Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:34:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: £260m Oxford-Witney Rail Proposal  (Read 7351 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2019, 14:32:33 »

A new alignment from Witney/Carterton to Hanborough was being looked at by the North Cotswold Line Taskforce I believe, rather than using the old alignment direct to Wolvercote.  Though I'm not sure why!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2019, 15:36:07 »

A new alignment from Witney/Carterton to Hanborough was being looked at by the North Cotswold Line Taskforce I believe, rather than using the old alignment direct to Wolvercote.  Though I'm not sure why!

OK - I can crayon that on the map too - in orange.   
Advantages
1. Trains also provide service at Hanborough
2. Might be able to reach Carterton / Brize Norton with significant military traffic??
3. Closer to Witney
Disadvatages
1. Longer and new alignment may throw up issues
2. Station where the lines meet would be called Combe Junction which could get confused with Coombe Junction
3. Eynesham not served

At the early stage of a project, multiple options are suggested and we should look for the one that best meets what we're looking to achieve, and not just something which is good (or even excellent) in that direction. I would not like to call either way with my minimal background, but what an excellent opportunity to use what I was taught in sales training as the "alternative close".  Ask the local council whether they want option (a) or option (b) and have them chose - they'll take pride in their decision and not even notice that you didn't offer them a park and ride or guided bus solution at all.  Grin
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1204


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2019, 16:12:14 »

It's hilly (so you'd need serious earthworks) and in, or bordering, the Cotswold AONB (Areas Of Natural Beauty) (so you wouldn't be allowed serious earthworks). There's huge amounts of housing development going on around Eynsham - too much to miss. I'm slightly surprised it was ever considered!
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2019, 22:17:08 »

Quote
OK - I can crayon that on the map too - in orange.   

Steady on Isambard Kingdom Ellis!

Richard S is right, and I think the East Gloucestershire Railway promoters, who started what ended up as the Fairford branch (red and blue lines on your plan) got the first stage of their proposed direct route from Oxford to Cheltenham route, the red bit, right. I think it was originally intended to go via Burford and Northleach, and through a tunnel under the Cotswolds. The money ran out, so they changed the route to provide a single line branch to Fairford instead.

Now, wouldn't the original proposal now make a project of Victorian grandness! It would of course have to be broadgage (7ft 0.5 inches between rails, not meat and two veg catering on all trains...) for a smoother ride and larger trains - the New East Gloucestershire Railway!

I am off to get my stovepipe top hat, waistcoat and watch chain, grow some muttonchop sideburns and buy a carriage and four so I can ride around visiting the landed gentry and town merchants raising support. New East Gloucestershire Railway three and a half percent preference loan stock, anyone?
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2019, 23:01:42 »

On a slightly more serious note, I am not sure I endorse all RG's suggestions.

Quote
Oxford is a great candidate for tram and tram train operation with all the available track bed in the area
and
Quote
Oxford is different to other cities, it hasn't evolved with suburbia in the same way.

Oxford still has substantial suburban areas with no old track bed available - most of the eastern suburbs north of Cowley for example, where much of the early to mid 20th century growth took place (Headington, Risinghurst, Barton, Marston) are all well away from any old rail routes, with nothing between the Bicester line and the Cowley branch/old Thame line).

I am not sure Oxford is suitable for on street trams either - the town centre streets are surely not wide enough, and if we can no longer countenance level crossings out of town, why is it thought trams in streets (especially ones heavily populated with students on bikes!) are acceptable?

Shouldn't we be looking at trolley buses instead? There will still no doubt be objections to the overhead lines, but there would not be the additional substantial capital investment in laying rails in streets which would trap cyclist's wheels. A rail trolley/ bus interchange at the station, between "real trains" from the current network and Witney and trolley buses on the routes radiating to Oxford's suburbs and its park and rides, their routes safeguarded by bus only lanes in appropriate places would surely be more cost effective, improve Oxford's poor air quality and benefit most of the commuters and visitors to Oxford.

[it's also nice for us Reading folk to be able to be able to tell those Oxford folk how to run their city!]
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2019, 05:12:06 »

Logic, especially GRIP (Guide to Railway Investment Projects) and even JFDI (just flipping do it (polite version)) all tell us in the early stages to consider all options. So that does mean looking at a pretty full selection of modes and routes. Some of these rapidly show to be impractical. Others may meet (or seem to meet) differing objectives, or evaluate close enough to each other to lead to some really tough decisions having to be made.

From another project

Quote
JFDI - Just Do It principles - as proposed
1. Work out what you want to do
2. Work out how you can do it using established technology and resources
3. Think about what else it would do or enable
4. Ask yourself and informed others the questions (with a cutoff date):
-a are these outcome that we want?
-b will it work?
-c is there a (much) better way?
-d are there any show-stoppers?
-e does it muck up anything else?
If outcome of 4 doesn't throw up any problems
5. Work out who's going to lead the capital works and have them do it
6. Work out who's going to operate and who's going to maintain, and have them do it
7. Help promote, market, and tune the project and its planned outcomes
8. Pass on the completed project to the long term custodians
JFDI principles have been previously used in rail station construction - for example Workington North

GRIP - Guide to Rail Investment Process - rail alternative for larger projects
1. Define the output for the project. For example, connect new terminal.
2. Define the scope of the investment and identify constraints. Confirm that the outputs can be economically delivered and aligned with network strategy.
3. Develops options for addressing constraints. Assesses and selects the most appropriate option that delivers the stakeholder requirements together with confirmation that the outputs can be economically delivered.
4. Initiation of the development of the chosen single option.
5. Produces a complete, robust engineering design that underpins definitive cost / time / resource and risk estimates.
6. Delivery to the specification and testing to confirm operation in accordance with design
7. Transfer asset responsibility from the project team to the operator and maintainer.
8. Closeout in an orderly manner. Contractual accounts are settled and any contingencies or warranties are put into place. Assessment of benefits is carried out.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2019, 09:30:08 »

On a slightly more serious note, I am not sure I endorse all RG's suggestions.

