Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 18 Apr 2024
* Dubai airport re-opens after UAE sees heavy rain
- Rescuers deflate hedgehog with 'balloon' syndrome
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (1966)
Melksham Station closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
14:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:05 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:14 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
19:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
14:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
Additional 15:20 Bristol Parkway to Weymouth
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
13:23 Swansea to London Paddington
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
13:52 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 15:34:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[60] Signage - not making it easy ...
[29] IETs at Melksham
[27] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[25] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[23] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: See You would be no Better off with National Express!  (Read 14682 times)
12hoursunday
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267


View Profile WWW Email
« on: March 19, 2008, 14:39:26 »

Read this and weep. Prehaps we'll see a MTLS (More Train Less Strain) East Coast branch Grin

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23457587-details/To+hell+and+back+from+King%27s+Cross/article.do
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2008, 15:21:52 »

Read this and weep. Prehaps we'll see a MTLS (More Train Less Strain) East Coast branch Grin

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23457587-details/To+hell+and+back+from+King%27s+Cross/article.do

Frankly, I would look at who is in charge, but maybe that's just me being cynical.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bowker_%28British_businessman%29
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2008, 17:21:05 »

Sorry but you would be a lot worse off with National Express........its a good job they didnt win our Franchise for sure...was this lot not the penny pinching shower behind Wessex Trains??
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2008, 17:23:52 »

Sorry but you would be a lot worse off with National Express........its a good job they didnt win our Franchise for sure...was this lot not the penny pinching shower behind Wessex Trains??

I was thinking more of the fact that they are run by the guy who used to be the Chairman of the SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about).....

Frankly, I would look at who is in charge, but maybe that's just me being cynical.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bowker_%28British_businessman%29
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2008, 18:50:37 »

It was bound to happen. GNER (Great North Eastern Railways) were a top railway company, streets ahead of all the other TOCs (Train Operating Company) so anyone who took over was going to find it hard to match the service provided by GNER. Still could have been worse...First could be running it!  Wink
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2008, 19:08:55 »

Sorry but you would be a lot worse off with National Express........its a good job they didnt win our Franchise for sure...was this lot not the penny pinching shower behind Wessex Trains??

i know what you mean about penny pinching shower although i have worked for both and found wessex were more interested in running a service and looking after staff.
we will never know if they could run the greater western any better than first but i suspect it would be pretty much the same with the only difference being first have a habbit of making big noticable cock ups and then publicly blame others say atw for instance.
this is why i feel fgw get lots of bad press they should stop all these clowns going on the local news trying to blame everything but themselves.
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2008, 19:18:37 »

I would take it that the Newpaper (reporters are the world's best at spin) have picked up on a bad day for Nex East Coast.

I'd admit that National Express have a hard act to follow, GNER (Great North Eastern Railways) was the best Inter-City TOC (Train Operating Company) but I doubt First would run East coast any better than Nat Exp, however with the repution that FGW (First Great Western) have built for themselves (and First) over the past 2 years I can't see First winning any franchise's untill FGW is running BETTER than other TOC's
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2008, 20:23:36 »

Try looking up what National Express wanted to do if they had won the Greater Western Franchise , i still reckon that most of the reliabily issues on FGW (First Great Western) West stock is due to the fact that National Express whilst trading as WESSEX Trains, spent sod all on the stock for a good number of years and FGW are now reaping the benefits of this penny pincing.
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2008, 21:13:59 »

Try looking up what National Express wanted to do if they had won the Greater Western Franchise , i still reckon that most of the reliabily issues on FGW (First Great Western) West stock is due to the fact that National Express whilst trading as WESSEX Trains, spent sod all on the stock for a good number of years and FGW are now reaping the benefits of this penny pincing.


you are wrong there the reliability under wessex was far superior than fgw.

the reason they are crap now is less stock meaning what we have has to work harder,simply has to leave depot each day to form service unless planned in for work,meaning entering service with known faults.
wessex as you say spent nothing on stock in terms of interior type stuff,but mechanical and electrical repairs were done so fgw are not reaping the benefits of penny pinching but have actually bought all this on themselves by not having a clue how to run and maintain dmu services.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2008, 21:28:58 »

I would take it that the Newpaper (reporters are the world's best at spin) have picked up on a bad day for Nex East Coast.

