinshill where we learnt that lesson?  And are we now to forget it?
Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 16, 2019, 12:08:03 »

The problem with gas on trains in the past has been what happens in an accident if the tanks or connecting pipes are ruptured in an accident.  Was it Quintinshill where we learnt that lesson?  And are we now to forget it?

There was a programme on tv some months ago, that I watched and it showed an old wooden carriage train explode, after the gas tanks on the roof ignited. The tanks powered the lighting.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2019, 12:39:01 »

The problem with gas on trains in the past has been what happens in an accident if the tanks or connecting pipes are ruptured in an accident.  Was it Quintinshill where we learnt that lesson?  And are we now to forget it?

I think the problem with Pintsch gas was that it was heavier than air, and thus sank into the wreckage until it found a source of ignition. Hydrogen on the other hand stands a decent chance of floating away harmlessly.

Doesn't make hydrogen trains any less pointless, but it does make them sound a bit safer!
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2019, 16:33:02 »

Quote
A tweet by the editor of Rail Engineer magazine says hydrogen trains require 3 times as much electricity as an electric train and 8 times the fuel storage volume of a diesel, for the same energy store.

So, in summary-

1 - You only get two coaches of accommodation in a three coach train
2 - They cannot routinely run through tunnels for safety reasons, so on GW (Great Western) could only run on the Thames Valley branches (not North Downs - tunnel south of Guildford) or east of Chippenham. Even in flat East Anglia, there's a tunnel just south of Ipswich!
3 - Vast amounts of electricity required to produce the hydrogen

I'm not sure "Breeze" is an appropriate name - perhaps "BRitish EXperimental Innovation Train", which shortens nicely to something else topical.....

Electrification now!


Logged
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2019, 16:50:17 »

Quote
A tweet by the editor of Rail Engineer magazine says hydrogen trains require 3 times as much electricity as an electric train and 8 times the fuel storage volume of a diesel, for the same energy store.

So, in summary-

1 - You only get two coaches of accommodation in a three coach train
2 - They cannot routinely run through tunnels for safety reasons, so on GW (Great Western) could only run on the Thames Valley branches (not North Downs - tunnel south of Guildford) or east of Chippenham. Even in flat East Anglia, there's a tunnel just south of Ipswich!
3 - Vast amounts of electricity required to produce the hydrogen

I'm not sure "Breeze" is an appropriate name - perhaps "BRitish EXperimental Innovation Train", which shortens nicely to something else topical.....

Electrification now!




So really no good between Cardiff and Portsmouth.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2019, 18:00:31 »

I'm not sure "Breeze" is an appropriate name
It makes me think of this: https://www.letsride.co.uk/breeze
An initiative to get more women into sporty cycling, of which someone (a woman actually involved with the scheme) said "It sounds like a name for sanitary towel." Roll Eyes
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 03, 2019, 18:35:42 »

It seems Vivarail have taken a perhaps surprising decision regarding their new hydrogen powered train in that they intend to store the hydrogen under the carriage.

http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-spearheads-development-of-green-fuel-technologies/

I say surprising as some earlier forum discussion seems to have indicated that this wasn't a very desirable option from a safety point of view. It's only in development right now but it might be interesting to see which applications it may suit.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page