Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 19 Mar 2024
- Potholes leave nations' roads at 'breaking point'
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - WWRUG AGM
23/03/24 - Trains restart - Minehead
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

No 'On This Day' events reported for 19th Mar

Train RunningCancelled
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
07:25 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington
08:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 25/03 16:00 Easter Escape - to where?
Closed 2024-03-16 Should our rail network go cashless
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 19, 2024, 10:13:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] A daily picture from my recent travels
[65] Where would you recommend for an Easter Escape?
[56] More travels ... more looking at how others do it ...
[54] M25 motorway issue: a most illuminating Twitter thread.
[49] 2024 Delays and Cancellations - North Cotswold Line
[46] Briefing on forthcoming changes - from GWR on 14.3.2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
Author Topic: Rail Delivery Group's Fair Fare consultation - outcome  (Read 18595 times)
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2019, 12:42:49 »

The off-peak day return being only slightly more than the single is still common for short distances.

Eg Didcot to either Reading or Oxford is single £6.70, return £6.80, Didcot-Swindon single £11.80, return £11.90, although there is a super off-peak single for £10.90. So it isn't even it just being a hang-over from NSE (Network South East) days.

So what should the price of a single leg journey be? Even the Anytime Day return from Didcot to Oxford is currently £7.50.

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12330


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2019, 14:04:59 »

you missed out the peak DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains)-SWI» (Swindon - next trains) fares.

OXF» (Oxford - next trains)-DID, the shorter the distance, yes, it looks as though the return probably has to rise as the single is probably priced about right.

BUT this is going to be the best chance to sort out the DID-SWI prices - which I think is the most expensive 12 mins on GWR (Great Western Railway). About the same time as OF from DID, it's nearly twice the price!
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 460


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2019, 15:47:27 »

you missed out the peak DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains)-SWI» (Swindon - next trains) fares.

OXF» (Oxford - next trains)-DID, the shorter the distance, yes, it looks as though the return probably has to rise as the single is probably priced about right.

BUT this is going to be the best chance to sort out the DID-SWI prices - which I think is the most expensive 12 mins on GWR (Great Western Railway). About the same time as OF from DID, it's nearly twice the price!


As a DID - OXF commuter, no thanks to the fare rise.

The peak DID-SWI anytime single is an incredible £24.20, peak DID- RDG(resolve) single is £10.

The DID-SWI prices are excessive compared with the Reading or Swindon fares but if you compare miles travelled rather time taken then it gives a slighly different complexion

DID - OXF - 10.35 miles - 64p per mile (peak single)
DID - SWI - 24.15 miles - £1 per mile (peak single)
DID - RDG - 18.25 miles - 54p per mile (peak single)

I am not sure where you get the 12 minutes for DID- SWI from as it appears to be more typically 17 minutes (looking at services 0800 from DID to SWI) and this compares with a typical DID-OXF journey of 15 - 19 minutes or a DID-RDG  journey of 13 - 15 minutes, all at the same time.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2019, 16:06:21 »

Bristol Temple Meads – Bath single £8.00. Return £8.10. I don't think I've ever bothered buying a single even when I've intended to come back by a different means. If I had to pay £8 each way I'd consider taking the <shudder> bus. If it were only £4 each way, would GWR (Great Western Railway) be interested in running it?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2019, 16:32:24 »

There used to be Advances sold between Didcot and Swindon starting from £3 (and Didcot to Oxford from £2.50) which were withdrawn.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2019, 18:57:51 »

There is such sense in having a uniform relationship between single and return fares, of having fares based on mileage, of having an "n" tier fare system where "n" is a big enough number to avoid the current frightening price steps between two successive trains. There is sense is saying that the fastest journey between any two stations at the time you are travelling is always a permitted route.   And as soon as you do that you render split ticketing pretty well pointless except for what it was really intended for in the first pace, and you simplify the routing guide render most of the easements unnecessary because your route is naturally allowed anyway.

Yes, roll out a system which caps fares over a period to replace the traditional season ticket – our 5.2 survey had more respondents making 2,3,or 4 days a week trips that were doing 5 days a week (though I question my data, as 5 day people tend to arrive at the station with seconds to spare and I suspect we disproportionality missed them on the 07:49)

But I have two problems.

1. The whole thing is based on a false ground rule.  (A) Income to remain the same, (B) System to be designer to grow ridership, (C) Average fair to not change.  Problem is, these three are incompatible.  If the ridership increases 10%, then the average fare should go down by 10% ... or the fare take goes up by 10%.  No-one at RDG(resolve) in the consultation could explain this apparent incomparability to me, and I suspect that the answer is that the average fare will remain the same and (if traffic growth is 10%) there will be a 10% increase from the fare basket.  This issue makes it hard for me to trust them to get the system right to reach their stated goals

2. At times it has been, and remains, difficult to 'persuade' a TOC (Train Operating Company) to do the right thing with fares in the past, so it's difficult for me to trust them when they say they'll do the right (fair) thing in the fare revamp.  Within the last year, I recall a certain TOC starting a train 6 minutes earlier than normal because of engineering works causing it to be diverted ... so not only did passengers have a slower journey, but they paid £20 to £30 more in some cases as they were now off peak not super off peak.  A rail replacement bus during engineering left 12 minutes before the normal train, and 5 minutes before the incoming connection - putting up fares for people who went the (only) alternative long way round by around £8.  And a ticket machine which to this day sells Off Peak tickets from the quick select menu all weekend when it should sell super off peak - I wonder how many people still pay £18 more than they should.