I'd admit that National Express have a hard act to follow, GNER (Great North Eastern Railways) was the best Inter-City TOC (Train Operating Company) but I doubt First would run East coast any better than Nat Exp, however with the repution that FGW (First Great Western) have built for themselves (and First) over the past 2 years I can't see First winning any franchise's untill FGW is running BETTER than other TOC's
I think you could be very right there smokey. Looks like First have wound the government up so much over the FGW franchise that it could be a long time before they ever get awarded another franchise. If I were First it would make me get the FGW franchise working properly at any cost because in the long term it could seriously jeopadise them ever winning another franchise.

Going back to the DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) issue which is being discussed here, its great to finally see more and more refreshed 'West' fleet running on FGW. They look good both inside and out and I hope from a maintainance point of view they are proving more realiable too.
Logged
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 755


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2008, 21:55:17 »

Sorry but you would be a lot worse off with National Express........its a good job they didnt win our Franchise for sure...was this lot not the penny pinching shower behind Wessex Trains??

As Wessex was run by NX as a management contract, doesn't that make the "penny pinching shower" behind it ... the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2008, 21:57:54 »

I thought it was a franchise?
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2008, 22:19:39 »

As Wessex was run by NX as a management contract, doesn't that make the "penny pinching shower" behind it ... the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)?

I thought it was a franchise?

Some interesting links :

2000 Shadow Strategic Rail Authority announcement of new Wessex franchise. Note the SWT (South West Trains) services that it would have included.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/releases/sra/2000/2000b/wessexfranchiseannouncement

2002 Strategic Rail Authority announcement of intention to create a new Greater Western rail franchise by no later than 2006, with quote from then SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about) Chairman and now head of National Express, Richard Bowker.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/releases/sra/20022/2004b/sraannouncesnewfranchisefort1533

2004 National Express press release regarding the two-year franchise extensions signed for Great Northern and Wessex Trains.
http://www.nationalexpressgroup.com/nx/ic/rns/rnsitem?id=1076687216nRNSM4219V&t=popup
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17875


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2008, 22:42:43 »

... WESSEX Trains, spent sod all on the stock for a good number of years and FGW (First Great Western) are now reaping the benefits of this penny pinching.

you are wrong there the reliability under wessex was far superior than fgw.

the reason they are crap now is less stock meaning what we have has to work harder, simply has to leave depot each day to form service unless planned in for work, meaning entering service with known faults.
wessex as you say spent nothing on stock in terms of interior type stuff, but mechanical and electrical repairs were done so fgw are not reaping the benefits of penny pinching but have actually bought all this on themselves by not having a clue how to run and maintain dmu services.

Sorry, smithy, but I'm not convinced?

In my long-term (10 years+!) experience of commuting from Nailsea to BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI)), the local DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) have always been rather unreliable!  For example, this evening, the 1753 was an old (un-refurb) Wessex 150/2: doors A1/A2 were defective - and they had clearly been defective for long enough for FGW to arrange for printed posters to be placed on them, to that effect!  What I'm saying is, the mechanical and electrical state of these units is apparently down to years of 'neglect' - and that does go back to when they were run by Wessex!  Sad
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2008, 23:11:26 »

I personally don't think NX would have done any better with this franchise, after all, NXEC (National Express East Coast) has deteriorated FAR quicker than FGW (First Great Western) did, people forget that Wessex was heavilly subsidised so could afford more units, under Wessex there was more overcrowding in the far southwest than there is now, Wessex used to diagram a single 153 on the Falmouth for the SUMMER MONTHS! and a 150 in the winter! also a single 153 on the Newquay in the summer, most paigntons/Exmouths were 2 cars, most of them are 4 car 142's now. Local fares are far cheaper now. The worst thing about FGW is the "Lack of traincrew" excuse which leads to most cancellations!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page