Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:53:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[102] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[56] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[44] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[41] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[40] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: "I would recommend passengers to sit as far as possible from the engine ..."  (Read 17504 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 14, 2019, 06:43:24 »

From Chemistry World

Quote
Air on board diesel trains is five times more polluted than beside a busy street

Travelling on a diesel train can expose you to far higher levels of harmful particulates than standing beside a busy road, a Danish study has found. Diesel exhaust is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, as well as other lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Those sitting on carriages being pulled by a diesel engine, especially close to the engine, breathe in a much larger dose of diesel fumes. Measurements revealed that ultrafine particles were 35-fold higher and black carbon or soot six-fold higher inside carriages pulled by diesel trains versus electric.1 Ultrafine particles are often carbon nanoparticles, coated with hydrocarbons and metals.

Long article - lots of data follows / worth a read.   Technical review / comments on how the figures might translate to UK (United Kingdom) trains and to diesel multiple units would be appreciated.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2019, 08:02:05 »

Presumably for DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), sitting as far from the engines as possible means we will be travelling "Indian style", on the roof.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2019, 08:32:25 »

Presumably for DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), sitting as far from the engines as possible means we will be travelling "Indian style", on the roof.

This whole clean air in and around trains is interesting and perhaps it could become a major subject. The original article goes on to suggest that a train with a locomotive at the back is far better than a train with one at the front, so perhaps that means that the new Liverpool to Scarborough workings (Nova 3 - class 68 + 5 x Mk 5a coaches) will mean that a journey to Scarborough is far safer air-wise than the journey back home?  But then the research - and the image used on the original quoted article - appears to be older / less clean trains.

Searching a bit further, I found two more links

https://www.doranandmurphy.com/Cancer-Railroad-Exposures/Diesel-Fume-Exhaust-Exposure.aspx

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/all-diesel-trains-should-be-scrapped-by-2040-jojohnson-tells-railbosses-lt0pr38vf

and some pictures showing that if you think we may have a problem in the UK (United Kingdom) ...



Has anyone asked GWR (Great Western Railway), RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board), ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), Transport Focus or the train leasing companies about air cleanliness in UK trains??
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2019, 09:16:34 »

My initial reaction to the article (not being able to read the reported paper) is that the conclusions are far more general than the data they are based on. While some aspects of the clean-up of diesel engines since the 1980s (when the ones on that line were built) have yielded less than expected, the latest car engines are as clean as petrol ones. So I can't see how the data can avoid being very specific to the trains, and operations, one the line(s) studied, and not general at all.

That raises another point, which has always puzzled me. Trains don't come under the same regime as buses and other road vehicles, but the NRMM category instead. That is essentially for industrial engines, but portable or self-mobile ones, and "not intended for carrying passengers or goods on the road". But the spatial relationship of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) engines to passengers is very similar to bus engines, isn't it? odd, really.
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2019, 09:28:28 »

The Public Health England Review of interventions to improve outdoor air quality and public health, appears to extol bi-modes over straight diesels. I can't see the connections between the text and the pages of references with the machine I am using here.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2019, 10:38:16 »

The Public Health England Review of interventions to improve outdoor air quality and public health, appears to extol bi-modes over straight diesels......

So, they are saying that a journey from Newbury to Penzance (for example) in a bi-mode is better for you than in an ordinary diesel?
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2019, 11:24:31 »

I expect it's far healthier to travel on a diesel train than on a diesel bus, likewise standing at a station waiting for a train would be better than waiting for a bus on a busy road.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2019, 11:34:38 »

The Public Health England Review of interventions to improve outdoor air quality and public health, appears to extol bi-modes over straight diesels......

So, they are saying that a journey from Newbury to Penzance (for example) in a bi-mode is better for you than in an ordinary diesel?

