Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningShort Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 01:10:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Call for TfL to Take Over London Infrastructure from NR  (Read 5326 times)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« on: March 29, 2019, 10:04:54 »

More unnecessary turmoil......

https://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/mayor-calls-for-transport-for-london-to-replace-network-rail-as-infrastructure-manager.html

Quote
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has called for Transport for London to replace Network Rail as the infrastructure manager for routes which are used by suburban passenger services operated under concessions awarded by TfL» (Transport for London - about).

The proposal forms part of TfL’s submission of its views to a review of the rail sector which Secretary of State for Transport Chris Grayling has commissioned from former British Airways CEO (Chief Executive Officer) Keith Williams.
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2019, 10:33:26 »

All his talk about what he has done for cycling is hot air if you look closely. Don't want the same for railways.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2019, 10:34:52 »

I welcome the idea, personally.

If done correctly, then both services and infrastructure could end up being overseen by a body that is genuinely accountable to both passengers and taxpayers, in a way that Network Rail has consistently shown time and again it has absolutely no interest in being.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2019, 10:51:32 »

I welcome the idea, personally.

If done correctly, then both services and infrastructure could end up being overseen by a body that is genuinely accountable to both passengers and taxpayers, in a way that Network Rail has consistently shown time and again it has absolutely no interest in being.

Agreed. TfL» (Transport for London - about)'s culture and customer service is stratospherically better than NRs» (Network Rail - home page) or any of the TOCs (Train Operating Company) I've used (admittedly that's not a very high bar!) and this has been noticed out this way at the stations they are now managing. The accountability is a huge factor which NR and TOCS are happy to pass to and fro....this could provide a refreshing change.
Logged
rogerpatenall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 321



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2019, 11:14:11 »

Me, too, Westcombe Park being my local station in the UK (United Kingdom). Whilst I am not sure about the mayor's overall record, the TfL» (Transport for London - about) operated services are better run, and, as an old fogey with a Freedom Pass, there is no 'not before 930am' restriction. I also accept the common held view that TfL are far better at fare collection.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2019, 11:15:14 »

But it will create more interfaces and we certainly don't need any more of those.  They usually result in ownership issues (i.e. "Not my problem, Guv").... Tongue
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2019, 11:16:55 »

I can see some merit in the idea, but also significant problems.
My main concern would a conflict of interest between TfL» (Transport for London - about) wanting priority for London commuters  versus existing TOCs (Train Operating Company) and their longer distance customers.

We have already seen the potential start of this with long distance west country services that stop at Reading. A vociferous Reading MP (Member of Parliament), and supporters thereof, want the service operated primarily for Reading passengers, with the needs of longer distance customers being secondary.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
hassaanhc
Full Member
***
Posts: 79


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2019, 12:05:29 »

I can see some merit in the idea, but also significant problems.
My main concern would a conflict of interest between TfL» (Transport for London - about) wanting priority for London commuters  versus existing TOCs (Train Operating Company) and their longer distance customers.

We have already seen the potential start of this with long distance west country services that stop at Reading. A vociferous Reading MP (Member of Parliament), and supporters thereof, want the service operated primarily for Reading passengers, with the needs of longer distance customers being secondary.
You mean realising that not everyone is going to/from Paddington, and therefore stopping at one of the biggest railway interchanges in the country makes railway journeys more attractive for those on the various lines radiating out from there. Especially when you consider how poor the frequency to intermediate stations between Reading and Taunton is, so not many opportunities for changing further down the line.
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2019, 12:22:18 »

Is this all about money? As we know TfL» (Transport for London - about) finances are not in a very good place and could taking over these lines improve their finances, at least in the short-term?

I am convinced that one of the reasons why TfL has taken over Reading - London line is for the ticket money.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the finances of GWR (Great Western Railway) once Reading - London money is removed, will GWR require a subsidy?
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2019, 21:00:14 »

...and a little bit more about turning South London Orange... Tongue

https://www.centreforlondon.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Turning_South_London_Orange.pdf
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2019, 22:24:36 »

I am afraid I am definitely against this.

TfL» (Transport for London - about) needs to understand that its Elizabeth Line is just one user of one part of the GWML (Great Western Main Line). It will not even be the sole user of the relief/slow lines - from what I have read outside peak hours it will share track with stopping GWR (Great Western Railway) trains between Reading and Paddington. The line is the main artery of the rail system to a large part of the west of Britain, not a branch of London's suburban railway network.

TfL's network is mostly single user lines with tube trains playing follow my leader up and down or round and round (almost!) their route. The GWML has to combine 125 mph expresses for Wales and the west, semi-fasts and stopping trains for the Thames and Kennet Valleys and beyond into the Cotswolds, long heavy mineral trains for Acton, container trains crossing London, and all controlled from a signalling centre in Didcot. What experience has TfL in running an operation like this?

It has also not exactly covered itself in glory with its oversight of Crossrail either.

As to-

Quote
If done correctly, then both services and infrastructure could end up being overseen by a body that is genuinely accountable to both passengers and taxpayers, in a way that Network Rail has consistently shown time and again it has absolutely no interest in being.

How will TfL be accountable to the voters of South Bucks, Oxfordshire, Berkshire, Wiltshire, Gloucestershire, Somerset, Bristol, Devon, Cornwall, Worcestershire, Herefordshire and South Wales, none of whom will have a vote in the London mayoral election? Having a vital part of our rail infrastructure under the political control of someone answerable to an electorate who have little knowledge of,  or interest in, our transport needs puts us in a worse position than we are in now.

 
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2019, 22:28:38 »

How is Network Rail accountable to any of them now?
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2019, 08:09:23 »

TfL» (Transport for London - about) needs to understand that its Elizabeth Line is just one user of one part of the GWML (Great Western Main Line). It will not even be the sole user of the relief/slow lines - from what I have read outside peak hours it will share track with stopping GWR (Great Western Railway) trains between Reading and Paddington. The line is the main artery of the rail system to a large part of the west of Britain, not a branch of London's suburban railway network.

Maybe it needs six-tracking like the WCML (West Coast Main Line), so that TfL can have its equivalent of the DC (Direct Current) lines to play with, and the Main and Relief lines can be used for trains that at least get west of Reading.
Logged

ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2019, 08:38:45 »

How is Network Rail accountable to any of them now?

That's not the point.

The point is it would be accountable only to a body of Londoners. So they could prioritise local commuter services to the exclusion of long distance. That would worsen the London/rest of the UK (United Kingdom) divide.  DfT» (Department for Transport - about) is already overly biassed towards London and the South East. This would make it worse. 
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2019, 09:15:27 »

If you read the proposal, you'll see that TfL» (Transport for London - about) address that by proposing a system operator function within NR» (Network Rail - home page) maintaining ‘fair play’ for timetabling with arbitration by ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about).

I accept SandTEngineer's point that this would create an additional interface, but I think this is a price worth paying for the benefits that I and the other posters on the thread who agree with me feel the proposal will bring.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page