Shouldn't we be looking at trolley buses instead? There will still no doubt be objections to the overhead lines, but there would not be the additional substantial capital investment in laying rails in streets which would trap cyclist's wheels. A rail trolley/ bus interchange at the station, between "real trains" from the current network and Witney and trolley buses on the routes radiating to Oxford's suburbs and its park and rides, their routes safeguarded by bus only lanes in appropriate places would surely be more cost effective, improve Oxford's poor air quality and benefit most of the commuters and visitors to Oxford.

[it's also nice for us Reading folk to be able to be able to tell those Oxford folk how to run their city!]

In Reading or any town of Oxford's size I would suggest trolleybuses. This forgotten and much derided mode is surely the answer in a lot of small and medium sized places where the unsightly appearance of the overhead is outweighed by the practicality of it. I went for the tramway option for Oxford to reduce the impact of overhead in the centre, plus there is already a campaign underway for trams in Oxford. Tram running in the centre can be battery, or better still, the third rail arrangement as seen in places like Bordeaux. Although Oxford's suburbia is not as populated as some places, the city requires something to take the extraordinary amount of buses, and tourist coaches don't forget, out of the centre. A simple route for tram trains through the centre could potentially run from a junction just north of the rail station (or on dedicated tracks from Wolvercote), through Frideswilde Square, Park End Street, New Road, Queen Street, turning south at the Carfax, along St Aldate's, across Folly Bridge, along Abingdon Road to join the rail alignments near Redbridge park and ride. All wide enough for tram running. Adding a route into Oxford's eastern suburbs from the Carfax would only require a tramway to run along the High(street), which is more than wide enough to accomodate it,  and possibly down the Cowley Road or up to the Hospital. The three routes suggested in my previous posts would pass near three of the current five park and ride sites, while the car park on the eastern side at Thornhill would just move further east nearer the suggested route to Thame at the motorway service site. This is the sort of arrangement that would probably happen if Oxford was on mainland Europe but here is simply me dreaming away again. There would be all manner of objections, feasibility studies, cost benefit ratios, other odd types of modes considered and various other time delaying tactics that a simple (former) bus driver like me would not understand.

Anyway it's slightly off topic. I'm daydreaming again.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2019, 10:08:51 »

I would agree within the City itself, but there is the wider travel area. 

It is clear that Witney, Bicester, Abingdon, Didcot and Wantage ant the Cotswold line stations are all on existing or former rail routes.  What about an Oxford Metro including the Science Park?

Wallingford would be rather circuitous and Thame is has been ruled out before for reinstatement.  But Abingdon (Station in Audlet Drive Car Park or just east of Thames View) and Witney.   
Logged
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2019, 10:43:23 »

The science park would be served on my far fetched plan with a stop on the former rail alignment to Thame, which would only need to be tramway standard after Morris Cowley works. The idea of running tram trains is that some will run on current existing rail routes where as former alignments such as Witney and Abingdon will only require tram standard running lines. So a train in some places and a tram running on street in Oxford. All would be able to serve the centre of Oxford (probably the most popular destination from all these areas), the mainline rail station and create convenient interchange on the street running section for all other routes to places such as the Science park. All this would not require any more platform space at Oxford rail station. So most major towns in the Shire would be in direct link with Oxford and it's station, and only one change away from any of the other points including those longer distance places available from the station.

Logged
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2019, 15:38:33 »

If we're running people in Queen Street over with trams and drawing magic-marker maps, here is one from my archives:
Logged

Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: July 06, 2019, 16:07:42 »

Nice work. I still find it incredible that Queen Street is fully pedestrianised looking but buses still come down it every three minutes.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: July 06, 2019, 16:22:24 »

Nice work. I still find it incredible that Queen Street is fully pedestrianised looking but buses still come down it every three minutes.

Half the pedestrians are surprised by it too.
Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: July 06, 2019, 17:03:16 »

Quote from: eightonedee
... laying rails in streets which would trap cyclist's wheels.

This argument always intrigues me (and was also used in relation to the Weymouth Quay Tramway)

Hpw do cyclists manage in places like Amsterdam and Rotterdam? Full of cyclists and full of trams.

Or are our cyclists simply thicker than their Dutch counterparts, or indeed thicker than their grandparents and great grandparents who were riding their bikes amongst the tram lines all over the UK (United Kingdom) pre-WW2?
Logged
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: July 06, 2019, 17:11:07 »

Nice work. I still find it incredible that Queen Street is fully pedestrianised looking but buses still come down it every three minutes.

It's still the least awful route between the Station and Magdalen Bridge. I have visions of double deckers accidentally being routed via the Broad and getting stuck under Hertford College...
Logged

Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 06, 2019, 17:30:17 »

Quote from: eightonedee
... laying rails in streets which would trap cyclist's wheels.


Or are our cyclists simply thicker than their Dutch counterparts, or indeed thicker than their grandparents and great grandparents who were riding their bikes amongst the tram lines all over the UK (United Kingdom) pre-WW2?
And beyond. My dad recalled cycling over tram lines in Reading's King's Road in the 1960's. They were never a problem as he had eyesight.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page