Whether it is or it isnt, I find it far more f****** depressing in a bi-mode, which is why I dont do it any more...
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2019, 12:12:35 »

Out of interest I wonder what studies have been made of steam locomotive particulate emissions? Perhaps not a major concern to those of us who may visit one or two preserved railways a year, but for the people who regularly drive and fire preserved locos, and for on-train staff, the exposure is presumably more of a concern.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2019, 12:28:01 »

Out of interest I wonder what studies have been made of steam locomotive particulate emissions? Perhaps not a major concern to those of us who may visit one or two preserved railways a year, but for the people who regularly drive and fire preserved locos, and for on-train staff, the exposure is presumably more of a concern.

It's going to be hard to find out, as the phrase "steam locomotive particulate emissions" gets several hits but they appear to all be passing comments in introductions and the like. Plus of course the post quoted here will get hits too ...

But surely "steam locomotive" is not a relevant category; isn't it the fuel that counts? So you would expect different effects for coal, wood, oil, and electric-fuelled steam locomotives.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2019, 12:37:18 »

...you would expect different effects for coal, wood, oil, and electric-fuelled steam locomotives.

Indeed; there's also quite a difference between a Great Western loco running on good Welsh steam coal, and a loco from one of the also-ran railways running on lignite...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2019, 13:50:44 »

...you would expect different effects for coal, wood, oil, and electric-fuelled steam locomotives.

Indeed; there's also quite a difference between a Great Western loco running on good Welsh steam coal, and a loco from one of the also-ran railways running on lignite...

You need to go back a long time to find GWR (Great Western Railway) engines running on "good Welsh steam coal"

What there was was being exported post-war, and the railways were having to make do with coal dust glued together with concrete (ovoids and briquettes). That's why so many draughting modifications were carried out at Swindon in the 1950s to make the blighters steam at all.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2019, 14:15:42 »

Quote
I expect it's far healthier to travel on a diesel train than on a diesel bus, likewise standing at a station waiting for a train would be better than waiting for a bus on a busy road.

It depends on the layout and design of the station.

One of the problems with the "new" Reading Station is that when the wind is in certain directions, and there are diesels idling on the platforms (remember we still have Turbos, and then there are the Cross Country Voyagers), the covered over bridge fills with diesel fumes.

It is not helped by the habit of holding a number of Turbos waiting to go to the depot, all at platforms idling, although this is a much reduced problem now most have been replaced by Electrostars, or by the Cross Country trains having prolonged waits at Reading during their reversal there, again with engines running. We really need them to cut their engines off, and if they need electricity for services while standing, perhaps a "shore supply" and connection could be arranged for them while they do so if their batteries are not up to it.

As for pollution from steam engines, remember they largely operated in an era when highly polluting coal provided most of our electricity, town gas, domestic fires etc, when we had pea-souper fogs and in the industrial north net curtains had to be replaced regularly as the sulphurous air dissolved them.
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1244



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2019, 15:32:28 »

Out of interest I wonder what studies have been made of steam locomotive particulate emissions? Perhaps not a major concern to those of us who may visit one or two preserved railways a year, but for the people who regularly drive and fire preserved locos, and for on-train staff, the exposure is presumably more of a concern.

Not a concern, I assure you. The aroma of their emissions is just one of the reasons I volunteer!

Ahh, steam ... ,
and soot, clinker, vaporised oil, coal dust, ash ...
Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2019, 16:14:24 »

Whilst I understand 81D's misgivings about diesel fumes in stations (and the worst by far that I have ever encountered is on the footbridge at Manchester Victoria where the DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) idle immediately below it), the original thread was about the on-train situation.

Something that crossed my mind is that these days the vast majority of stock is air conditioned and there isn't much stock still running with opening windows. As I see it therefore, if you are travelling in what is essentially a semi-sealed box, air pollution from outside whilst on the move is going to be minimal. And in addition, if pollution is coming into the coach via the aircon, it's not going to make any difference whatsoever which coach you are in.

So I suspect that this latest scare story report only really applies to older stock with opening windows.

 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page