My examples are, sadly, all less than a year old.  Two of the three fare issues we fought (we had to do more than just ask) and the third remains, and I don't feel easy in my mind about the changes being truly evenly applied bearing in mind the shakey ground rules, and the recent record. Fear of a lion in sheep's clothing.  Gain my trust in these areas and, yes, I would be very supportive.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12330


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: February 18, 2019, 20:57:45 »

In relation to 1, my understanding is that the fare income will be neutral *at the point of change*....ie with the same fares sold on day -1 as day +1, the income would be the same.

Of course, sales of fares will difer over time & therefore the farebox over any period will be different.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2019, 08:07:27 »

In relation to 1, my understanding is that the fare income will be neutral *at the point of change*....ie with the same fares sold on day -1 as day +1, the income would be the same.

Of course, sales of fares will difer over time & therefore the farebox over any period will be different.

Thanks Chris - that answers it, and answers it well. It means (as I might have guessed) that additional income gained by a more attractive fare structure pulling in more customers goes into 'the system' and not (directly at least) back to the customer.  Interesting question for the longer term - might more and better spread customers for the same services lead to a better economic model and so better franchise settlements - so money would come (ha,ha) back to the public via treasury payments that would help reduce general taxation.  I am aware that throwing 8 bl**** great stone into the fares pond would in some instances result in a wave of people who's fares had rocketed finding alternatives, so the whole thing is not 100% gain on passengers.

As a passenger, I might not like the apparent (and easily read from objectives A and B) financial gain going to / through the rail industry, but it is totally understandable.  But why the **** didn't the people sent as experts by the RDG(resolve) to the stakeholder meeting they held in Bristol explain it, rather that just looking sheepish at the apparent fallacy when it was asked about.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2019, 09:32:36 »

There is such sense in having a uniform relationship between single and return fares, of having fares based on mileage, of having an "n" tier fare system where "n" is a big enough number to avoid the current frightening price steps between two successive trains.
Yes... but that also increases the likelihood of having the *wrong* ticket type for any journey, where wrong means either more expensive than necessary or invalid. Going the other way and having only one fare type (by time of travel, so erasing completely the peak v off-peak distinction) would remove these two problems entirely – but probably at the cost of even more overcrowding in peak times and empty trains at some other times.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12330


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2019, 09:37:54 »


Yes... but that also increases the likelihood of having the *wrong* ticket type for any journey, where wrong means either more expensive than necessary or invalid. Going the other way and having only one fare type (by time of travel, so erasing completely the peak v off-peak distinction) would remove these two problems entirely – but probably at the cost of even more overcrowding in peak times and empty trains at some other times.

undoubtedly....!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2019, 14:15:21 »


Could I offer a German word for what I fear the outcome will be  ?    Shame there isn't an English word like it.

   "Verschlimmbesserung"

The Guardian is not impressed either

It starts

Quote
The latest attempt to simplify our crazily complex rail ticketing system, hailed as a “once in a generation reform” is nothing of the sort. It is tinkering at the margins, which will result in some passengers being a little better off, a few a little worse off and Britain’s railway system still egregiously expensive and unfit for purpose.

The Rail Delivery Group’s (RDG(resolve)’s) new deal largely consists of part-time season tickets, a guarantee that passengers will get the cheapest prices and smartphone-based ticketing across the UK (United Kingdom).

It goes on to point out

Quote
Will the system become less complex? The RDG repeats an oft-quoted figure for how labyrinthine our ticketing system is, saying: “There are around 55m fares in the current system.”

Yet it then suggests that the train companies should be allowed to “create discounted, premium, train specific and personalised variations of these fares, for example, charging less at quieter periods, more for first class, less for reduced flexibility, and so on”. This is about creating more fare types, more complexity and potentially much more opaque pricing. It is the opposite of fare simplification. It is more like Ryanair on steroids.

and it suggests that much of the intensive research merely re-found what has been known for a long time.

Quote
The RDG says it came to its conclusions after conducting months of “intensive” consumer research which found that passengers want “a fairer, more transparent and easier to use experience”.

They could have saved some time by reaching back to a House of Commons transport committee report from 2006 which concluded that a decade after privatisation : “Passengers are consistently dissatisfied with what they perceive to be the value for money of their fares.”

The privatised rail companies have had 13 years to digest that report’s findings. Yet during that time, they have made the ticketing system ever more complex, and ever more costly for walk-up passengers.

The problem with the RDG proposals is that they come within tight, revenue-neutral, terms of reference. To be fair to the RDG it is operating within a Balkanised network with a frustrating amount of legal restrictions in place.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12330


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: February 19, 2019, 14:21:46 »

Some sympathy for the RDG(resolve) - that last para quoted above is certainly true.

No mention of one idea that the RDG mentioned I thought - pricing every journey as a single, with varying discounts on a return leg over it simply being 2x the single, depending on the required flexibility/time of day required
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 19, 2019, 14:24:35 »

"A fairer, more transparent and easier to use experience" is Miss World stuff. Love and peace to the world, and free apple pie.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40648



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2019, 17:33:10 »



A very interesting comment piece by Sim Harris in Rail News

Quote
Once upon a time fares really were pretty simple. In 1961, for example, each second class mile was charged at about 2.5 old pence by British Railways.

If you knew that London Paddington to Reading was 36 miles, you could work out with reasonable certainty that a second-class single would be about 90 old pence, or seven shillings and sixpence. (That’s 37.5p, but the change in money values since 1961 makes the conversion all but meaningless.)

And a whole lot more (worth a full read!)

http://www.in2013dollars.com/1961-GBP-in-2019
Quote
£100 in 1961 -> £2,207.52 in 2019

Let's apply the inflation factor then ... 37.5p x 22 makes £8.25 single. Hmmm
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2019, 20:02:00 »

This is what a 1965 BR (British Rail(ways)) WR timetable says about fares:


A single from London Paddington to Reading General was then 9/-
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page