Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:50:50 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: The capacity of The Mule  (Read 5376 times)
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2019, 20:13:25 »

It would be good to read that 1995 study.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2019, 20:27:09 »

It's a pity that the botched new platform and pseudo-heritage horror inflicted on Templecombe constrains potential options there.

also, the M5 motorway bridge to the east of Pinhoe only allows for a single track, so that would need to be re-modelled if the line were to be completely re-doubled.
Logged
Southernman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 114


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2019, 20:57:22 »

There are many obstacles in the way of complete double tracking unfortunately. As mentioned some of the platforms have been extended onto the disused formation. At Templecombe, not only is the platform in the way but the bridge as rebuilt only has a single width span and the large green container containing signalling equipment etc is also on the formation! And that is only one location.

Other formidable issues are the various tunnels which have had the track moved to the centre. I understand that in some repairs have been made to the walls that have reduced the width. Also embankment slips at some locations have resulted in the track being moved to the centre. Any redoubling may have to incur significant earthworks. Signalling cables have routinely been laid in the spare formation.

Extra loops have been mooted in places where an extra track can reinstated with least expenditure.

 
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 28, 2019, 21:00:45 »

One thing looked at in 2008/9 was extending the Axminster dynamic loop to Chard Junction.  I think it fell on its sword due to costs.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2019, 21:02:50 »

It would be good to read that 1995 study.
Now then, youre expecting a lot.  You haven't seen my archive (garage).  A car has never been in it in the past 30 years..... Roll Eyes
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: March 28, 2019, 21:31:35 »

Is it me having a selective memory or have there been more late notice diversions along the Honiton route in recent months?

That's what I was wondering ... and what the compromises are and where extra Devon Metros might fit in.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 28, 2019, 21:52:26 »

My solution would be to promote cross-TOC (Train Operating Company) co-operation during times of disruption by terminating all SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Waterloo to Exeter services at Yeovil Junction and having diverted GWR (Great Western Railway) services pick up the station stops between Yeovil Junction and Exeter St.Davids, running to the SWR booked times.  Less delay caused by trying to squeeze too many services onto the existing limited infrastructure, and providing the same capacity (although services might be a bit more comfy than usual).
Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 28, 2019, 22:13:46 »

That was one thing they used to do in the past as far as I remember.

Network Rail have released the following

https://cdn.networkrail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Wessex-Route-Strategic-Plan.pdf

P42 CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) key renewals strategy
P84 sets WoE improvements placed in CP7
Logged
Southernman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 114


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 29, 2019, 00:14:03 »

My solution would be to promote cross-TOC (Train Operating Company) co-operation during times of disruption by terminating all SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Waterloo to Exeter services at Yeovil Junction and having diverted GWR (Great Western Railway) services pick up the station stops between Yeovil Junction and Exeter St.Davids, running to the SWR booked times.  Less delay caused by trying to squeeze too many services onto the existing limited infrastructure, and providing the same capacity (although services might be a bit more comfy than usual).

Indeed that used to happen. For SWT (South West Trains)'s (as was) passengers it was often a nightmare as the two timetables didn't 'fit' even when the diversions were planned. Often waiting at Yeovil Jct (with limited facilities/personnel) for 30 plus minutes and in the cold when the station was unstaffed. Very unsatisfactory. I have seen GWR guards refuse to take passengers as train was already full. This plan wouldn't work in an emergency situation. Only real solution is to get on and build some more infrastructure as promised to allow an hourly diversionary path for GWR trains.

Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 29, 2019, 08:25:50 »

My solution would be to promote cross-TOC (Train Operating Company) co-operation during times of disruption by terminating all SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Waterloo to Exeter services at Yeovil Junction and having diverted GWR (Great Western Railway) services pick up the station stops between Yeovil Junction and Exeter St.Davids, running to the SWR booked times.  Less delay caused by trying to squeeze too many services onto the existing limited infrastructure, and providing the same capacity (although services might be a bit more comfy than usual).

Taking the cynical approach............ this would mean having to share revenue between the TOCs - although, probably not so bad now with First having a finger in both pies.

Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 29, 2019, 08:27:40 »

From my years of living and working in Africa, that is a lightly loaded mule - I am sad to say.

AND they have to work every Sunday too.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #26 on: March 29, 2019, 09:17:54 »

Taking the cynical approach............ this would mean having to share revenue between the TOCs (Train Operating Company) - although, probably not so bad now with First having a finger in both pies.

The sensible approach (IMHO (in my humble opinion)) is to get the number of times that diversions have to happen down to a much lower level than we have seen in recent years, and then have an attitude approach that says "look - on theses rare occasions what's going to work best for the customers".      Neither of those are new ideas, and indeed it's comforting to see both as part of the plan (Network Rail's CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) to catch up on a lot of maintenance) and de facto already somewhat in place, with things like GWR (Great Western Railway) and Cross Country ticket acceptance on each other's services when things go belly up.    Work does need to be done in extra quarters as well though - ranging from freight train reliability through buses accepting train tickets when the train ain't running, and the timely provision of taxis to sort our smaller blips.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: April 08, 2019, 10:56:50 »

It's a pity that the botched new platform and pseudo-heritage horror inflicted on Templecombe constrains potential options there.

I thought I heard somewhere that the new platform at Templecombe could be moved back should re-doubling ever be on the cards.

Am I having a "senior moment" or has anybody else heard the same?
Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 08, 2019, 11:34:23 »

Templecombe's platform change was indeed made such that it could be easily removed for re-doubling.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #29 on: April 08, 2019, 13:30:46 »

Might well be the case, and happy to stand corrected if it is - still hate the overall effect though.

I used to use the waiting room on the "old"  Templecombe platform regularly as a child during the Class 50 era as I often went with my dad to Wincanton, changing to the bus outside the station entrance. It had a cosy, welcoming atmosphere, with heater, toilets and books available and open for much of the operating day, a testament to one of the earliest examples of community and rail working in partnership, celebrated in the displays of the history of that partnership on show.

Now that old waiting room atmosphere, along with the previously interesting to visit signalbox/ticket office, has been pointlessly ruined by aforementioned pseudo-heritage rebranding, and made inaccessible to visitors on non "special" days by the locked out of use footbridge. The modern monstrosity of the replacement ticket office/waiting room is bereft of appeal by comparison, only open limited hours, and the level of shelter on the new platform is woefully inadequate on days of inclement weather.

Your resident fluffy bunny kicker is not a fan.
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page